• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    41 minutes ago

    When I had an iPhone 3GS I got in a hot tub with it in my pocket and it died. I let it dry out. Then I very carefully took it apart and found all the little white stickers inside that turn from white to pink when in contact with water. I used a razor blade to remove those stickers without damaging them. I then placed a drop of bleach on each which turned them back to white and let them dry out. I used very tiny amounts of super glue to re-apply them to the exact same positions within the phone and then very carefully reassembled the phone.

    Took the phone into an Apple store. Guy disappeared into the back for about 10 minutes with it. Came back out and said it must have just up and died but he doesn’t know how and gave me a new iPhone.

    Only Apple product I’ve ever owned.

    Fuck you Apple.

  • HalfSalesman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This kind of thing is coming for Android as well once Google has converted it to it’s own walled garden bullshit.

    • freddydunningkruger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Yeah, but are Apple users going to punish Apple for glazing Trump’s tiny manhood by not buying Apple products?

      Tim Apple certainly doesn’t think so.

  • dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    This is why the web is way better than any app store, yes even with the problems of DNS (DIDs becoming more prevalent cant come fast enough though). Any future phones should have a first class web experience imo.

    Edit: I wanna add that browser monopolies are a real threat too. Ladybird is legit on Charlie Kirk’s side aka nonpolitical so not a fan of the outlook there. Would love to see KDE fork chromium/blink with valve money and recreate Konquerer and bring back KHTML (I like irony). Valve even has a fork of CEF (Chromium Embedded Framework, electron uses this as well) because of Steam and its ui being a big web app. KDE then has web apps and add them to Discovery, or you can build qt apps. Make it happen valve! And hire me to help lol

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      It’s how I browse Lemmy - I sometimes forget that my home-pinned app, Voyager, isn’t actually from the app store.

    • wabasso@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m only just learning about this, but don’t the encrypted DNS protocols solve the privacy problem?

      Or do you mean more like not being able to trust a registrar or public DNS server?

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        Usually when people complain about DNS, they’re talking about stability issues. In this case I think he’s pointing out how centralized it is, and how a bad actor could cause significant issues

        At a local level, the most common issue I know of is ISPs blocking sites at the DNS level by feeding in fake information that redirects you to one of the ISP’s blocked/parked domains. Usually implemented to prevent customers going to piracy sites. It’s not much of an issue to subvert currently, as you can simply use any public DNS provider

        That being said, much of that has been consolidated into a dozen or so tech companies. In the current political climate, I could see a coordinated effort happening between those tech companies to block sites deemed non gratis. Obviously there’s still ways to subvert it, but the vast majority of user’s won’t be able to

  • Luffy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    97
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Does anyone remember how the Devs from there didnt want to release for Android because ApPlE iS sOoOo mUcH mOoOrE sEcUrE

    Get rekt.

        • rumba@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Needs to be a website, would be best on i2p, but i fear no one would be able to figure out how to get to it.

          • ubergeek@lemmy.today
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            You can use a I2P proxy for access via the clearnet. Additionally, many people can set up I2P proxies that can only being used to access that site. Take one down, there’s a bajillion others to choose.

            • rumba@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I2P proxy

              With the current political weather, you’re going to want the client anonymity protection. All they need to do is run a handfull of proxies, and they’ll narrow down your house/phone as ICE targets.

              We’re beyond the nahh nahh can’t get me because i’m not sharing illegal files, you’ll get trucked off like the immigrants.

              If they can log you reporting ICE to a website, you’re toast.

    • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      46
      ·
      10 hours ago

      In terms of security alone, iPhones easily beat most Android phones. Which may be a fair argument in favor of iPhones. However, to ignore Apple’s policies and long history of delisting similar apps is delusional.

      • squaresinger@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        25
        ·
        8 hours ago

        In regards to security, Apple does have three upsides, and only those:

        • No sideloading and no unlocked bootloader means you can’t sideload malware or install malware-preloaded ROMs. No root also means you can’t just install malware that uses root access.
        • Long OS support means fewer people run around with iPhones that are 5 OS versions behind.
        • There’s no tiny boutique iPhone manufacturers who sell phones that come pre-loaded with malware.

