“Ad blockers prevented your review submission.”
No, you prevented the review submission, by taking the time out of your day to write a dialogue box that prevents submissions.
Look at what they did!
I fucking despise this kind of gaslighting. YouTube does it too, with their “experiencing interruptions?” popup that then takes you right to the FAQ section telling you to disable your adblocker and that it may cause problems. no, you drooling fucking simpletons, you are causing problems deliberately, problems I will circumvent without disabling anything out of pure spite.
Turn it off just to leave an even lower review, mentioning this BS in the review.
"I was going to leave 3 stars. Product was meh. But I dropped it to 1 stars because I had to turn off my adblock just to leave this review.
Do not buy this product. They know it’s bad. That’s why they want less reviews from people who won’t turn off adblock."
Response from our management: “We’re sorry you’re having issues. Please accept this coupon for 10% off your next purchase!”
This is how I expect their bot to respond.
🎯
Leaving a review on the company website is pointless anyway.
I love the way companies simply refuse to not track us. You guys seen those cookie popups that are like “accept and continue” or “reject and pay” where you have to actually pay to reject cookies? I cannot believe that’s legal at all. Total scumbags.
It’s not.
I usually go into zapper mode on ublock to remove the pop up without agreeing, but they probably treat that as “accept and continue”.Much better: when this happens, I block frames and scripts from loading through ublock.
I personally have never seen a pay to reject. What types of websites have you come across that do that? I’m genuinely curious.
A lot of news sites! Let me see if I can find one.
I’m pretty sure I saw it on Autosport earlier today. Just opened it in Chrome (ew) – see screenshot!
Edit: reading the popup, I assume the legal loophole is that you technically CAN revoke consent after accepting, without paying, by visiting a whole separate page and doing it there. Ultra scummy!
Oh! Ok. I was under the impression the verbiage had the word Reject in it somewhere; that’s on me. It makes much more sense now, and I get what you’re saying. Thanks for the clarification!
I actually do think I’ve seen variations in this wording over the course of a few months. I’m going to go digging around sites I think are probably less scrupulous to see if I can find examples.
Boom, gotcha. First absolute rag that came to mind. Check it!
Edit: also it’s totally on me that you thought the word Reject was in there - I put it in quotes and then provided an example that didn’t contain it, sorry! 😂
They’re doing that because of the GDPR.
That’s sort of what I’m saying, though; I would have thought this would have been a violation of some of the guidelines around consent in the gdpr
Which now renders their site useless … I’ll go on your site to look up basic info … then go to your store to get what I want and even visit some other store or service that could give me the same product.
It’s a disincentive to want to use their site in the future.
I’ve stopped using several store websites because of this. Then when I want an actual product … I’ll call the store and ask them to look for the product for me. If they have it great, if they don’t, I’ll look for it elsewhere or figure out some other solution for myself that doesn’t involve any of their dumb websites.
I’m regressing from the internet and use people contact more and more because of this stupidity. I’m going back to the way I did things in the 90s and early 2000s where I would just use their store flyer as a guide, call the local store to ask for something and then go look for it myself because the online services today are so intrusive and needlessly complicated that its faster and more useful to not go online.
Is it possible that their review form functions on some kind of script language that is commonly filtered by ad blockers?
Browsing the site on mobile / without an Ad Blocker, I’m not seeing any ads. Might just need to reduce the filtering level.
No. A lot of websites deliberately disable functionality when they detect an ad-blocker to annoy you into disabling it.
I wonder how many people that actually works on…
They probably use a 3rd party for reviews, so the ad blocker accidentally blocks that service
Sounds like the 3rd party site isn’t trustworthy.
