Are not all ORMs like that? I only used ActiveRecord before fucking off from backend 10 years ago

Because it’s cheaper to buy a commodity chip and program it rather than get an application specific chip made.

Great read, I rarely find an opinion article that has substance and is not just random drivel and ragebait.

Thanks for sharing

The sticks were digitally driven for quite a while as well. Managed to short circuit a 2004 VW Passat’s electronics, the sticks started to point in random directions all over the place while the car was in motion. And I don’t mean shaking, just going to a random value and settling on it every 1.5 seconds.

Was very spooky.

He was in government for 20 (16+4 before) and stole for longer than that.

SPAs were a mistake.

I actually did an experiment on doing just that. For context, I’m an experienced software engineer, whose company buys him a tom of Claude usage so I had time to test out what it can actually do and I feel like I’m capable of judging where it’s good and where it falls short at.

How Claude Code works is that there are actually multiple models involved, one for doign the coding, one “reasoning” model to keep the chain of thought and the context going, and a bunch of small specialized ones for odd jobs around the thing.

The thing that doesn’t work yet is that the big reasoning model has to still be big, otherwise it will hallucinate frequently enough to break the workflow. If you could get one of the big models to run locally, you’d be there. However, with recent advances in quantization and MoE models, it’s actually getting nearer fast enough that I would expect it to be generally available in a year or two.

Today the best I could do was a tool that could take 150 gigs of RAM, 24 gigs of VRAM and AMD’s top of the line card to take 30 minutes what takes Claude Code 1-2. But surprisingly, the output of the model was not bad at all.

If he does that, he will lose the support of his whole party. We’ve done that once before, that’s how we ended up in this mess.

That’s my point, the only easy thing to do is the platform they have the mandate for. They have basically unlimited power to do so.

Usually a heterogenous party is achieved by diluting your message and doing “big tent” and making conflicting promises. Tisza did the opposite, they sharpened their message and made barely any promises, taking great care to limit them to what the whole electorate actually 100% agrees on.

Which includes wealth taxes for the richest and anti-corruption.

It’s actually a good question, he wants wealth taxes and term limits, but waves Hungarian flags around and quotes Reagan.

He’s a hardline pro-EU nationalist who likes socialist policies and hates rich people.

Magyar confirmed in his victory speech that he will in fact start those cases.

Or rather the independent juicidary and the new “National Wealth Reclamation Agency” will.

Not really, there is no oligarch base behind him to speak of, and his party is very heterogenous. Imagine LGBT activists and hardline nationalists together. It would be a miracle - not of the good kind - if he was able to get away with not enacting the anticorruption agenda he got elected on.

Putin gives zero fucks about Iranian children, he was perfectly fine killing Russian civilians to get into power.

Shaheds on the other hand…

Not Cyrillic, it says “és a szapora szobanövény"

Standard TLS, I think, but what else would you need?

They can ban payments from the EU to Pornhub

East German anthem

Not the entire supply, just enough to affect prices. Basically the stock market but without even the appearance of it not being manipulated to hell.

And it’s not Russia, or not just them, anyone with enough money to play can fuck people with sub-8 figure net worths over.

But that increases the money supply. This way they can take money from other people. For example Russia can get USD without printing and inflating RUB.

To make money