I’m a professional developer, and currently by volume I’m confident latest models, Claude 4.5 Opus, GPT 5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, are able to write better, cleaner code than me.
I have also used the latest models and found that I’ve had to make extensive changes to clean up the mess it produces, even when it functions correctly it’s often inefficient, poorly laid out, and is inconsistent and sloppy in style. Am I just bad at prompting it or is your code just that terrible?
Apps then need to constantly reflow their layouts, resize content, adjust snapping behavior, and handle edge cases across different screen sizes, DPI settings, and multi-monitor setups. Also, this reflow logic has to work perfectly for legacy Win32 apps, modern UWP apps, and everything in between.
You mean the apps that were already handling this for decades when windows wasn’t a vibe-coded and ad-infested vehicle for AI slop?
Lots of the time when people bash a fruit it’s because they haven’t had a good one. I will say that most honeydews I’ve had were plain, but a good honeydew tastes great!
I believe whoever came up with that requirement could already be replaced by AI.
It’s all to make you feel desperate and worthless. It’s also the real reason behind the screaming about the birth rate, because they need a large supply of labor to pretend that they could always find someone else to do hard work for long hours and low pay.
Sometimes I wonder if it’s me getting old or if it’s tech being more and more about solutions in search of a problem. I feel like we had reached a “good enough” point for a while, but I can’t tell if the “good enough” judgement is just me getting old and stubborn.
I’m at carolina reaper. What now?
Introduced in 2023? A lot more recent than I would’ve thought.
I’ve pushed myself and all it unlocks is burning.
I read the article just fine, actually. If you actually understand what poverty means, you wouldn’t make such a ridiculous claim. It’d have to be a really high cost-of-living city for that to be the case, but there are a lot of cities where a family can raise children on $140k easily. Affordability these days is difficult in general, I understand the frustration, and it’s probably why people downvoted me by reflex, but creating a poverty line off cherry-picked conditions doesn’t make any sense.
No.
Except those who control the narrative will not face consequences for harmful messages they spread. For example, the trump administration spreads a lot of anti-trans messaging. They’ve been going after the funding of schools for what they deem “CRT and radical gender ideology” (https://thehill.com/homenews/education/5113202-trump-schools-executive-order-crt-gender-ideology/). Now imagine they go after online commentators which will be super easy because they’ve got their real names attached to their posts.
Just another once in a lifetime event.
Not hard to imagine, people already have to manicure their facebook and other social media accounts because employers look at them. Just because you don’t want something attached to your name, doesn’t mean it’s stupid or bad. There are consequences for unapproved behavior and opinions, even if they’re not wrong or harmful.
If you think anonymity is stupid, feel free to set your display name to your real name right here on lemmy.
Reminds me of the word “fan” which sounds mild when someone describes themselves as a fan of something, but it’s short for fanatic!
That doesn’t make any sense. You wouldn’t have access to their ID. Even if you did, you’re saying you can tell someone is an idiot by what? How they look? Their country of residence? Their age?
CinnamonRingCumGlaze86 will be significantly less able to use their 6th grade reading level to convince people that modern medicine is bad because Pre-Historical Witches didn’t have AIDS bro.
You don’t need accounts tied to ID to ban such content.
I’ve got this crazy idea where we can use GPUs to render 3D scenes efficiently.
A broken system will eventually work when the broken pieces have been replaced.
That’s what a paper bag is for.