I can maybe take them steam rolling over traditional values and the sanctity of marriage but “etc” too? They’ve gone too far this time.

Tbf, that is the most cost effective solution for our capitalist overlords.

It turns out that finding out there wasn’t any meaning in the world meant a lot to some people.

If the CEOs didn’t do it, the shareholders would ruin their lives.

“I’m sorry the lower value human capital heard me call them that.”

Looking forward to it

Our toxic culture is an employment based, market fundamentalist culture. Any smart alien would run from that.

There’s little to no evidence that cardio excerse leads to weight loss. Groups who restrict calorie intake alway out perform the exercise group in weight loss studies and there’s never any significant difference between 2 groups who both restrict calories but one exercises and the other does not.

It’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how we use glycogen for moving around and fat as an emergency reserve. If we remember that we evolved as persistence hunters, it starts to make more sense. I.E. what’s the point in putting on a layer of fat for a winter reserve, if you could accidentally run it off chasing down a meal? Those that could run it off chasing down a meal didn’t survive the hard winters and those that didn’t lived.

The whole idea that you could do cardio to lose weight was invented by food producers to make people think they could treat their diet like a credit card and payback overspending with exercise. That way, we would eat more and they would make more money. It’s also the reason it’s called cardiovascular exercise and not weight-loss excersise.

It’s funny that they don’t say that about people who own for their money. If they did, they might be worth listening to. As it is, they just don’t like it when poor people do it.

“No, honestly, it’s my chewing gum Wrigley’s beermint.”

100%! There does seem to be a shit-lib idea that allowing the mega rich to dictate our immigration policy, specifically in order to drive down wages, is a left wing position. It is not. Not even slightly.

Even as someone who knows the only way to stop most of the shit is to abolish boarders all together, which is way too radical for most people, we have to deal with the world as it is, not how we would like it to be.

Of course the mega rich are a bigger problem, but don’t think they won’t weaponise immigration in more than one way where they can.

Love it!

I accept all major credit cards, cash and ritual humiliation.

Why would a war on the completion alone hurt the CIAs drug sales? Think through what you’re saying before labeling it in that way, just because you dont understand what’s being said. If your drug runners make it across the border without any hassle, you make more money than anyone else. It really isn’t as hard to understand as you’re making out to be.

Also, I mean the CIA literally ran the heroin game out of Laos and Myanmar from the start Vietnam war until they switched the base of operations of Afghanistan in the early 2000s. It’s how they paid for operation gladio and the illegal regime changes around the world, in the exact same way they flooded America with crack in the 80s.

It not making sense to you is a user issue.

If we realise that the “war on drugs” was actually the CIA’s war on the competition because counter narco insurgency is, for instance and purposes, indistinguishable from narco insurgency, the “war on drugs” was a roaring success. I mean, those illegal regime changes and death squads aren’t free, ya know.

You’d have thought that depicting Mary pegging satan would get you burned at the steak in those days. Apparently not, it would seem.

They have eyes for nipples and nipples for eyes. It’s Titface!

In the rest of the western world, landlords buy houses. They’re especially prolific for this in places with a high demand for housing, as this will maximise their profit extraction for the least amount of work. It’s a real problem, especially when the people denying mortgages to people are the same ones buying up the housing stock.

The same claim is made in the UK about the “real” problem being building regulations, as if forcing developers to build infrastructure like schools and roads (along with the houses they want to build) is a bad thing. Luckily though, the idea that the private sector could save us from themselves, at the expense of their own profit, is so silly that most people are informed enough to dismiss it instantly as nothing more than the corporate propaganda it is.

At some point, we have to start accepting the finite nature of land.

I would look at things like “supply and demand” to answer that question.

Imo, the reason trump went along with it is because mossad have trump’s kompromat.

“How dare you say that I’d convert to islam”

Trump 2026.