Summary

Brian Thompson, CEO of UnitedHealthcare, was fatally shot in a premeditated attack outside the New York Hilton Midtown before speaking at an investor conference.

The gunman, still at large, fired multiple times, leaving shell casings marked with the words “deny,” “defend,” and “depose.”

Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive. His wife confirmed prior threats against him.

Analysts speculate a possible vendetta tied to his company. The case raises questions about executive security, as Thompson lacked personal protection despite known risks.

  • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    158
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    The case raises questions about executive security

    Thankfully it doesn’t raise any questions about the place of billionaire CEOs of companies making life and death decisions for the general populace for the sake of their overflowing pocket book. Boy would that be awkward.

    • Cargon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      7 days ago

      The case raises questions about executive security

      Weird. I don’t have any questions about that.

    • C126@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      52
      ·
      7 days ago

      Just curious: do you know any life or death decision he personally made that wasn’t the result of hundreds of bean counters crafting policy over many years? I find it hard to believe the ceo rubber stamped any decision like that, or even that he was aware of the details of any individual case.

      • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        57
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        7 days ago

        The CEO is ultimately responsible for the actions of the company. That’s literally their job. They set policy, direction and strategy, and if we’re to listen to what CEOs say they do,they also set the tone, attitude and energy of the company.

        So unless the denials that resulted in death were done in opposition to corporate policy, the CEO is responsible for them.

        Additionally, there was literally nothing stopping him from pushing a company policy of, as a thought, approving all claims involving minors, changing approval standards to only deny when the treatment was unequivocally unnecessary after a verbal consultation between the patients doctor and the insurance review doctor, and moving the balance of claim review to fraud investigation to recoup money after instead of denying upfront.

      • Chaotic Entropy@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        7 days ago

        Decisions that led to his company having the worst denial rate nationwide and the decision to wholly adopt an AI system that is known to have a 90% error rate to achieve it. Overflowing profits and bonuses sank right in to his pockets for his business acumen, and the key thing you do to earn that CEO payday is sign off on everything and be culpable when the shit hits the fan.

      • sudo@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 days ago

        Yes the machine of human misery and death was already constructed before Mr Thompson got into the drivers seat. What’s you’re point? That he somehow didn’t know it was a death machine?

      • NotMyOldRedditName@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        7 days ago

        CEOs of these companies will say things along the lines of find a way to deny an extra X% of claims this year, our profits are down!

        Edit: and I wouldn’t be surprised if they said something like or find a reason to deny that will get overturned if looked at further but maybe they won’t fight back hard enough.

  • 01011@monero.town
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    131
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    I finally understand what certain people mean when they talk about “good guys with guns”.

  • Dasus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    112
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive.

    Friggin Sherlock Holmes’ over here.

    The case raises questions about executive security

    “We won’t be pressured into changing the system we’ll just protect the rich exploiters better”

  • Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    98
    ·
    7 days ago

    Its simple all you clueless colombos. Just start investigating all denied claims where the person died at a result. Shouldn’t take more than a decade or so to go though that list.

  • Milk_Sheikh@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    7 days ago

    Despite a fairly obvious motive in general before this news broke, and now confirmation it was because of their policies, they are doing zero soul searching or reexamination of why their policies became a motive

    Thompson’s killing quickly sent shockwaves through the corporate world, with corporate security heads gathering in a conference call to Wednesday.

    “Many of my colleagues today are sitting down with their executive protection team leaders, their security leadership teams, and re-evaluating what they are doing and not doing,” Dave Komendat, president of Seattle-based Komendat Risk Management Services

    Who had neo-Pinkertons on their 2020s bingo?

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    7 days ago

    Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive.

    Aye, that sure is a mystery for the ages. Maybe he cut somebody up in traffic?

    • sylver_dragon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      There’s a gulf of difference between jumping to an obvious conclusion and actually doing the investigative work to really answer the question. The police aren’t dumb and are probably just as sure as the rest of us as to the motive that will be found. However, they still need to make that determination based on real evidence, especially if it’s going to go to court. So, “it’s unclear” until they have something which provides strong evidence of a motive.

      Ya, I’d be putting all my chips on this being someone who was on the receiving end of a denied claim. But, you never know when it’s going to end up being the guy failing to pay up to the Russian Mafia or some other situation which resulted in a targeted attack. I’m not going to defend all the actions of the police, but they do occasionally stop shooting kids long enough investigate crimes properly.

  • Ellen_musk_ox@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    ·
    7 days ago

    The case raises questions about executive security,

    Of course this is the lesson. Not that everyone hates you, your company, the business, etc. It’s not our actions. We just need security.

    • demizerone@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      7 days ago

      Pretty soon they are going to need security droids like those in the movie Elysium. They are already working on that.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    7 days ago

    Has anyone in law enforcement even done the first step here and put together a list of people who might have a reason to kill this guy? Lets get with the program here, cops.

    • medgremlin@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      7 days ago

      The company already has a list. They can just look through their denied claims pile… That shouldn’t be too hard.

      … Oh wait, that list is millions of people long.

    • Gray@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      7 days ago

      Step 1) Find a list of every US citizen

      Step 2) Copy

      Step 3) Paste

  • Pyrin@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I don’t give two flying fucks about the investigation of this case. A dead shitty CEO of a company that has openly declined more coverage to those who’d need it most, is good news to me and all that I want to know.

    Kudos to the gunman.

  • M0oP0o@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    7 days ago

    Authorities suggest Thompson was targeted but remain unclear on the motive.

    Ummmm, real solid police work here. Although motive might be hard to narrow down, its not like this was a popular CEO.