You say “apple” to me and I’m #1, glossy skin, insides, all that

And how in the hell does one navigate life, or enjoy a book, if they’re not a #1?! Reading a book is like watching a movie. I subconsciously assign actor’s faces to characters and watch as the book rolls on.

Yet #5’s are not handicapped in the slightest. They’re so “normal” that mankind is just now figuring out we’re far apart on this thing. Fucking weird.

EDIT: Showed this to my wife and she was somewhat mystified as to what I was asking. Pretty sure she’s a 5. I get frustrated as hell when I ask her to describe a thing and she’s clueless. “Did the radiator hose pop off, or is it torn and cracked?” “I don’t know!”

EDIT2: The first Star Wars book after the movie came out was Splinter in the Mind’s Eye. I feel like I got that title. What’s it mean to you?

  • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Is this new, somehow? I’ve always recognized that the people around me think differently. I even recognized that there was a spectrum.

    I’m definitely a #1, and always recognized that about myself. I’m like to write, and I think that activity demonstrates the spectrum well. Stephen King once said that he doesn’t understand why people struggle with writing. He just pictures the story in his head, and writes what he sees. When I read that, I instantly recognized myself. That’s how I write.

    But I also know that some people write almost like they are putting together a puzzle. They choose certain words that go together well, and they are constructing their narrative brick by brick. I think poetry is often constructed like that, and I think those prose writers have a more poetic sensibility than others, and that sort of writing reflects it. That might explain why I really don’t care for that style of writing much, because I am extremely bad at poetry. That construction style just doesn’t work for me.

  • niktemadur@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Considering your specific example with an apple, what about other senses, what happens if you try and recall texture, smell and taste?

  • ZkhqrD5o@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Do you guys sometimes also get the weird feeling of: “this is my body, this is planet earth, this is my flat and I live here.” Sometimes that happens. And when that happens, I usually think about things like how the universe came to be the big bang, the laws of physics fighting each other until settling on a seady state. Then the Earth is created, millions of years of evolution go by and here you are, sitting on the toilet. The entire chain of thought only lasts for about five seconds and then you’re again stuck with the feeling of “I am back here on planet Earth”. Do you guys also get that sometimes?

    • I Cast Fist@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Kinda? I usually drift about how the hell we even reached our current situation from the beginning of the universe; how, despite being a huge collection of cells and bacteria, we understand ourselves as a single unit

  • tree_frog_and_rain@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    Your mind has an active visual cortex. Other folks think more using their audio cortex. Some more with somatic awareness (feeling tone).

    Mathameticians can visualize math.

    Everyone is wired a bit different.

    I’m a two or a four on the scale, depending on how much weed I consume. As heavy weed use dulls the minds eye. Though irregular use can enhance it.

    And after years working in kitchens, I can think in smells. I.e.mix spices in my mind and smell them in my head before adding to a dish.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      And after years working in kitchens, I can think in smells. I.e.mix spices in my mind and smell them in my head before adding to a dish.

      I’m that way with ice cream. I own an ice cream business that creates custom ice creams, and after many years, I can think of a a flavor combination, and sort of “taste it” in my mind.

      I love ice cream, but I don’t eat it that often any more. If I have a craving, often just thinking about what flavor I’d have is satisfying enough, but I don’t really need to eat the ice cream.

      I just did it as an experiment, and imagined a combo of honey, cinnamon, and cayenne pepper. My mouth watered, but after a moment of really concentrating on what that flavor would taste like, I felt fairly satisfied enough about experiencing the taste, that I don’t feel a need to actually eat the ice cream. I think my brain has trained itself to release ice cream endorphins based on the thought alone, and not the actual taste experience from my tongue, and that satisfies my craving.

      I should write a diet book: “Think And Grow Thin.”

  • Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I can’t actually see the image with my eyes, I don’t believed people actually can but I suppose it can be. I can see flashes of black and white stills in my mind but that’s it. My dreams are the same just with weirdly numb feelings. Like when you are in vr and someone touches you, you have the feeling in your mind but don’t feel anything physical.

    • alternategait@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I’m on the very realistic visualization end of these and I wouldn’t say that I see anything with my eyes when I’m visualizing. It’s more like I have a viewing room in my mind that I can expand, or push away as I need, in a similar way that I can change the volume of the voices in my mind.

  • Emi@ani.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    @/u/KoboldCoterie you can still be an artist. You’ll just have to rely more on references but it’s possible. There’s one person that made a video about it that I saw some time ago. https://youtu.be/ewsGmhAjjjI

    • MoonRaven@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Same here. Had plenty of argument with teachers when I said I couldn’t really visualize things… I just had to “close my eyes and try harder”. Glad this kind of information is more out there now.

  • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    My brain is like a vector database, it stores the “feelings” of information, not the actual information - if that makes sense?

    I can make lightning fast connections in my head when something happens, like when something breaks in production, I see the symptoms and the vectors just connect from effect to the cause.

    Can I explain to others why and how I know where the problem is? Nope. …Or yes, but it’ll take a long time for me to follow the feeling-vectors and put them into words I can actually communicate to other people.

    For actual people and characters in books I also retain the shape and …something about them, but I couldn’t explain how most people in my life look like to a sketch artist.

    When I read a book, I kinda retain the “feeling” of the characters and maybe one or two visual traits. I can read thousands of pages of a character’s adventures and I can maybe tell you their general body type and clothing - if they have an “uniform” they tend to wear.

    I’ve read all 5 books (over 5000 pages) of The Stormlight Archive and I couldn’t tell you what Kaladin (the main character) looks like. I have no visual recollection of his hair colour, eye colour, skin tone or body type.

    It always baffled me when a movie adaptation of a book came out and people were really upset that the characters looked wrong. And I was just “… you remember what the people in books look like??”. It turns out they do.

    Oh, and DEFINITELY no voice in my head. I’d get myself committed if I had someone talking to me in my brain.

  • the_q@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    91
    ·
    13 hours ago

    You guys are gonna lose your shit when you find out some people don’t have an inner monologue.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      6 hours ago

      This one I find difficult to comprehend.

      My inner monologue is petty much my entire thought process. How does one think and rationalise without one?

      • alternategait@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        I’m a 5 on this scale (maybe a 4 1 on this scale (maybe a 2 if I’m distracted, processing other stuff) and I have a big component of kinesthetic sense and some emotional tone comes into play. It actually often takes work for me to turn ideas into words. This gets harder if I’m tired or sick or something.

        Edits: I forgot the actual anchors.

    • Glide@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      44
      ·
      11 hours ago

      What the fuck do you mean some people don’t have an inner monologue. How do they… Think thoughts? I literally cannot comprehend how they work through thoughts.

      • rhombus@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Probably different for everyone, but I have neither and sometimes feel almost compelled to speak my thoughts out loud. If I don’t speak them they’re just kind of abstract feelings or impressions.

        • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          7 hours ago

          Literally everyone does this tho. It only feels like everyone else because you can’t be aware of when you’re not thinking.

          • saimen@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            7 hours ago

            No, having kids now I am sometimes super tired only being able to function for the daily activities without much planning and thinking about others. This made me realize this state (or even worse) is probably normal for a lot of people.

          • Hugin@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            3 hours ago

            That’s me. Best way I can describe it is like a word cloud but no text or dialog. A bunch of concepts with varying importance and strength of connections.

            • TheHotze@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              48 minutes ago

              Me too. I think in the connections between ideas. Almost like thinking in metaphor. Also OP said they were surprised aphantasia is not a disability, but thinking without senses is way faster, you don’t need to think in a straight line, but can just think a clump of thoughts at once.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      That should be my next post! 😂 My inner monologue is like words on a page. And again, I can’t see how one could enjoy a novel with the monologue and mind’s eye.

  • Drekaridill@lemmy.wtf
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    7 hours ago

    I play DND with a “theatre of the mind” battle system (no map or miniatures, we just remember where we are) with a a dude who’s a 5 and I have no idea how he does it.

    • absGeekNZ@lemmy.nz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I play DnD with a lot of theatre or the mind. I’m a 5 (also 5 with all other mental sensors).

      It isn’t to hard, you just remember the description, the detail and context.

      If the story is engaging, it is easy.

      I’m a big fan of story, some writers rely too much on imagery, great writers story transcends the imagery.

      E.g. I can’t stand Tolkien, too much time describing (for me) pointless visual detail. Love Pratchett’s work, the story and subtext are amazing.

    • Mondoshawan@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      It’s more of a spectrum with hyper- and a- phantasia being the extremes on each end

      (Prophantasia is considered the ability to project imagined images into your physical field of view)

      If you really want to blow your mind (heh), you should check out SDAM (Severely Deficient Autobiographical Memory), which is thought to be linked to aphantasia

      • Potential Piñata@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        8 minutes ago

        Wow. I didn’t know about the term “prophantasia” until now. Probably because I think that visualizing things in our 3d world is a normally developed imagination power of the people who don’t have Aphantasia.

        Prophantasia seems like biologically evolved Augmented Reality. Where instead of wearing a piece of AR glass, We’re naturally born with this trait.

