• Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    What to do when you have a tailgater behind you:

    1. Foot off the gas.
    2. Wait until the tailgater tries to overtake you.
    3. PIT maneuver.
    4. Keep driving safely.
  • MetalMachine@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 hours ago

    This is why I’m in favor of public transit. So many people should not be on the road. This goes for the granny under the speed limit drivers and the insane road ragers.

  • tungsten5@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    9 hours ago

    When people ride my ass while I am doing (at least) the speed limit I just take my foot off the gas to gently slow down until they go around me. If its only one lane then I will go under the speed limit. Im petty too like that

    • squaresinger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s not just petty, it’s safety.

      You can’t influence the size of the safety margin between you and the car behind you. But you can influence the speed at which the person behind you slams into you in case of an accident, by reducing the speed that both of you drive.

      • rayyy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        29 minutes ago

        When I drive in deer country, especially at night, I will always slow up when encountering a tailgater because I might have to brake hard for an animal and don’t want to hit a deer AND/OR get rear ended - going slower means they will at least hit me less hard. They can go around if they don’t like my speed. Also, statistics show that drivers that stay well behind other vehicles have far fewer accidents. Finally, traffic tends to travel at the speed of the slowest drivers on the road, so they gain little on our curvy, hilly two lane roads.

    • Apytele@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      9 hours ago

      If it’s a 2 lane per side road the best way to get them to pass you is to not break check them but just take your foot off the gas until they get frustrated enough to just go around but this contextually sounds like a single lane sitch which you are correct is dangerous.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I’m a school bus driver and the course material (and test questions) for the CDL state this explicitly. If someone is tailgating you, you slow down. Tailgaters are gonna tailgate no matter what, and slowing down means the damage will be less if they do happen to hit you. If that makes them mad tough tittie (the course material does not use “tough tittie” but you can tell they wanted to).

        The great irony of people who tailgate school buses is that WE CAN’T EVEN FUCKING SEE YOU BACK THERE. Even in your fantasy world of the person in front of you feeling pressured and speeding up (which never ever actually happens), it can’t possibly happen if they don’t even know you’re there.

        • squaresinger@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          I’m not doubting you at all, but how dumb does one have to be to tailgate a bus? As if you can force a bus into anything.

          If you tailgate a larger vehicle, all you do is put yourself into mortal danger.

        • Squirrelanna@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Unfortunately for some, that pressure is real and entirely illogical. For the longest time my wife would start getting anxious and frustrated when someone tailgated her and would start to speed up… Only to contue getting tailgated by the same person. Took a lot of insistence from me to not play their stupid game for her to realize that not only was it stupid to speed up for them, but more dangerous and entirely illegal to start speeding just because of a tailgater.

    • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I would fully agree that confronting a lunatic face to face is dangerous, but the chances of getting shot for driving slow is next to zero.

  • glitchdx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    15 hours ago

    This comment section is a very good case study in why better public transportation is absolutely necessary: a lot of you should not ever drive.

  • Paddzr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Using phone while driving… Great.

    Fuck everyone who ever touches their phone while the vehicle is on. This shit is not okay, ever.

    • Zink@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I have some great news for you. Look at what took effect yesterday in my state! Using a mobile device, including at a red light, is now a primary offense (you’ll get pulled over for just that).

      This just applies to PA, but it’s a pretty big state with a population between Sweden and the Netherlands, so it’s not nothing!

      https://www.pa.gov/content/dam/copapwp-pagov/en/penndot/documents/travelinpa/safety/trafficsafetyanddrivertopics/documents/distracted-driving-laws-fact-sheet.pdf

      • coolfission@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Doesn’t matter if it’s not enforced. We have no holding phone rules in GA and I routinely see people using their phones while driving.

        • Sauerkraut@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Worse, too often these laws are selectively enforced only when cops are looking for an excuse to profile minorities and poorer drivers.

          • LousyCornMuffins@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 hours ago

            yeah i was gonna say. they enforced the no texting law for maybe a year here, then they just started using “I thought I saw them texting” as probable cause to pull over anyone they wanted.

        • Almacca@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          11 hours ago

          They put up cameras to detect phone and seatbelt offences here in Queensland a couple of years ago. It’s been quite lucrative for the state.

      • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I live in PA and I’m not holding my breath for this shit to ever be enforced. I’m a school bus driver and last year I had a local cop pass me when I was stopped with my red flashers on letting kids off the bus. He was driving with one hand and looking at his phone in the other - never even saw me.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m a school bus driver and many of my coworkers use their phones (talking, texting and even doom scrolling) while driving a bus - sometimes even when they have kids aboard. And these buses have internal cameras that are always recording! I don’t understand how they’re not fired or at least suspended for it, but I suppose the driver shortage has something to do with it.

    • Rachelhazideas@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      18 hours ago
      1. The phone is clearly mounted on the dashboard.

      2. It’s not uncommon for people to record their whole trip for social media, not just take to a picture.

      3. This caption could have been pasted over a completely unrelated screenshot of someone else’s video for all we know.

      Don’t touch your phone while driving, but also, don’t believe everything you see on social media.

      • Paddzr@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        18 hours ago

        On your last point… It’s still damaging because it normalises it. UK has very harsh stance on this and you’d get in shit even for point 1. There should be zero tolerance on this. They’re a dickhead driver regardless. Two dickheads don’t make it right.

        • PurplebeanZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Incorrect, in the UK you can touch/use the phone if it’s mounted in a cradle. Touch it un-cradled though and wham that’s instant points even if it was out of battery and turned off

    • mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      tbf, going 20 in a 50 zone is probably not a terrible situation to be multitasking in. not at all like multitasking at 50 in a 50 zone

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Only time I’ve been close to road rage was when a Mercedes CL had a really bright LED strobe light installed inside it’s front grill and he activating it, if somebody was in his way.

    It wasn’t a cop or other emergency vehicle. Just an asshole.

    I was lucky to be in front of him for 15 minutes when traffic got compacted enough to prevent lane change.

    For a moment I considered hitting the brakes on that particular tailgater.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah the one time I tried it I ended up just mucking up my own mirrors and not managing to shine the light back in their eyes

      • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 hours ago

        That works. Also, back when I delivered pizza I kept a rather large LED flashlight in my cupholder all the time, ostensibly for spotting mailboxes and house numbers. (This was back in the day when having a powerful LED flashlight was a big deal, not like nowadays when you can get 3 for $10 on Amazon or whatever.) Pointing it out the back window usually got the point across when asshats felt the need to sit three feet off my back bumper and shine their high beams at me.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Shit if I find myself night commuting again on back roads I might have to keep such a flashlight in my car. I’ve had so many trucks light up my entire fucking cabin with their illegal light mods

          • dual_sport_dork 🐧🗡️@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            10 hours ago

            My attorney has advised me to make no statements whatsoever regarding the applicability of the Lumintop Thor Mini I just bought the other week, which outputs a mere 250 lumens but does so in a narrow cone that’s got, to my reckoning, a divergence of only about four or five degrees.

            I’ll have to do some measuring later, but at rear-windshield-to-asshole distance it’ll only throw a spot that’s probably about a foot wide, delivering maximum fuck you with a minimum of collateral damage.

  • callouscomic@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    1 day ago
    1. Escalates the angry driver situation.
    2. Takes photos while driving.

    Neither driver here is in the right.

      • Zink@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        That’s easy to agree with in isolation, but many times on the main roads near me the normal flow of traffic in the slow lane can be 20 over. Driving at or below the speed limit would create a significantly more dangerous situation than cruising along at the same speed as the nearest several cars.

        Yeah, you’d be operating in a more legal way, and the faster drivers around you should be able to safely deal with it, but that doesn’t mean the risk isn’t there.

        • JasonDJ@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          This. Speed limit laws are bullshit and their selective enforcement is proof of it.

          The dangerous drivers are the ones that are impeding the flow (i.e. going well below the speed limit when road/weather conditions don’t necessitate it; cruising in a passing lane, etc) or driving unpredictably/erratically (cutting people off, weaving, etc).

          Not necessarily the speeders, though there can certainly be some overlap, particularly in the latter group.

          But speeders are the ones that get ticketed over while those asshats just crash into schoolbusses.

        • Ryktes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          10 hours ago

          This is a bullshit talking point used by psychopaths to try to justify their antisocial behavior. If the people around you are going so fast that just doing the speed limit becomes unsafe, they are the ones wholly responsible for creating those unsafe conditions. They are driving faster than the conditions (and let’s be real, their own ability) would reasonably allow for, they are the only ones that should be held responsible for the consequences of their freakish behavior.

