If someone claims something happened on the fediverse without providing a link, they’re lying.

  • 3 Posts
  • 448 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: April 30th, 2024

help-circle
  • Articles like this are just funny to me. I mean, look at the way it starts, “China’s EV market is imploding: Beijing’s grand ambition threatens to take down the global car industry.” Both the title and the subtitle are telling you “China bad” but for completely opposite reasons. The subtitle wants you to be afraid that China’s EV market is going to be strong enough to dominate the global auto industry - China bad! But the title wants you to know that the EV market is failing because - China bad! It’s ridiculous, it really is a Catch-22 where the author will try to evoke negative feelings about China regardless of what they do or don’t do, regardless of what’s true or untrue, which is exactly what I’ve come to expect from this trash outlet, always full of the most chauvanistic takes imaginable.

    As other commenters have pointed out, the auto industry is also propped up by government intervention in the US, particularly with tariffs. And naturally, this wave of protectionism (there and elsewhere) shrinks the market for Chinese cars, resulting in overproduction. A problem which the Chinese government has identified and has moved to address, as mentioned in the article. But of course, when the Chinese government makes an honest assessment of an internal problem, Western sources use that to blow it out of proportion. And the cheaper prices resulting from the reduced size of the market is presented as some sort of underhanded scheme, which in turn justified tariffs.

    What would this article even look like, if you removed all the loaded language, all the scaremongering and shitting on China? “Tariffs lead to reduced demand for Chinese EVs, leading to lower prices.” There, done, saved you a bajillion words.






  • lol this thread is off the rails and should probably get modded

    Yes, it should be. I was trying to shitpost in peace when PJ comes here trying to start shit with me to distract from another conversation in order to weasel out of providing any evidence.

    offered evidence of some (supposedly controversial) event.

    Lol no he did not. Not even a shred. On principle, even.

    See, I’m accused of being a witch, and by asking for proof that any witchcraft actually happened I’m questioning the Inquisition and proving my guilt.