In the United States, I’d probably name Oregon City, the famous end of the Oregon Trail and the first city founded west of the Rocky Mountains during the pioneer era. Its population is only 37,000.

  • Enkrod@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    17 minutes ago

    Ramstein, population ~5600

    Famous for the Ramstein Air base, the bombing of the air base, the Ramstein air show disaster and the band named after all of that.

  • Fondots@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 minutes ago

    For the US, I’d say a pretty strong contender is Woodstock, NY, with a population of around 6,000, and of course famous for the music festival of the same name (even though the actual festival was something like 60 miles away in Bethel)

  • UndercoverUlrikHD@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    59 minutes ago

    Edit: I just realised the question was recognising the name of the city, not recognising city based on a picture…

    Probably Svolvær/Lofoten with a population of ~4700. It doesn’t have the official status of “City” in Norway though.

  • A1kmm@lemmy.amxl.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    By population, and not land area, certain more remote geographic places are well known but have quite a low population. ‘Everyone’ is a high bar, but most adults in Australia would know the following places (ordered from smaller population but slightly less known to higher population):

    • Wittenoom, WA - population 0 - well known in Australia for being heavily contaminated with dangerous blue asbestos (which used to be mined there until the 60s), and having been de-gazetted and removed from maps to discourage tourism to it.
    • Coober Pedy, SA - population 1437 - well known in Australia for its underground homes and opal production.
    • Alice Springs, NT - population 25,912 - well known for being near the centre of Australia in the rangelands (outback) - most larger population centres in Australia are coastal.
  • mingueo@lemmy.eco.br
    link
    fedilink
    Português
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Well, Brazil is such a huge country and there are lots of smallest cities with still huge population.

    Unfornately i would have to say that the smallest one and most famous would probably be because of some recent disaster and one I can remember is Brumadinho. Less than 40k people, a city destroyed after a dam collapsed and a lot of mud flooded everywhere, 5 years ago

  • shapesandstuff@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Wacken, Germany.

    Population: 2110

    Home to one of the biggest metal festivals in the world with something between 70k and 120k people. I think Tickets are limited to 70k currently but the whole area is bascially transformed for a week

  • nfh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Not my country, but what immediately came to mind was one that has global name recognition, and minimal population: Chernobyl.

    It used to have around 12,000 population, but now it’s technically illegal to live nearby, and up to 150 people are estimated to live there today. It’s famous for being toxically irradiated as a result of the worst nuclear disaster in human history

  • oo1@lemmings.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    iThe City of London might be one, it has a very small resident population, but I dont know how many people know that it is a separate city from London. It’s famos for being chock full of c*nts most of the day.

  • Ving Thor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 hours ago

    The village “Wacken” is well known in Germany because they hold one of the worlds largest anual Heavy-Metal festivals. They have a population of around 2000, the festival regularly attracts around 80,000 people.

    • PetteriPano@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      I’d try Bodom, population 0, if other than cities are allowed.

      Or possibly Santa’s village, population 2 (if you exclude the elves)

  • nis@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 hours ago

    In Denmark it’s probably Snave (No English Wikipedia page for it). Population is a whopping 211 people. It was popularized in a series of commercials for a Danish cellular carrier. The concept was so popular that there even was a movie. I haven’t seen it, but the reviews seems to suggest it could be fun to watch… If you are drunk enough.

    The word “snave” in Danish can somewhat be translated to snogging in English. Heavy kissing. Which has led to the city having massive problems with theft of their signs.

  • Philote@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Forks, Washington population of ~7000 made very notable due to the twilight series. Or Astoria, Oregon population of ~10,000 made famous by the Goonies.

  • moreeni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    Chornobyl, Ukraine. “50 thousand people used to live here, now it’s a ghost town”

    There are many more ghost towns now, due to the war. Adviivka, Bakhmut and many others, some small, some relatively big. Everyone has heard of those small cities.

    • thepreciousboar@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      15 minutes ago

      Pretty sure that quote refers to Prypiat. Chornobyl had around 14k people living at the moment of the evacuation, according to wikipedia