        The solution for the first one is “don’t sideload untrusted stuff” and the solution to the second and third one is “buy an Android phone from a trusted manufacturer that has long term OS support”.

        • Taldan@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          No sideloading and no unlocked bootloader means you can’t sideload malware or install malware-preloaded ROMs

          It’s a simple configuration change to disable it and can be done with any corporate MDM system, making this a moot point. Not to mention too many people don’t understand security, so Android is taking away sideloading anyway, FoR sEcUriTY

          No root also means you can’t just install malware that uses root access

          The vast majority of Android phones do not come with root access. For both, you generally have to elevate access yourself

          Long OS support means fewer people run around with iPhones that are 5 OS versions behind

          If you’re running an out-of-date OS, clearly security is not a priority

          There’s no tiny boutique iPhone manufacturers who sell phones that come pre-loaded with malware

          Supply chain attacks absolutely can happen to iPhones as well. There are plenty of re-sellers


          You missed the actual security benefit over iOS that Android cannot compete with: Apple controls the entire software chain from security patch to OTA update. This allows them to patch and release a fix for critical vulnerabilities far faster than any Android device possibly could. Apple does not need to get the approval of an OEM (such as Samsung), and, due to special deals, they do not need to get the approval of a carrier (like Verizon). Android devices typically need to get approvals from both before releasing updates (although Google flagship phones can bypass one, and can fast track the other)

          The downside there is there are no checks on Apple. They could release a horribly vulnerable patch with no additional checks in-between

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            You don’t seem to get my point and seem to think that I’m some apple fanboy that you need to convince or win against.

            I use android, I’ve never used iOS. I enjoy the freedom of sideloading. Still it is a fact that the overwhelming majority of malware infections on Android happen due to side loading. The percentage of devices running corporate MDM is tiny, making this a moot point.

            The vast majority of Android phones do not come with root access. For both, you generally have to elevate access yourself

            And yet quite a few devices in the wild run rooted or custom ROMs.

            If you’re running an out-of-date OS, clearly security is not a priority

            You seem to forget what this thread is about. It’s not about personal security and whether one can run a safe android device, but about an app developer not providing an Android version, because the platform as a whole (meaning the average user) is less secure.

            Personal preferences like paying for a new, non-outdated phone don’t really matter for that big picture view.

            Supply chain attacks absolutely can happen to iPhones as well. There are plenty of re-sellers

            That’s a strange argument. Getting malware that survives a factory reset onto an iPhone without apple’s approval is close to impossible. Making an Android phone from scratch that contains malware right in the system image has been done over and over again. You are argueing a hypothetical versus something that happens every day.

        • liuther9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          9
          ·
          8 hours ago

          Long os support meant to intentionally brick your iphone so you buy new. That is 100% true as I had many apple products started degrading after upgrade and still have old models that are not upgraded and work perfectly

          • squaresinger@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            15
            ·
            8 hours ago

            I’m not defending apple here. Short OS support (or none at all) is not a good thing, and it’s something that’s sadly still quite common if you buy the wrong Android brand.

            Samsung is doing pretty well in that regard right now.

      • Taldan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        In terms of security alone, iPhones easily beat most Android phones

        That’s not how security works in the modern tech landscape. No major OS is going to meet a high security standard out of the box. All of them have to be configured to the desired security level, then be added to ongoing security efforts. Every major OS can be secured to the highest security standards

        The primary difference is how much effort each takes, but even then there isn’t much of a difference. You’ll find tooling and in-house expertise makes a much larger difference than the OS

        The myth that some OS are inherently secure really needs to die off

        • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Every major OS can be secured to the highest security standards

          Has Android added E2EE to their cloud backups yet like Apple has?

          Apple is no friend to any of us, but Google openly and shamelessly scrapes every piece of data you put on their phones. Apple is absolutely the lesser of these two evils with out of the box functionality. I say this as a lifelong Android fan and Apple hater that entered the cybersecurity space and am only interested in the most private option I can get out of the box.

