Judge faces lawsuit after forcing student to put on jail garments and handcuffs and enter isolated holding cell

A Detroit judge who briefly detained a teenage girl who fell asleep in his courtroom during a school field trip to learn about the justice system was demoted to presiding over traffic court as he faces a federal lawsuit.

Judge Kenneth King was moved to the state court’s traffic division after the incident on 13 August. King was temporarily removed from the bench as he completed mandatory training following his actions.

“We appreciate his efforts in preparing for this role, and wish him success as he transitions into this new responsibility,” said the chief judge, William McConico, in a statement.

  • Empricorn@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I was so, so waiting for consequences to finally reach this asshole. Reminder that this was an unhoused teenage student who was apparently exhausted trying to meet all her responsibilities. She needed an advocate, not a bully. This is the type of person that demands respect from you, while not valuing you as a human, beyond considering what you can do for him. I hope he endures excruciating traffic cases until he is removed from the bench…

  • ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Dude had a fucking power boner.

    He saw a tired teenager who was bothering nobody as an opportunity to wave his dick around.

  • Etterra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 hours ago

    If I was the family of this girl I’d want to sure this dude so hard he’d end up living in a box under a bridge. Then go find him and take away his box.

    • VelvetStorm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Ya, I agree that they should 100% get some sort of monetary compensation for this. The issue is that the judge has a lot of money and can get a much better lawyer than them. They are already close to being homeless so I don’t imagine they can afford a good lawyer, there may be 1 or 2 who would take the case Pro Bono but I’m betting most would offer to do it for 40% of the winnings.

      • piecat@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        5 hours ago

        40% of the winnings is a bargain. The difference in good lawyers is both the time spend on your case, and how much they win.

        That 60% wouldn’t be gotten without the lawyer.

  • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    115
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    The bigger picture here is that he had an active YouTube livestream with roughly a 1000 fans that he used to interact with while in cases over the last few years. He even repositioned the cameras for them while he was harrasing that poor girl.

    Its clear that his treatment of her was not only an ego trip, but one done for views.

    • catloaf@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      16 hours ago

      What in the fuck? I’m surprised they even let cameras in the courtroom, let alone let the judge be a streamer!

      • stoly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        They are public places with public proceedings. For the most part, you can just go in and sit down and watch a case, assuming there is space.

        • humorlessrepost@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          9 hours ago

          My local court house makes all non-lawyers leave their phones in their cars. You can watch all you want, but only with your eyes. They won’t let you through the metal detector with a phone.

          • Crikeste@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 hours ago

            Well there’s a difference between them streaming things to the public for the sake of transparency, and you taking private videos for god knows what.

      • Bassman1805@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        34
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I can see a certain angle where it makes sense: youth/general outreach, educating people about the court system. Something a little more interactive/entertaining than CSPAN, but more real than Judge Judy.

        But you throw “influencer culture” into the mix and you’ve got a disastrous recipe for The Chat influencing the outcome of cases.

        • Zahille7@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          The only way I could see it potentially working is if there’s like a team who handles the whole thing.

          Maybe there’s one or two cameras, one facing the courtroom and the other facing the judge. The judge doesn’t see any screens of any kind, and doesn’t have access to a keyboard or anything to interact with a chat, if there even is one; ideally there would be no chat and it would just be a stream you watch. If there is a chat, someone else should be handling it and possibly not even in the same room.

          • mosiacmango@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 hours ago

            My link goes into it, but thats what the court oversight commission in the state wants. An inhouse system where streams and their features are centrally controlled. They have not been able to get funding to stand that up, but they have been advocating for it.

            Their current recommendation is that YouTube comments be disabled, but they don’t have the legal mandate to enforce that apparently. This judge’s shitty behaviour may help them make that case at least.

    • Avatar_of_Self@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      13 hours ago

      He’s an elected judge. I don’t know Michigan’s laws but there might not be much more that can be done by the court administration themselves. I personally also took Chief Judge McConico’s statement as a tactful ‘fuck you’ to Judge King.

  • macarthur_park@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    64
    ·
    16 hours ago

    King is facing a federal lawsuit filed by Eva Goodman, 15, and her mother, Latoreya Till, after Goodman was forced to put on jail garments, handcuffed and put in an isolated holding cell during an educational trip to King’s courtroom.

    The trip certainly was educational, though probably not in the way the school intended.

    • bean@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Ironically the judge got himself an educatin’ too didn’t he. Fuck around power tripping and find out.

    • pdxfed@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      But perhaps exactly what was (unfortunately) needed;

      Don’t assume institutions and those in power or authority are anything more than fallible efforts. Ever.