• LemmyLegume@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    47 minutes ago

    We used to spend a good amount of money at Target and now we won’t go anywhere near it. It was great for gift shopping and seasonal stuff but we’ve figured out better options with retailers that don’t have gross values.

  • Plurrbear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    As a MN native… fuck Target! I tried until they laid off a bunch of people I know who didn’t wanna work in the DEAD downtown MPLS scene when given the new “rule” … savage!

    • ditty@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Same here. It sucks since Target was/is better than Wal Mart and the Daytons legacy still had them doing a lot of philanthropic donations. But yeah I haven’t shopped at Target in probably 4-5 months now.

  • WhatSay@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 hours ago

    I helped with their foot traffic! But I didn’t buy anything, because fuck target.

  • Ledericas@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    10 hours ago

    thier prices have always been more expensive and close to walgreens prices, they pride themselves as the bougie walmart version. they have also gotten rid of thier own in-brand items, in favor of cheapflationed items.

    • unsettlinglymoist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 hours ago

      I’ve never understood the appeal of Target. There’s a huge Target 60 seconds down the street from me and I never shop there except to get one or two items. It’s expensive, has a ridiculously small grocery section while clothing takes up half the store, and they’re so worried about shoplifters that they have multiple security staff standing at the door giving everyone leaving the stink eye.

      • Rekorse@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        44 minutes ago

        It’d a status thing. If you feel shame or whatever buying cheap kids clothes from walmart, cause other parents will judge you or something, then you would feel better shopping at target. Its a way of saying “we aren’t poor”. I think people that dont associate their identity with items like that dont see the appeal of target.

        I’m like you, its too expensive and they have a poor selection of groceries.

      • trashboat@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 hour ago

        I know people who like Target partly because of their selection of skincare products, and a lot of their clothes are stylish and relatively durable for what you pay for them. Both of those qualities can be found in plenty of other stores, though. Never bothered shopping for groceries there because the prices are truly ridiculous for a supermarket

  • Take_your_zync@eviltoast.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    28
    ·
    11 hours ago

    I specifically bought tomboyx boxer briefs for women at target to support their lgbt inclusivity before they dropped dei. Now I won’t buy anything from them at all. I know target wasn’t perfect but I wanted there to be more options available for people that need them and target was offering that with dei. Now, fuck em. They don’t support the people that make their business possible.

    • tempest@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      To be fair to target most business is just talk when it comes to these types of things.

      Consumers need to understand that corporate support for any particular initiative begins and ends with how it affects the bottom line.

      Disney, Google, even Costco cannot actually care about any of these things. The corporate incentives do not allow for it.

  • Katana314@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    12 hours ago

    I called to specifically inform them that I was a decently regular shopper, as someone who avoids many “mega-corps”, and that in the wake of their anti-DEI move, I would never buy anything from them ever again.

    Granted, I live in a city with many shops of various local varieties, and have other options. I’m aware the same chances aren’t available to everyone else.

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Did you call their corporate offices? Because if you just called your local branch, I can assure you that the person you spoke to could not give less of a shit lol

  • Basic Glitch@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    13 hours ago

    Maybe elected officials that keep defending this moron out of some kind of false sense of protection can take hint?

  • Tygr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    12 hours ago

    Don’t choose politics when marketing your store. They eliminated some shoppers with the DEI stuff then they eliminated even more but removing DEI.

  • Billiam@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    116
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Just goes to show how bending the knee to the bigot brigade doesn’t work. Are more of the fat orange traitorous fuck’s cult shopping there?

    No.

    Target did exactly what they wanted- first by hiding their Pride merch last June, and then by eliminating their diversity programs- and the only result is the people who didn’t shop at Target still aren’t, but the people who did shop there are taking their business elsewhere.

    Soon Target’s going to have to either try to reverse course to save face with their former clientele, or they’re gonna have to double down in an effort to attract more MAGAts to their rotting corporate corpse. And as InBev learned with Dylan Mulvaney, that’s not a decision you want to fuck up.

    • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      11 hours ago

      InBev stock is up 1.6% over the last year. If you’d bought stocks this January, you would have made about 30% profit.

      • Billiam@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        InBev is doing fine, because they own over 600 brands globally.

        Bud Light sales however are not doing fine. Its sales are down about 40% compared to pre-2023 levels, and has dropped from most-popular to third most popular beer. They pissed off the no-taste mouthbreathing MAGAts who were their primary customers by mailing Dylan one fucking can, and then pissed off everyone else when they threw Dylan under the bus immediately because the MAGAts started all bleating about it.

        Target is now literally in that same position.

        • GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          2 hours ago

          So the boycott was pointless, as indicated. I also saw people saying they were going to boycott InBev, and they clearly had an impact for some period of time, along with the Bud Light boycotters, yet here we are. Also, you mentioned InBev, not Bud Light.

