• 0 Posts
  • 1.14K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 16th, 2023

help-circle


  • When it’s totaled, then you get a cash payoff for what they declare it to be worth. It being the other person’s insurance does give you a bit more leverage than is it were your own.

    At least in my case, I was able to negotiate a bit and got the other person’s insurance to at least go up to paying the blue book retail for mint condition of the car. They also tossed in a few thousand for pain and suffering and covered a full month of rental car. In my case someone in the other car was unresponsive and needed an ambulance ride, and on my part I had been very thorough in documenting everything that legally would count including damaged contents in the trunk, missed work, and other things.

    However ultimately it is a check and car sales can be rough. So it may be that they were underpaid, or that the car’s general book value didn’t match their subjective value for the car, or they were thinking they should get what they paid for it. I could imagine if they bought a 2015 in 2019, they were probably getting a decent, off lease practically new car. Now they have a check appropriate for buying a 2015 of the same make and model and the 2015s now available are in worse shape than they kept their own, previous owners that neglected their car over a longer period.


  • I still think it could be a strategy for midterms.

    Best way to win midterms is to have the economy improve, for prices to go down.

    Best way to improve the economy is to first break it in obvious ways you know roughly how to undo.

    Come January, I expect TACO to go into full effect, announcing a hiatus on tariffs and in the subsequent months they’ll actually be able to show prices going down year to year. A comparative flood of cheap and available goods. They’ll claim the upswing as proof that 2025 was just the residual ‘Biden economy’.

    And it’ll work. People relieved at the good fortune will happily vote for the people that exacerbated the mess in the first place. Anyone pointing this out will be branded as a sore loser democrat that refuses to recognize Trump’s economic leadership.

    Unless they decide not to ‘waste it’ on midterms and save up for 2028 instead. But I’d guess midterms to keep GOP power strong while they have more time to implement whatever other measures might make it matter less about having to actually win over voters.



  • Those metrics aren’t any more trustworthy than their own subjective word anyway. If they wanted to say they took more time then they could delay at their whim anyway. If they said their production costs increased, then again, they could spend the money to fit the narrative. On those particular points objective evidence is so susceptible to being gamed that it isn’t really more valuable than their subjective reporting.

    Numbers of subscribers/views could be a bit more informative, but then people inclined to disbelieve would claim it’s because of any number of other reasons not because of AI slop.


  • Killing in this case sounds like the content is becoming harder and harder to create, which they lay out the subjective case for, but that wouldn’t be exactly something they could use figures to present, since it’s so subjective.

    The one point they might have been able to show with numbers would be the emergence of AI slop ‘infotainment animations’ diluting the audience, but that wasn’t exactly the biggest point of the video and it might be a bit early to be able to demonstrate statistically credible evidence on that one.



  • It’s so fun when it’s so specific about some detail with casual confidence that is based on absolutely nothing at all. I know ultimately it’s architecture is more akin to a predictive word generator, but it seems so much better.

    Saw a clear demonstration and it is wild that the output is consistent, but at least in the model I saw being run, every word is generated without it having considered what the word after would be or what the general concept it is going for. For a human one has to already know the concept before he/she starts putting words to it, but at least the models I’ve seen explained with detail, it manages to assemble it word by word without knowing where it is trying to go in advance.




  • Generally I see a few:

    • People wanting the highly deterministic, but slower behavior of the rc scripts.
    • People liking the fact that the rc startup was generally almost entirely defined in plain script files
    • Some folks criticizing certain opinionated things in systemd, as systemd delves deeper into things like capabilities and users.
    • Systemd can sometimes be a bit weird about how it does/does not capture stdout/stderr as one might guess in some situations.
    • Some folks not liking the journald angle of binary-only files

    Mainly the last point is the only one I personally find potentially aggravating, but since I never really am in a broken system without journalctl I’m not too bothered by it. I have saved myself some effort thanks to systemd including stuff that the daemons used to provide for themselves.


  • jj4211@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldI Quit
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    AI because its dumber than them and useless.

    I am much better at washing dishes by hand than my dishwasher. I still mostly let my dishwasher have a crack at things to spare me from usually having to bother.

    It’s a bit trickier with AI, as it’s more obnoxiously screwing up when it screws up, but at least upon occasion it’s able to spit out a few mind numbingly obvious lines of code that would have taken me longer to type myself, because I can only hit keyboard buttons so fast.



  • jj4211@lemmy.worldtoLemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldSimpler times?
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 days ago

    I didn’t suggest that people who are abused tend to go down this path, I’m saying of those that abuse others, they themselves were likely abused.

    I don’t know the percentage, but hypothetically if 2% of people abused go on to abuse others, this would be true without even saying anything about 98% of abused people.