          Like an Android can be more secure and private than an IPhone, but afaik that involves owning a Pixel specifically and installing an entirely different OS on it, one that Google a Is also out to get.

          • Xatolos@reddthat.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            3 hours ago

            You do know that Apple privately scrapes every piece of data you put on their phones right? Go read the privacy and ad policies. Apple also gives access to a lot of their users private information (China has full access to its users iCloud), will remove apps like this (while Google still allows apps that block ad trackers like DuckDuckGo that block Google own trackers). And Google supports CSE.

            We get it from your post, your a huge and blind Apple fan that wants to do anything you can to confuse others into believing falsely like you that Apple is somehow a great company and product. But the truth is, Apple doesn’t care about your privacy, lies to your face about it, and makes you less secure and your information less private as these situations show. And if you were in cybersecurity, you’d know this.

            • Encrypt-Keeper@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              3 hours ago

              I’m not much of an Apple fan, I just like to get my privacy where I can. And with over a decade of experience in cybersecurity I can confidently say that as much as you shouldn’t blindly trust Apple, they at least give you a number of tools to increase your privacy out of the box.

              Android on the other hand is a nightmarish hellscape of data mining and user profiling. There is GrapheneOS which is as of today a great option to circumvent Google’s data mining, but now that its future is at stake I worry for the future of privacy on Android devices.

              But we get it from your post, you’re a pro-Google shill bot that didn’t actually read my comment and is just regurgitating nonsense to muddy the waters.

        • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          16
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Based on most smartphones being very insecure. Of course, iPhones aren’t extremely secure, but the competition is practically nonexistent. Pretty much the only secure Android phones are Pixels. Samsung is considered one of the more secure manufacturers too, but according to GrapheneOS devs it’s still way behind Google.

          Note that even police and government agencies sometimes have trouble getting into iPhones. They never have such troubles getting into Android smartphones, except Pixels.

          This is by no means meant to advertise iPhones. It’s just a simple observation that security in smartphones is heavily lacking.

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Both iPhones and Android phones can be configured to your desired security level. Both are used by various government agencies around the world for their most important secrets. Neither are secure out of the box. You have to harden them to your desired level of security

            Arguing whether Android or iOS is more secure is a bit like arguing whether an SUV or pickup is safer. It doesn’t matter which you pick when basic security steps are magnitudes more important: Wearing a safety belt, having a functioning air bag, driving a safe speed, not driving drunk, etc.

          • Potatar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            8 hours ago

            Dude give one example so we can google and have our own opinion. You are just saying “because they said so/because someone considered it so”.

  • RandomlyGeneratedName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    81
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    This shouldn’t be on the app store. It gives the US government too much access to pull data from it, or order it pulled down. This should be a web app hosted outside the US that can be accessed by any device and can be obscured by VPN access so the regime can’t persecute participants. Apps pull way too much data from phones that ICE can subpoena.

    • Taldan@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Disclaimer: The app is closed source, so all we can go off is the developer’s word, although the fact the government removed it is a strong indicator they don’t have access to data from the app

      The developer stated they do not even retain any identifying data, so the only data the government could get is public anyway. Through Apple they’d be able to see who downloaded it, and likely when it was used. Your defense would be easy enough though: “I just wanted to make sure the libs weren’t harassing our fascist patriotic ICE agents near me”

  • Salvo@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    94
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    15 hours ago

    I’m gonna play devils advocate here (and probably be monstrously downvoted);

    ICEBlock stored the location data of all its users on Apples iCloud Servers. This the perfect target for ICE; a complete database of locations of every person who doesn’t want ICE to know where they are.

    One assumption is that that Apple realised how tempting this data is to the current demonstrative administration and purged it before ICE could get their civil-liberty-abusing mitts on it.

      • REDACTED@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Alternate take: Tim is a businessman doing what’s best for Apple and he personally might not support Trump, but we will likely never know.

        • Draedron@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Tim Apple is a billionaire, doing billionaire things. Supporting the people who give him the most power and not giving a fuck about anyone else.