          • Billiam@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            1 hour ago

            My dude, it sounds like you’re being needlessly accusative.

            I never said InBev was in trouble; I said they fucked up their response to the Dylan Mulvaney backlash. Which they absolutely did, and it caused their most popular American beer brand to lose sales.

            A lot of people at the time were (correctly) pointing out that most of the beers the MAGAts decided to switch to in their performative protests were also owned by InBev.

  • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    16 hours ago

    I’ve not stepped inside a Walmart in over 10 years, I had shopped almost exclusively at Target, but that stopped after they bent the knee.

    I still haven’t gone inside Walmart, but, they have curbside pickup. Do all my shopping through the app and they bring it out to my car. I don’t like that I’m supporting Walmart, but fuck, I’ve gotta get my shit from somewhere and it’s either Amazon, Walmart, Kroger or Target.

    • HellsBelle@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I’ve gotta get my shit from somewhere and it’s either Amazon, Walmart, Kroger or Target.

      Honestly the fault for this shit storm lies with the government for allowing big box stores and grocery conglomerates to buy up smaller operators and dominate the market. And the origins of that lies with the Reagan/Thatcher trickle down bullshit.

      If America could/would have seen through the lies and obfuscation in 1980 I believe everything would be radically different than it is now.

    • ramble81@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      75
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I’d still say Walmart is objectively worse. Target may have dropped DEI, but Walmart has too and they have multiple known practices to push out small companies, predatory practices and tricks to force their workers to live near poverty levels by denying them insurance and decent pay.

      • WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        14 hours ago

        A dramatic downturn of profits at Target immediately after they dropped their DEI policies sends a message. A downturn in Wal-Mart’s profits as they conduct business as usual does not.

      • Bob Robertson IX @discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Oh, I know… but they’ve always been shit and never pretended otherwise. Boycotting Target is to send a message to hopefully get then to stop being as shitty.

        Honestly, it all really just seems pointless.

        • ramble81@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          13 hours ago

          I’m not suggesting to shop at Target, just don’t spend your money at Walmart instead. Try to find local or other stores that have things. For example, in South Texas there are HEB Plus stores that have pretty much everything Target and Walmart have.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      16 hours ago

      You could try smaller, local businesses if Walmart and Target have not pushed them out in your area.

    • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Walmart thanks you for ignoring the many 10,000 times worse horrifying business practices they perfected. Good for you though, the cause du jour stands.

    • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Thanks for doing what you can. Unfortunately we live in a world of compromise, too many of us on the left let perfect ideals defeat good practices.

      • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 hours ago

        It’s not “not perfect” to pick Walmart over target. It’s like picking Hitler over some dude who killed two people.

        • Frozengyro@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Did you read a word I wrote? Many don’t have a good choice. Often doing the best you can, is all you can do.

          • TrickDacy@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            13 hours ago

            They said they were choosing Walmart over target. So maybe you yourself did not read?

  • BowlingForBowls@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    78
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Every company/university that’s dropped DEI has done so under political terrorism. NOT ONE has said it cost them money, was ineffective, inefficient, a waste of resources, “didn’t align with their values” or any other scapegoat reasoning.

    I’m not letting them off the hook, though. They were still cowards for giving in to the political pressure, and I’m glad they’re having regrets.

    • BassTurd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      I disagree that they’ve all done it under political duress. I think many of these companies have used the political environment to be shitty, and drop something they didn’t want to support.

      I think it’s just like Republicans over the past 12+ years. Once Trump came along and normalized hate speech, it’s empowered other wastes-of-oxygen to do the same. They’ve always been racists and bigots, but now it’s acceptable to do it publicly. I try to do my part by calling it out when I can. Silence is complacency, so I’m all in on name and shame in the moment.

      • nfh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        15 hours ago

        It’s not that there wasn’t any political pressure. It’s that the slightest bit of pressure caused them to pull the plug swiftly.

        I think the companies who were led by people personally antagonistic to DEI already weren’t doing it. They started it when the political winds were in favor of DEI, found that it did something beneficial for them that was worth the investment (ultimately, increasing profits, probably through PR) and reaped what they could. But the slightest headwinds caused them to drop it, for lack of confidence it would be worth the continued investment. For others, it was beneficial enough this pressure didn’t change their decisions.

        None of this is likely coming from company leaders caring about DEI for some sort of principled reason, just companies who care about only one thing, reassessing the value of DEI in terms of that one thing, $ return on spend. This is a group who needs subtler treatment than the anti-DEI crowd, this is fair weather friends who don’t care. What little we can do is reward those who don’t give in to the slightest push.

        • BassTurd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          14 hours ago

          Honestly, I’m so damn pessimistic anymore that I default to the preparator being intentionally malicious. I’ve been burned too many times. You’re definitely right though, I just hate that it’s a thing. It’s nauseating.