• hark@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    14 hours ago

    If only there were a way to combine the two, then we could keep an even larger bubble going.

  • etherphon@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    39
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Can we switch back to the need based economy instead of the greed based economy?

      • etherphon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sure, but it will have to change eventually, we can’t keep pumping out more and more throwaway shit year after year, there will be a critical mass, or maybe we just die buried in our own garbage.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          It seems the nature of things are changing from physical things to digital things, and that has infinite potential. I expect at some point we’ll start mining the landfills because it’s easier than extracting stuff from the rock. Once that happens, there’s no physical limit on the greed.

          • Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            Well, what’s already happening is circular self-contained greed “economies” were money (not actual wealth just value-tokens such as money but also assets which have valuations expressed in said value-tokens, from crypto coins to realestate and stocks) is made from merely money being passed around whilst no actual value is created (in fact, value is mainly destroyed as those things are consuming actual resources to produce no real value at all, only boost the count of value-tokens)

            This is destroying the capability of currently accepted value-tokens to actual represent an underlying utility value.

            In other words, thing like stocks but also things like currency are decoupling from the underlying value they used to represent:

            • Stocks were a share of ownership in a structure - the company - that created things, either directly - manufacturing, extraction - or indirectly by increasing the efficiency of direct value creation - i.e. services that indirectly made manufacturing or extraction more efficient or helped in distributing the products of those - whilst nowadays the most “valuable” by market capitalization of stocks have almost purely speculative valuations or are for companies in rent-seeking activities which don’t create value but merely take a share of the value created by others.
            • Currency used to be (and still is to a large extent) value tokens which were a claim on the value produced by the Economy. What we’re seeing is that as more of those value tokens are created in those circular “economies” each token can claim less and less quyantities of the traditional underlying value things - just notice food inflation. Also rent-seeking activities (such as realestate investment) have even faster devalued how much each value-token can claim. Whilst official Inflation numbers don’t tell us this story (there is a strong motivation for politicians to have Officially recognized Inflation be lower than reality, because Mathematically that makes GDP seem larger), most people are actually feeling the real Inflation, especially in the most ancient and required concrete assets: Food and Housing.

            I expect that something is going to break, though I don’t know when and exactly how it’s going to materialized (though the way the ultra-wealthy are trying to transform the powers they captured from Democratic to Autocratic, leads me to believe that they’re preparing for a break in the functioning of the current value-tokens by having a more direct control over just about everything than indirectly by merelly holding lots of value-tokens).

            The societal consequences of the value-representation structures we have (literally, of thing like money, stocks and even certificates of ownership) unwinding would be huge.

          • etherphon@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Inifnite potential? Like NFTs? Subscriptions? I suppose… I’m beyond not interested in buying digital things I don’t even have the rights to, but I seem to be in the minority.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              16 hours ago

              Whether you have the rights is kind of irrelevant to this discussion. Let’s say it’s GOG games that are all DRM-free, my point is digital consumption has nearly infinite upper limits for consumption.

  • leftzero@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Wasting electricity that was already being wasted isn’t as bad as wasting electricity that was being used for something productive, I guess.

    • djsp@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Surplus electricity would lower bills for both households, which have been particularly affected by rising prices, and different industries which have also had to contend with AI for capital.

  • kubofhromoslav@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    19 hours ago

    Crypto mining is (mostly?) total waste… Proof of Work by doing hard but useless calculations and using it as kind of currency is like travelers on a desert world use water as a currency - but by intentionally spilling it 🤦🏻‍♂️

    Great cryptocurrencies does not need power hungry hardware. Eg. Nano (XNO) have a secure network error or using around 17 000 000 times less energy per transaction.

  • Zier@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    114
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Abandon the bitcoin scam, full steam ahead for the AI scam!!!

    • OwlPaste@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      How would they make money from ai? be like chatgpt and release their own ai plans or something? or something else?

      • ZoteTheMighty@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        28
        ·
        1 day ago

        Make no mistake; the people selling server time will be making money. They are selling a real product to a real customer, it’s just the customer is a tech company that will never make money back in turn.

        • mPony@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 hours ago

          if the tech company is lucky, they can sell whatever their product is to customers. Only issue is, there’s not enough customers eager enough to part with their money. A pyramid scheme fails if it can’t hang losses on consumers.

      • BlueKey@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        36
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Maybe host open source models and offer paid access for customers who need big generating capacities.

        • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          Paid : give money for

          Payed: nautical term meaning to let out some slack on the rope or to cover the deck in tar/pitch for sealing it

          • boatswain@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            22
            ·
            1 day ago

            As long as we’re being pedantic, when you pay out pitch, you’re not covering the deck with it. You’re making lines of it that go in between the deck planks. It’s basically caulking. You actually have to be careful to not get it everywhere (not least because pitch is really hot when you’re paying it out), so just like when you’re paying out a line, there’s a sense of careful control and easing out the pitch.

            • Afaithfulnihilist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Also, If I understand it correctly it’s also called this because caulking requires jamming pitch soaked rope into the joints so it’s still about rope!

              • boatswain@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Pretty close! It’s tar-soaked hemp fibers (rope traditionally being hemp), called oakum. Sometimes cotton under that for filling if needed. To me it still feels more about carefully easing out, particularly since paying out also has other uses that aren’t rope related, like falling off to leeward after a tack.

        • HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          Aren’t most miners running ASICs that are pretty much only useful for mining specific coins? I was hoping we were past the last “people are buying off-the-shelves GPUs for crypto” bubble.

          • jimerson@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            10
            ·
            1 day ago

            Depending on which crypto, but yes. And the ASICs have a usable shelf life of just a few years, so I assume they are migrating to machines for AI processing as their ASICs need routine replacement.

      • Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        In theory you could lease your server capacity to the big AI players, but then they would have to trust you -a noted crypto grifter - with their data.

      • jj4211@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 day ago

        Same way a lot of the “ai” companies make money, investors that have no idea but want to get in on the ground floor of the next nVidia or openai.

        • Zos_Kia@lemmynsfw.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          No they play a different game and leverage hardware. Most probably they’ll buy H100s instead of ASIC and run AI inference on that. It turns out that inference can be pretty profitable if you have good utilization and don’t need to train your own models.

    • real_squids@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hey now, at least bitcoin has it’s uses. And if you have a farm for it I doubt you’re scamming on the side, that’s risky.

        • Psythik@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          11 hours ago

          Bitcoin saved me from losing everything. You’d have to be a god damn fool to claim that it doesn’t have its uses. Investing when bitcoin was worth $19K was the smartest decision I ever made. You’ll never convince me that it’s a scam.

  • termaxima@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Bitcoin has at best 5 years left until quantum computers just destroy the cryptography they use, so they are right to look for an escape.

    I just wish they realized how futile this all is.

    • Tja@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      Quantum computers don’t destroy the cryptography, as long as you follow best practices and don’t reuse addresses.

  • leastaction@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Hey, now that we have this obscene energy-wasting capability, let’s see what other ways there are to generate equally obscene profits!