        • ErmahgherdDavid@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          12 hours ago

          Same take my friend. I agree - Tim’s personal politics are kinda irrelevant in this context. Best for apple=compliance with whoever is in charge so they get to keep their money printer. Corpos gonna corpo

        • fodor@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          12 hours ago

          Oh, so you’re trying to say that Tim is so greedy that he doesn’t have values at all, other than his greed? That’s an interesting position, but I think it makes him sound even worse than the previous one.

          • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            10 hours ago

            It’s an inherent byproduct of capitalism.

            If you rise to Tim Cook’s level you must be someone that is either willing to put your personal values aside or you do not have them to begin with. The growth of the company matters more and if you prioritize your values you will be filtered the moment you misalign with whatever prevents maximal growth.

            Capitalism does not care about values, ethics, morals, social wellness, or anything besides growth. It is cancerous and leads to a toxic society that poisons itself and falls apart, which is literally happening

          • REDACTED@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            11 hours ago

            You don’t succesfully run big corporations by having high moral standarts, this was never an argument. Argument was about what makes businessman a good business man, and one major thing is seizing opportunities and “playing” important people like Trump. I don’t think he’s anywhere as (morally) bad as Steve Jobs was, but he’s doing his job as expected.

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Something worth noting, if you are using iCloud, advanced data protection is your friend. Apple doesn’t have the encryption keys, you do.

      This is not on by default.

      • Salvo@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Advanced Data Protection does require all iCloud Ecosystem devices to be current.

        Not every person can afford the latest and greatest.

        • Jesus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It requires iOS 16 and MacOS 13.

          The devices that max out at those operating systems are 9 and 10 year old.

        • prettybunnys@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          5 hours ago

          Current or on a current OS?

          Edit: I just enabled it and I have a iPhone 11 on my iCloud account.

          So, just latest OS.

          Which Apple gives you basically forever instead of maybe a year of old updates with android.

    • brem@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Money is always the answer with these “people”.

      To assume otherwise is to feed the beast

  • Aljernon@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Fuck Apple but honestly this app is like trying to stay warm with matches in Antarctica.

  • sudoer777@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    100
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    16 hours ago

    “Good thing I got revenge though on Google’s sideloading ban by buying a phone that never allowed it to begin with”

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      We should make webapps for everything. When done properly they are as fast as native apps, can work on any device and do not require a dev license or account.

    • baguettefish@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      there are technically alternative marketplaces on iOS in the EU, but they do the exact thing google is now copying off apple: apple still has to give the green light. apple “notarizes” every app, even if it goes through a third party app store. this changes the app irreversibly, and ios/ipados devices can only install notarized apps.

  • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    633
    ·
    20 hours ago

    And this is why having 3rd party app stores is important. It’s why it matters that Google is killing side loading, if two fucking companies get to decide what you can do on your phone, we’re in a bad spot technology wise

      • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        edit-2
        17 hours ago

        We rapidly need to switch to Linux Mobile. PostmarketOS and Mobian are the two most promising projects, and I would highly recommend anyone reading this to donate to them if you have the means.

        Both projects directly use your donations to hire developers to build and polish the critical essentials to get this alternative viable as a daily driver.

        • ISOmorph@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          16 hours ago

          While I full heartily agree with you, I’m pessimistic you will ever reach enough people with these alternatives. Even on privacy forums you hear people fervently defending how banking apps are mandatory. Those will never run on anything that isn’t locked down. The eID proposal for the EU is also dependent on Android and iOS.

          • 0x0@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            10 hours ago

            how banking apps are mandatory.

            This i don’t get, i’d rather use home-banking from my home PC.

            • artyom@piefed.social
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              7 hours ago

              A lot of banks require their personal apps as 2FA to access your account. I would never agree to that.

              • Ofiuco@piefed.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                4 hours ago

                I love how you are getting downvoted for getting frustrated with people who can’t see beyond their own nose.

                I fully agree with you, these people just don’t want to admit some of us don’t have the privilege of choosing since all the options end up on forcing a banking app one way or another.
                Because it is a fucking privilege at this point.

