• AItoothbrush@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Well that is because i would have to install it first because i dont have chrome. Librewolf(firefox fork) for the win! Also i have a shorcut for the browser so its literally faster than most people on other systems. I just press super+w

  • DirkMcCallahan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    ·
    13 hours ago

    “Do you want to import your settings from your previous browser?”

    “Do you want to make Chrome your default browser?”

    “Are you sure?”

    FUCK OFF, I’M ONLY USING THIS STUPID PROGRAM BECAUSE MY ASSHOLE UTILITY COMPANY’S WEBSITE DOESN’T WORK WITH FIREFOX

    • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      63
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Try user agent switcher. More often than not, websites work just fine with firefox but refuse to load when the browser identifies as not-fascist-google-trash.

      • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Had to do that to do my fucking MATH HOMEWORK because Pearson “doesn’t work with Linux”. Switched my user agent to windows and all of a sudden it works just fine

          • klu9@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            13
            ·
            9 hours ago

            I wish Mozilla would use some of their millions to bring a class action lawsuit against sites that pointlessly lock people out just because they’re not using Chrome/Safari/Edge.

            • raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              11 hours ago

              These companies typically have management take the IT advice from their IT managers, and if those intentionally block non Windows/Google/fascist software, you don’t find anyone in the organization willing to listen to you. The only way to fight this is by not doing business with them whenever avoidable.

      • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        11 hours ago

        It sure would be nice to have WebSerial as well. For some reason Mozilla seems to think users can’t be trusted with it. They could at least add a compile time option to enable it. If someone knows how to compile a browser, they are probably smart enough not to give random websites access to their devices.

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    10 hours ago

    If anything, I only use ungoogled chromium if a website refuses to work in Firefox. Had a financial fraud and identity theft scam the other day hosted on a Singaporean form service thing that I had to report using that browser because the send report button wasn’t working on FF.

    As much as I don’t like it, it’s probably a good idea to have a backup chromium based browser like ungoogled chromium just in case. Just be sure to not be like me and actually have it in some sort of sandbox rather than running the flatpak on its own.

    • klu9@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I was under the impression Flatpaks are sandboxed. (I am not an expert.)

      Flatpak is a utility for software deployment and package management for Linux. It provides a sandbox environment in which users can run application software in (partial) isolation from the rest of the system.

      I also keep Ungoogled Chromium around as a last resort (AppImage in my case).

        • ddh@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          36 minutes ago

          Even the author says Flatpak is a sandbox.

          The most simple but also least effective sandbox type is the container or wrapper sandbox that builds an isolated process environment and then executes the target application inside.

          Flatpak provides an isolated runtime environment using a container type sandbox to execute the target application inside.

          … there are two issues that prevent flatpak from providing a real sandbox environment…

          Just that it’s no true scotsman, I mean sandbox.

      • monogram@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 hours ago

        Flatpaks are as sandboxed as the sandbox settings you give them, check out if the defaults are satisfactory on Flatseal before running it.

  • jia_tan@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    96
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    A windows user downloading a random executable and unchecking all of the boxes that install malware (it is easier than pressing one “Install” button in an app store):

    • webghost0101@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      47
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      13 hours ago

      I switched my main to linux about a year ago and install everything through terminal at this point.

      I had to download something on a windows system once recently and i was not prepared with how backwards this entire process felt.

      I cant understand how i had stuck with such bullshit for so long.

    • Monstrosity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Windows users removing spyware and telemetry while bragging about not having to touch a terminal.

    • SatyrSack@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      A Linux user running random commands to add a new repo that points to malware (their package manager does not have the program they want by default)

      Note: I just did this to install Librewolf, Mullvad, and VS Codium

    • cygnus@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Based on the nonsensical chest computer/armour and other garbled elements of the image I’m going to assume it’s AI-generated.

      • pitiable_sandwich540@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I mean, have you ever looked at Start Trek costumes closely? Shit’s wild…

        Also it’s quite grainy and the handle-thingy in the front (bottom right) is out of focus. Not sure AI can be this imperfect yet, though it’s just a matter of time.

      • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Look at the red buttons by the guy’s right hand. They look like a bunch of skittles of different sizes. It is definitely AI

          • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            12 hours ago

            Even cheaply you can still easily find something to make buttons that are of a consistent size and shape. And not put one of them on top of the edge panel of the console like one of them is on the picture. This is a typical telltale sign of AI: things that aren’t uniform when they should be and are located in nonsensical places.

            There is also asymmetry and sewing lines that make no sense between the left and right gloves and what looks like is supposed to be a pair of pens on his upper right arm is just two nonsensical blobs of crome texture.

            No one seems to know about what movie or show this is supposed to be from either…