      • Stez@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Probably not. It could be in the middle of nowhere or on a road where the speed limit hasn’t been evaluated and the state default is 50. There are tons of roads like that in California or even some where the limit is in the 30s but it really shouldn’t be and locals are in the 60s usually.

        • Darren@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          19 hours ago

          You, The Master Driver, are amply equipped to decide what the true speed limit should be.

        • groet@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Well if you operate a death machine it would be realy nice if you could follow the rules and not kill somebody. Of course the rules should be reasonable but being unable to follow them means you should not be operating a death machine

          • Stez@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            15 hours ago

            There’s no reason to follow unreasonable rules even when you’re driving a death machine. Especially when not following the rules has an essentially near 0 difference in hurting someone with your cage of death(not trying to be sarcastic with cage of death). Many of these roads are designed for much higher speed limits but just have not been evaluated by the government for their speed limit and possibly never will be or they will be evaluated at a much lower than reasonable speed. For example the speed limit of most California freeways is 65 traffic moves at 80 regularly and sometimes when people are feeling frisky up to 90. Neither of those speeds are unreasonable when everyone around you is also doing them and people are used to those situations or understand they will be in those situations. A great example is Germany where parts of their freeways have no speed limit where people are doing in excess of 120 mph and semis are also using it at under 60.

      • GladiusB@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        18 hours ago

        I don’t think losing their license is the right approach. I don’t think scolding them is the approach either. I think most people don’t realize that driving is a cooperative event. And to not only accept that and also expand on it helps most road rage go away.

  • ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Love reading threads about driving cause everyone is very upset for no discernible reason.

  • MycarHolmes@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    137
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    1 day ago

    70 in a 50 zone. Doesn’t matter if its km/h or mph, that’s just idiotic.

      • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        43
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        The engineers only make the designed safe speed. Government officials make the listed limit. It used to be EXTREMELY popular for government official to knock 20-25% off the design limit of the road, ironically so they can tell everyone how safe they were.

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          29
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Traffic engineers in the US make too wide roads that psychologically encourages speeding, the posted speed limit doesn’t matter unless police dedicates significant resources to enforcing it

        • theangryseal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          21 hours ago

          Everywhere in my town was 25mph until about 10 years ago.

          A local politician got a few speeding tickets and went nuts over it, now it varies from 25-60mph. Engineers were brought in to advise on safe limits.

          Him getting those tickets was one of the best things that ever happened to me. It was so miserable driving so slow on big open roads. I could probably sit down and figure up an insane amount of time I’ve saved over the last decade (if I weren’t an idiot).

          • teuniac_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Not so great for people walking or cycling though. Higher speeds mean more serious and fatal collisions.

            Where these modes of transport mix, 20mph is becoming the default choice in western European countries, there is a global declaration on this. If roads feel like they’re made for higher streets: that’s bad infrastructure design.

            https://www.fiafoundation.org/news/stockholm-declaration-focuses-on-reducing-urban-speed

            • theangryseal@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              No one is traveling on a bicycle or walking here. These roads are empty, there’s nothing there. I live in one of the most rural places in the country (United States).

              It was seriously 20 miles straight with no houses, wide road, 25 mph. In residential areas there are still 25 mph speed limits.

              On our 4 lane road, bicycles are not allowed, yet the speed limit was only 35-40.

              Where there are sidewalks, the speed limit is 25 mph. If there are buildings, 25 mph.

              Empty roads with nothing but fucking trees should not be 25 mph.

              In all of my years driving on those roads, I don’t even think I’ve ever seen a bicycle. A couple of those tiny, slow motorcycles, maybe. I guess they call them scooters

              • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                6 hours ago

                And why do you think this is the case? Could it possibly be because the infrastructure is completely designed for cars, and using anything else is just not safe so you’d have to be a madman to go with these options?

                Imran sure, I get rural, cars are good for rural areas, but not for towns etc.

                • theangryseal@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  10 minutes ago

                  Well, I mean, if a person wants to ride a bike 40 miles for 4 1/2 hours to the nearest Walmart I’m sure they could.

                  About 4,500 people live here and most of them have cars or they’re stuck.

                  We have public transit but about 30 people use it. My neighbor said it’s a 2.5 hour ordeal to go to the post office when he could be there and back in 20 minutes in a car. He got old and lost his license.

      • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 hours ago

        Engineers should absolutely include traffic calming features to get people to naturally slow down, but everyone should drive the limit.

        Speed kills, kinetic energy is not linear.

        Cars are tonnes of metal hurtling down the road. Thousands upon thousands die every year, and since the increased prevalence of massive US style trucks fatalities have RISEN, undoing decades of progress. (Both in the US, and elsewhere)

        People driving 20 over the limit are arseholes (or have been influenced by car centric infrastructure and culture). Change my mind.

        Speeding is never okay. Just that lots of people have convinced themselves it’s no big deal.

        Edit because of downvotes: https://www.bts.gov/content/motor-vehicle-safety-data

        Y’all are really justifying some shitty behaviour. Yeah, I get it, streets are designed shittily, and feels like it’s fine to speed (especially, from what I can see, in the US), but this doesn’t absolve you from doing the right thing.

        Like, if it were 5 (km/h) over, I could perhaps forgive you. But downvoting me for suggesting 20 mph over is arsehole behaviour? You don’t deserve a licence.

        Fuck these carbrains putting their feelings over completely savable lives.

        USA is cooked (and Australia, somewhat cooked, since people are buying ridiculously sized cars here too).

        Don’t speed, you fuckwits. Better yet, take public transport if you live in a city with cilivised transportation (obviously, not your fault if it doesn’t exist).

          • MisterFrog@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            I get this is a joke, but speed limits shouldn’t be set by politicians (which I’m hearing apparently is/was a thing?). Politicians have a role to play in getting regulations standards re-written by people who understand the decades of research on this.

            Speeding is mostly a design issue, but I still expect people actually follow the rules.

            Strong Towns, NotJustBikes, City Beautiful, Practical Engineering, among others have made great videos on this topic.

            A lot of people justify speeding, and it’s kinda dumb, if you ask me.

            Just because you “feel” it’s safe, doesn’t mean it actually is.

            Plus, there’s a fantastic way to reduce road deaths, just have fewer cars, switch to public transport, but that takes a long time to implement if the political will doesn’t exist.

    • klemptor@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      I disagree. There are two roads near me with a limit of 55 mph, and traffic on those roads regularly moves at 75-80. Driving 55 becomes dangerous when all of the other traffic is going so much faster, because nobody expects you to be that slow. You risk getting rear-ended, and if traffic is heavy, people who end up behind you now have to merge into a much faster lane of traffic to get around you.

      • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        19
        arrow-down
        27
        ·
        1 day ago

        Why don’t they confiscate driving licences and imprison all the criminals who are driving 20-25mph dangerously over the limit?

        • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          If everyone is driving that fast and there aren’t accidents happening consistently then the posted limit does not reflect the reality of the road.

          • teuniac_@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            6 hours ago

            Or the road design doesn’t facilitate compliance with the speed limit. This is how policy and guidance on road infrastructure talks about these issues.

          • AreaKode@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            14
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            24 hours ago

            A single cop car on the side of the road can get everybody to magically follow the speed limit.

          • fakeman_pretendname@feddit.uk
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Not personally, no - but the police would only need to catch a handful each day to get things moving a little more safely in the area.

        • klemptor@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          22 hours ago

          Throw people in jail for driving too fast? That seems pretty extreme.

          It’s hard to police speeding on a highway. Typically if you do get pulled over for speeding, it’s because you’re going way faster than those around you. So even in a 55, if everyone’s doing 80, you’ve gotta be doing 95 or more for a cop to single you out and arrest you. (Or maybe the cop has a quota to meet.) And where I live, local cops can’t use radar, so it’s hard to prove how fast you were going.

          And then if you do get arrested, you’re most likely to get a ticket and points on your license. Get enough points and they’ll take away your license, but that means you’ve been caught repeatedly. And points expire eventually, plus if you go to your court date and plead not guilty, a lot of the time the judge will just remove the points. So a speeding ticket from years ago generally won’t have any bearing on your life except for the cost of the ticket.

          So within reason, you can pretty much speed all the time consequence-free ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

        • kameecoding@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          24 hours ago

          Because the road design at fault, not people.

          Make roads narrower, and people will drive slower

    • sunbrrnslapper@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      I live out in the sticks, and if I don’t go 70, it will take me forever to get where I need to go. Also everyone else is going 70, so the people doing 50 are creating an unsafe situation. It’s the wild west out here.