        I can pull out my palm in front of me and visualize a small cat jumping around. Not for too long because I cannot imagine the random movement a cat does. But, as a still object, visualizing an apple is easy.

        I am more curious to wonder if someone can manually develop Spatial Intelligence without being born with it priorly.

    • shalafi@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      30
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yep! Craziest thing is that we just started looking into this thing in the past 10-20 years. Proof to me that it’s no handicap, but if you took my mind’s eye away I’d feel crippled.

      • Goodeye8@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        It has its benefits. You can talk absolute depravity, like Trump farting so much shit into Ivankas mouth that liquid diarrhea is overflowing from the side of her mouth with chunks of yesterday’s pasta bolognese dangling off her chin, and get no mental image of that filth. But you can enjoy that imagery.

        • turdcollector69@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          I’m probably 1 but I can tune stuff out.

          Stuff like “you are now manually breathing” doesn’t really bother me.

          I’ve also got a lot of intrusive thoughts so maybe I’m just practiced at shutting it down.

  • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I’m not as puzzled about the concept of aphantasia (or the opposite) as much as the fact that people here, and two I know IRL, always self report as either 1s or 5s, with a handful of exceptions (ATTOW).

    Is there a selection bias, where anyone in-between doesn’t relate to either extreme enough to comment, or do said extremes conflate the ability to “picture” fine details with the ability to remember them in the first place?

    • SlurpingPus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Well, if it makes anyone feel better, I’m somewhere around 2 or 3. But that’s really nothing to write about.

    • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I’m noticing that in this comment section, too. I hadn’t noticed before, but most people do seem to be one extreme or the other. I imagine it’s because at either end they feel like they have something unique to offer the conversation, but those in the middle probably feel as if they are normal and it won’t be interesting to contribute, maybe?

      Ooc, what would you label yourself? I posted mine if you want to see my experience as someone who jumps around the spectrum a bit

      • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Without rigorously researching the phenomenon, I’d put myself in the 2, edging towards 3 - I can visualize things with however many details I can see with my own eyes if I focus a little, but instinctually I only see vague shapes that serve their purpose in whatever scenario I’m thinking of.
        I can rotate objects and remember the back-face details;
        I can picture a moment from a story I was reading, where a bipedal nocturnal lizard in a cramped spaceship violently recoils from having a flashlight pointed at its eyes;
        I cannot quantify the spacing between its eyes compared to the height between those and the tip of the nose as seen by a front-facing isometric projection, even if it’s all a fiction and I could just make things up.

        Basically my mind is running Unreal Engine 5 with medium settings, low LOD and AI generated textures - which would also explains a lot of other things now that I think about it.

    • LogicalDrivel@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Pretty lifelike. Full color/sensory immersion, even to the point of feeling things like cold, heat, wind, hearing loud noises, smells etc. Sometimes, if ive been really sleep deprived, it can take me a solid few minutes to realize Im even awake and in the “real world”.

    • somethingsnappy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      They can be amazing or terrible. Fly, go through days in dreams, sex, get chased by a monster. Lucid dreams. I also have sleep paralysis, so it can get pretty fucked up. It’s like having another life. Best part is I should be too old to have nocturnal emissions. Worst part is you can be so scared you wake yourself up (and your partner) by screaming. Or, in a few instances, choking or hitting your partner in your sleep.

      • Captain Aggravated@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        But you see things vividly in your dreams?

        Like, I’m a 1 on this scale. I remember and imagine very visually. I can picture an apple sitting on a plate on a table and it looks real. In fact, my mind imagined it being slid onto the table, and the apple rocked on the plate as it slid to a stop. My imagination has a physics engine.

        I also dream vividly, the experience feels very lifelike. The few lucid dreams I had tended to fade quickly when I realized I was dreaming. I’d love to be able to cause, and then maintain, that state.

  • Dharma Curious (he/him)@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    8 hours ago

    Most days I’m about a 3, sometimes it’s more like 4. If I’m reading a book or doing something like that, where I’m really focusing on the visualization, I can get to 2. The only time I ever get to 1 is when I’m laying in bed at night about to fall asleep.

    I have real trouble sleeping sometimes, and one of the things I do to help is put on instrumental music (lately, a lot of jazz sax), and then pick some random scenario, like:

    “if I could be king of the world what policy changes would I make?”

    Or “if I ever get to have kids, what kind of things would I most want to teach them?”

    Or “Let’s design the perfect floorplan for my dream home”

    And as I begin to drift off, but while still consciously aware, I can see things in stunning detail, but it’s always like they’re semi transparent. That’s not a great example, because there’s no backdrop, but it’s the best I’ve got.