

I see nothing of sorts.
Instead what I see is this perpetuated crap about Proton being untrustworthy (they are not) and the CEO being a trump bootlicker (they are not). So this makes me think there’s a dissuasion campaign going on.
Nothing against what you are writing and pointing to. But look at the grander picture.
- The CEO makes a statement against big tech.
- Proton has been a thorn in the eye of big tech by eating into their margins (they don’t sell data and take customers away)
- Proton regularly fights against handing over data and doesn’t provide a back door to govt.
They don’t play along. They disrupt the market and modus operandi of stronger entities. Of course there’s going to be incitement against them.
The “That’s it, I’m not going to use them anymore and you shouldn’t either; here’s an alternative” seemed to spawn from a much lesser “charge” than many of the other usual suspects. Like a knee jerk reaction.
Is Proton perfect? No. Are they doing what they claim to do? Yes. Is it good value for money? Debatable. But they are not what people claim them to be on these posts.
Disclaimer: I have a free tier proton account that I log in to once a year, because I’ve moved on to Disroot for my email and mullvad for VPN.
It’s not that dire, unless you love seeding torrents and you encounter other peers that don’t have port forwarding either, or you are hosting something.