Fight, sure, but it wouldn’t be like other recent wars.

If only we had some checks and balances in place

And Congress can just retroactively make it legal

Bob, WeHadAnAwakening You’reAGirl!

Saying it out loud you’d have to reduce it, right? But my real problem with the message is how do you know when to sell the bitcoin?

I started by picking a lot of indexers, trying to cover my bases, but every search would take forever because it sifts through every match to find the best one for your criteria. In the end I pared it down to just to just a couple big ones that even I’ve heard of and it’s been fine 98% of the time.

I’ve always heard the private indexers are best, but I don’t have experience with them.

I assume it’s UK/EU’s expanding social media laws that are driving this, in addition to Discord’s imminent Initial Public Offering coming in March. They’re trying to clean house to show how profitable they can be, the same way Reddit created their walled garden by restricting third-party connections prior to their IPO.

It’s bog-standard enshittification to please the shareholders.

The sharpening for these is particularly easy because you only really have to follow the angles that are already there. Even as a complete amateur I was able to bring new life to an old pair of Gingher scissors

Are they still good? How long do VHS tapes last?

How long until Trump takes credit?

My first thought was a gun, that’s pretty American, and if you show them how American you are they are less likely to want to try to arrest you

Medical History Barbie with Character References, we can do differential analysis

I’m with you, I love arcades but I just wish I didn’t have to buy SpaceBucks (tokens, credits, chips) in order to play. Oh, Capitalism, is there nothing you can’t enshittify?

“Doorhacker, I’m afraid there’s another one. Can you help us once again, old friend?”

Sounds like they split the signal after the cable box. The original Duplicate Screen.

Thanks for picking up on the sarcasm, I was worried it might not be apparent enough, but it’s hard to judge with this medium.

The point I was making with the reply, of course, was that the narrative of ICE only going after hardened criminals is ludicrous on the surface of it, and even if one were to somehow believe that, the numbers simply don’t bear it out.

Ah, I see the worst of the worst rape-murdering narco-immigrants who are here only for violence have finally decided to almost shoot their most feared and hated enemy.

I think plasma should just be one of the commonly accepted Christmas decorations, you know? Quit fucking around with those other, lamer states of matter and just give the people what they want.

In my mind the rules are clear on that: to use deadly force there must be an imminent threat of death or serious bodily harm. Potential future harms can’t even begin to be accounted for, so the standard has to be judged with those immediate circumstances in mind.

Even in that situation there are means to deter a threat or determine a person’s intent prior to employing any sort of lethal force. There’s nothing justifiable about this.

Was it the head of the USDA withholding funds? I was under the impression that the administration said there were no funds, and then there was no way to release the funds, and then that it would be too complex to do so with any expediency.

Why are they appealing the ruling, do you think?