Lol, I like you. Likewise, cheers mate :)

No worries. Let’s just be chill lol.

I will say, I think you joined an argument to argue something no one was talking about.

athatet@lemmy.zip said Because people are not ‘illegal’ for crossing an imaginary line on a map. to which I responded, Where did he call anyone ‘illegal’?

No one is arguing about using the word illegal, but specifically labelling people as illegal. A person cannot be in and of themselves illegal, but they can illegally migrate. That’s the discussion. athatet seems to have mentally lumped me in with a group of ideologies of which I do not belong. I actually agree with athatet here and I was trying to show that we’re on the same page on this.

You barged in here on a completely different tangent for no reason swinging in full force derailing that. Maybe you yourself call undocumented immigrants “illegal immigrants,” but that’s a whole different discussion.

Anyway, hopefully that helps clarify my position and doesn’t come off confrontational at all. Thank you for your good faith response, I actually really appreciate it.

Can I just ask you a question and maybe get an actual answer? Like, why are you here? We could have had an actual conversation, but you’re just trying to get a rise out of me for literally no reason. What’s the point?

You’ve either lost the plot or are a troll. Have a nice day.

“Illegal immigration” is the act of migrating into a country in violation of that nation’s immigration laws. It does not describe people, but an act.

On the other hand, there is no such thing as an “illegal immigrant” and no where in the article text, Bernie’s words or otherwise, was there purported here to be so. Again, please point to me where anyone (read: a person) was called “illegal.”

In summary: you should not accuse others of being unable to read when you clearly cannot do so yourself.

I’d actually be curious as to the share of resources each of these aspects of modern internet architecture use.

I’m just just Google sans AI sucks up some serious water and electricity, I just have no idea how it compares.

I really love what you’ve contributed to the conversation, “Nonconfrontational”.

“You removed, or stupid?” and “Can you not read?” are very informative, thank you for posting.

Guess I shouldn’t be too surprised by someone from lemmy.ml, though.

Literally no where in the quote or article linked was anyone called “illegal.” He referred to people as undocumented, if that’s what you mean? Can you not read?

I mean, yeah, if you’re punishing people for consuming the drugs directly, 100%. However, Trump’s focus has been more on preventing fentanyl from entering the country.

Unfortunately, he’s still an idiot since the US’s own pharmaceutical companies are the primary culprit and he’s just using Mexico as a scapegoat, so yeah, you’re not wrong lol.

Where did he call anyone ‘illegal’?

Think about the glorious profits we made for the shareholders! Truly beautiful. Now excuse me while I die a preventable heat related death.

…What’s wrong with his position, exactly?

Try Kagi today, just use coupon code “SHILL” for 1 month free!

I prefer Bypass Paywalls Dirty 😈

You mostly just use one pedal for driving (in Teslas or any other EV), as lifting initiates regenerative braking, recouping some energy. They all still have a standard left side physical brake pedal, however, for when more braking force is required in an emergency or for a more aggressive stop.

LibreWolf!

Crazy self own my guy

I think you’ve gone off on a bit of a tangent here. This is less about lack of understanding and more about people utilizing AI to offset their thinking. The less we exercise our skills (be it writing software, medical diagnosis, etc.) the fewer opportunities for growth and reinforcement of skills users of AI have.

The bicycle never replaced walking, it just provided another means of locomotion. People straight up use AI to think for them.

“I don’t like them therefore no one does” -you

People had the same conversations when YouTube was new and unproven, before it was the household name it is now. Many people thought it would never be profitable and watched them burn billion after billion.

I do think LLMs are overhyped, I’m with you there, but I do think they also provide utility that many use. Is it a bubble that will pop? 100%. But just like the web after the dotcom bubble, it’ll never go away.

YouTube would lose a billion annually early on as they expanded infrastructure to keep up with massive demand 🤷‍♀️

They figured it out eventually, all they had to do was enshittify everything.