              • sadfitzy@ttrpg.network
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                6 hours ago

                I don’t need to use an app to manage my bank account.

                Sounds like you people have shitty banks. Maybe it’s time to switch?

                • Ofiuco@piefed.ca
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  4 hours ago

                  Sure, come to México and tell me which local bank allows me to not use an app at all and I’ll switch

          • ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            16 hours ago

            It doesn’t necessarily need to achieve mass adoption, it just needs to get to a ‘good enough’ point to make it viable for those who are willing or desperate to get away from big tech.

            Linux still has plenty of people giving reasons why they won’t switch, but it’s now finally viable for many, including myself. I just want mobile Linux to get to that point too, even if there’s still rough edges.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        59
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        And the open source movement is such a blind spot to the ‘left’ as well, even though technology freedom is critical if you want to be able to organise any type of resistance in the digital space.

        Lemmy users largely get it, obviously, but centre left people will happily let themselves get locked into the Apple/Google walled gardens even though you’re just giving that company a ridiculous amount of power over you.

        • Pxtl@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Right? The collective dismissal of Mastodon from leftist influencers when the Muskening happened was eye opening.

          Like, there’s a collaborative, volunteer-based platform right over there. You want mutual aid? Open-source is as mutual-aid as it gets.

          But it’s nerd shit.

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            9 hours ago

            Yeah it’s unhinged, FOSS is as communism in practice as it gets right now and the left just ignores it, dismissing it as “tech bad” because they can only think in AnPrim brainrot terms most of the time and judge only by aesthetics and make sweeping generalisations about social media that lack any and all imagination.

          • SOULFLY98@slrpnk.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            Because they are controlled opposition.

            The only time something not controlled got popular was TikTok and you saw how quickly both parties went to ban it in 2024 after normal people started talking about Gaza genocide in every day conversation. The American Congress worked together to ban it even though they couldn’t agree on anything else.

            It went from an Asian platform where Asian people in the West connected with each other outside the mainstream blue pill/red pill false choice and shared culture as well as history that isn’t taught, to “here’s the truth about Jesus” and “the world is flat debate me” after that vote. Now it’s full on MAGA.

            Mastodon is harder to control because servers can pop up organically, but I guess Threads was a hedge against that threat.

            • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              3 hours ago

              The only time something not controlled got popular was TikTok

              I’m not sure what you mean by controlled, but how I got to know it was as the malware that’s recommended to everyone on the front page of the google play store, and then even factory preinstalled on a lot of them.

          • shrugs@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Also, on xitter are all these assholes I don’t care about. I can’t leave that platform. Pathetic!

        • Default Username@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          16 hours ago

          I originally got introduced to sociallist idiology through Richard Stallman’s speaches. I know he had some, uhh… “interesting” things to say about Epstein’s victims (which I believe he has since redacted), but his speaches are absolutely still worth listening to just for the content alone.

        • shrugs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          17 hours ago

          People will never understand intricacies like that. On the other hand, the big tech corps do. We are doomed

          • LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            Yeah. And to think, it’s a fairly small amount of nuance - it’s very basic and intuitive and information about it is literally everywhere. We are hopeless when it comes to far more complex and nuanced social issues we face like rehabilitation or ethnocentrism or trans athletes or the what have you.

            People seem to think socialism and any progress is like “be nice to each other” or some stupid aestheticism about “empathy”.

            There’s basically no way to have a conversation with them most of the time, they are so far gone and their fully formed thoughts seem more like inaccurate shorthands, it’s like trying to explain astrodynamics to a dog when it’s actively trying not to understand them.

            Normies are the death of us all.

      • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        68
        ·
        20 hours ago

        No doubt. I’ve gotten to the point where I have like 6 apps on my phone and it’s in lockdown mode on iOS. And I’d be on grapheneOS if I wasn’t required to use iOS for work.

        • jqubed@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          61
          ·
          20 hours ago

          Can you have your job pay for an iPhone while you have a different personal phone? I’m a big fan of keeping a work device that’s separate from a personal device.

          • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            54
            ·
            20 hours ago

            I probably could, but I’m also a recovering drug addict and my partner is pretty hesitant about a second device as it’s another way to hide things. However I’m the head of the MDM team so I’m not really nervous about what the company can see

            • fascicle@leminal.space
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              47
              ·
              19 hours ago

              I thought you were head of the MDMA team for a second and thought that could be rough as a recovering drug addict

                • MynameisAllen@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  21
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  Oddly I’ve only tried MDMA a few times and it never really worked. There’s some anecdotal evidence that it doesn’t work for those with bipolar which I do have, that might be the one drug I could be in charge of with no temptation actually

      • FauxLiving@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yeah, people should have listened to the people warning of privacy concerns with online services. Now that your data is valuable, companies will do anything to extract it from you.

        Stop using those products, de-Google, install Linux, use self-hosted solutions.

        It will take some effort to switch. You get to decide how much effort you’re willing to expend in order to not sacrifice all of your privacy and control of your digital lives.

        • jonne@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Oh yeah, of course, but it feels like it’s never part of the conversation, even among people whose opinions I respect and are, for example, super critical of AI and talking about enshittification and other issues in the online sphere, they never seem to take the step to check out Linux, or get off Twitter or whatever.

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      127
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      19 hours ago

      “Sideloading” is their term, invented to make it sound like something it is not. We should not use this word. The correct word is “installing”.

      You don’t “sideload” on Windows when you install software outside of the Microsoft Store™️. There is no real difference or distinction with software on phones, so there is no need for a special word.

      • jonne@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I can see Microsoft moving to the same sort of thinking as well. Apple already made Mac OS users jump through hoops when you want to install something from the internet or even through a third party package manager like homebrew.

      • blargh513@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Not to defend it, but the first time I encountered the term was when BlackBerry released their Playbook tablet. It ran their bbos10 and they created an android emulator so you could run some android apps. The process of installing the apk into the emulator was called sideloading.

        I miss BlackBerry is all I really wanted to say.

      • B-TR3E@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        16 hours ago

        “Install” includes installing from an app store no matter how closed down and exlusive. The correct term would be “install from other sources than an app store” which is just clunky. Calling it “sideloading” won’t change that nor will calling it “your mom”. Considering how many corporate-speak terms are in use and how many braindead abbreviations and terms shortened to a word’s last syllable -completely distorting the original meaning- generally are in use, the term “sideloading” is pretty irrelevant. Either lose your mind listening to the bullshit people permanently are emitting or just live with it…

        • 0x0@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          10 hours ago

          the term “sideloading” is pretty irrelevant.

          No, it’s not.
          “Installing” is innocuous and easily understandable (by those tech-illiterate dumbfucks that get spoonfed FUD by lobbyists); whereas sideloading is eerily similar to sidestepping and is prone to being interpreted as “working around a safeguard”.

          Words are not irrelevant.

          • burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            5 hours ago

            Right? Anyone who has been paying attention to the healthcare thing in america should know that what you call something influences immensely what people think about something. Just look at the difference in support in polling when they call it the affordable healthcare act OR obamacare.

    • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      19 hours ago

      If people were more aware of how to make and install mobile web apps it would be less of a problem.

      At least on the iPhone you can still add a site to your screen that can behave a lot like an app, including camera access, location services, and even gyro. And it’s just a website like most “apps” are.

    • kender242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      17 hours ago

      “Hurd OS? Isn’t that obsolete?” “Not obsolete. Just… illegal.” ~Rainbows End by Vernor Vinge

    • Jesus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Honestly, this thing should just been a PWA. Making this naive app was dumb.

    • artyom@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      34
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Google is not killing sideloading. If the dev is willing to submit to Apple for verification, they’d probably not object to submitting it to Google.

      E: downvotes for facts, I guess? 🤷

      • 0x0@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Google is not killing sideloading. If the dev is willing to submit

        I see…

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Yes, and then they ban that developer and their apps. It doesn’t matter you can install apps outside of the Play Store, if Google still controls which apps you are allowed to install.

  • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    59
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Who could have seen this coming from the company whose CEO gifted Trump a literal gold plaque in celebration of his reelection?