Jerkface (any/all)

Because it’s not an issue. This is the system functioning as intended. Changing this behaviour would cause dramatic performance degradation for the 99.999% of the time when the device you are writing to isn’t removable media that you want to eject right away.

deleted by creator

The foot bears more than 100% of your weight because it is cantilevered. The greater the cantilever, the greater the multiplier to the weight.

You’re arguing that a small foot has a small contact patch. But we need to be able to shift all our weight to our toes, and that contact patch is more a function of the width of your foot, not the length.

Because it’s cheap greebling. https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GbK_98uXAAAaD0I.jpg

Looks more like a late 80s movie to me. I assure you, we did not need AI to generate our nonsense for us.

Last week I saw an East Asian guy with sleeves and neck. That hits different.

The feet might not change, but shoe sizes are not consistent. Even two shoes of the same make, model, and size can differ. When your feet are very small, the tolerances are also very small.

The foot is a lever. A shorter lever has to bear less load.

You know it’s become a personal beef when you know the trade name of the device that insults you.

I mean his ICE issues don’t go away. He could spend 20 years in jail and THEN get deported.

escape?

Congratulations. This is oniony.

Even if this were true, it does not address the moral argument that is at the root of this discussion. It’s a way that you distract yourself from the moral component of your choices. It doesn’t matter if it’s true or not, it doesn’t even matter if you believe it or not. It just has to distract you long enough that you get past the point where you might accidentally engage your empathy, and have a feeling you don’t want to have.

Where are you getting your information?

The majority of all the plants that humans grow are fed to livestock. That’s just the fact of the matter. It’s not conserving anything, rather it’s incredibly wasteful. Human food crops could have been grown instead, on a fraction of the land.

And again, you don’t really give a shit. It wouldn’t change your behaviour to discover you are mistaken, it’s a disingenuous argument. It’s sophistry.

Gaslighting

That’s willful self-delusion.

This is not true. The vast majority of farmed animals come from high intensity operations and the vast bulk of the food they eat is grown agriculturally. This is one of those happy little lies people repeat to themselves without verifying because it provides them with a shred of moral license. They don’t really care whether it’s true or not and finding out it is false won’t change their behaviour, it’s a totally facile argument.

Pull requests have nothing to do with any of this.

Disagree. That’s exactly the thing you want to receive from these corporations.

So under GPL, they can use my algorithm, but not my code. So they run it through ChatGTP. What has been gained??

Guns don’t defend against guns.

Edit: People who have to deal with the public who might be armed don’t do it with a gun in their hand, they do it behind bulletproof glass. The odds that a given gun is going to shoot a bad guy moments before the bad guy shoots a good guy are a fraction of the odds that that same gun will be used to accidentally kill a child.

Of course there are reasons. Maybe you are more concerned with your innovated algorithm being taken up for the benefit of humanity than you are about your ego project getting lots of pull requests.

Amazing how many plants rights advocates pop up every time someone mentions the cruelty and violence being endured by farm animals.