• Jaysyn@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    46 minutes ago

    They are still pushing this? We already know it’s not true. At least one person that skipped the vote was actually there according to witnesses (and I think video). The rest were at a fucking AIPAC event. We still have more work to do in 2028 to get rid of the rest of these Israeli shills.

  • D_C@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You know what I do when I’m expected at an important anything? Such as a meeting, or going to the airport. A funeral, maybe.
    I LEAVE FUCKING EARLY.

    Now if I was just going to the pub etc then it doesn’t really matter if I’m a little bit late. So, FUCK YOU, traitors.

  • pipi1234@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    If I am absent for a meeting at work I get at least asked why, and would suffer consequences if the reasons are not valid.

    I am by no means an essential worker or a lawmaker…

    How the fuck do politicians dont get fired by these kind of things?

  • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 hours ago

    sure the traffic, when the ones missing are all aipac donees. no ones falling for the republican deflection method right now by the dems.

    • Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Try again in 2027 when the new congress take effect and the Democrats actually have a majority and not dependent on Republican dissidents, and presumably a Democratic speaker that isn’t interested in blocking the vote.

      • TN2VOA@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        They still need Republican votes to convict. Unless there’s “traffic” and a bunch of Republican senators happen to not be there that day.

        • Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          44 minutes ago

          True, still a pretty slim chance, but at least a few less Republicans that would have to support the conviction.

    • kreskin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Hot stone massage at aipac hq. All week. israel doesnt want the Iran war questioned or challenged in any way, and the dems are willing to tie us all to the ‘trolley problem’ tracks to keep Israels wars going. “Whatever Israel needs”

    • FrostyTheDoo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      12 hours ago

      How nice of them to put themselves on the list of people for serious Americans to vote against next election so early in the cycle. I thought it would take a few months for them to make themselves this known.

    • protist@retrofed.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      48
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      On its face, this seems like a dirty trick by Republicans. Mike Johnson called a recess, then after members left, called a snap vote on whether to proceed with impeachment with no warning. This entire spectacle reeks of a planned Republican scheme to try to influence the outcome through procedure and sow division within the Democratic party. The Republican House caucus was obviously made aware this was happening so they would stick around.

      That any House Speaker can call a snap vote like this is a serious problem for our democracy.

      • njm1314@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        11 hours ago

        But you have to be smart enough to know that’s a possibility. That’s a trick that they’ve used before and has been used before for decades. A good leader, someone good at whipping votes, has to be aware of these tricks and has to be ready for them. A good leader would be able to keep his people ready for this kind of trick. There was only a small window they could have pulled it in.

        • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 hours ago

          And I’m sure if some random person on Lemmy could figure it out, the people who’ve actually worked in the job for years or decades would have figured it out too. This is just whitewashing the Democrats culpability in aiding the Republican agenda yet again.

    • Cosmoooooooo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      So, the israelis threw a party way the fuck in nowhere right before a critical vote, and there just happened to be a huge traffic jam blocking their only path back to vote?

      So, throw a party then crash a truck to continue their war of genocide uninterrupted. It’s what their fictional gawd told them to do. Everything is justified by a fictional being that lives in their religious psychopathy.

  • 23lonestar@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    15 hours ago

    It wasn’t an impeachment vote. It was a vote to send it to committee which is what the Republicans wanted to delay. The vote was moved up and closed early by Johnson. In all honesty, any impeachment needs to be done in January because it will actually pass the Senate and Dems would control the approval of the nomination.

      • curbstickle@anarchist.nexus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        37
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Because Johnson. He was aware people were en route and closed the vote.

        Its also misleading, its “some of the 11”. Pelosi was in CA for a veterans day event, another was going in for a medical procedure, another had an unrelated (and unspecified) personal emergency, like 4 said they were stuck in traffic (motorcade blocking traffic), and I think it was 2 at the AIPAC event.

        Not excusing anything here BTW, just pointing out the title is kinda shitty.

      • KoboldCoterie@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        14 hours ago

        I mean, everyone not being in attendance can’t automatically delay votes, or anyone could unilaterally block a vote by just not showing up. However, I think we all know why the vote was moved up and closed early - it’s specifically because they were stuck in traffic.

        • Darkonion@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          13 hours ago

          They shouldn’t have needed to be at a specific location to vote for more than 100 years… How is it still allowed to be an excuse.

          • barnacles@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            11 hours ago

            Alternatively

            Having been required to be at a specific location to vote for more than 100 years is probably a good reason to be at the location

              • barnacles@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 hours ago

                Yeah agree, this has happened in my country too - I think they could have been more aware of the risk, especially at the moment.

    • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      11 hours ago

      I’m actually not sure it will pass the senate even after we get 54 DNC Senators in because I’m pretty sure it’s still 60 to remove even though it was 50 + VP to confirm? It’s a little confusing.

      • Sir. Haxalot@nord.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        It needs a 2/3 majority in the Senate to convict in the senate, so yes, it seems very unlikely to go through.

        • TN2VOA@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 hours ago

          2/3 of all senators present. So if there is traffic and a few Republicans miss the vote, that’s just too bad.

  • DominusOfMegadeus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    29
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    16 hours ago

    These people are miscreants of the worst kind for this. In addition, though, maybe we should update the rules so people don’t have to be in one fucking building all at the same time in order for our government to function. We have the technology, people. We can make it better, faster, and stronger than what it is now.

    • CmdrShepard49@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      10 hours ago

      That just introduces new problems like Mitch McConnell “working from home” and voting on every Republican bill despite having been dead for the prior 18 months.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      Actually, I’d like to keep it that way for now. These fuckers use Microsoft for their confidential emails. I don’t want to imagine the huge security issues they’d create in voting for budgets and legislation.

  • FiniteBanjo@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 hours ago

    What about this vote was “key”? It’s like one of many votes none of which will result in anything before the new congress takes office on January 3rd.

    • chaogomu@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Key in that, had they shown up, it would have passed. Some just skipped it completely, some were “stuck in traffic” but all of them were not doing their jobs.