• poinck@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Both can be very rude to people around them (from what is visible in public). I wouldn’t want either of them as my boss. Apart from that, both have their ways to entertain; I don’t mean by displaying bad behaviour to people; that is no entertainment I enjoy.

    • deltapi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Sure, but one is rude to people that deliver bad work to him, the other is rude to people that don’t accept his bad work from him.

    • Wilmo@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Is he even very tech savvy? Like IIRC he tried to install a Linux Desktop once. And on installing steam he went ahead with the terminal prompts that were warning him whatever weird command he did was going to nuke his desktop environment.

      • lepinkainen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        6 hours ago

        That case was a legitimate bug in the specific PopOS version he was using

        It was bad luck on every side. Mostly because pop doesn’t update packages during install

      • chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        9 hours ago

        I don’t watch his other content but in that one video he was absolutely doing exactly what a typical user would do in his situation. He was trying to follow a tutorial, he ran into the sort of warning message Windows users are conditioned to breeze past, and followed the onscreen instructions without trying to understand the confusing stuff. They changed how it worked after that incident, as they should if mass adoption is at all desirable.

        • ozymandias117@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          7 hours ago

          The GUI wouldn’t let him break it, so he tried the command line.

          The command line required him to type, with punctuation “Yes, do as I say!” after a big warning.

          If an average user will do that, the “fix” of needing to create a file before being able to type “Yes, do as I say!” isn’t going to change anything

          • yistdaj@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 hours ago

            I think there were a few other changes indirectly inspired by what had transpired, but admittedly I can’t remember most of them. I think Debian also modified apt.

            I also think I remember immutable distros taking off just after this.

        • skisnow@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          7 hours ago

          All I’m seeing there is he decided to deliberately did something wrong on behalf of an imaginary person and then complain that doing the deliberately wrong thing broke the computer.

          • BunScientist@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            7 hours ago

            tbf if your desktop environment gets uninstalled after “sudo apt install steam” it’s not entirely the user’s fault

            • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              6 hours ago

              Its not the users fault at all.

              That is insane behaviour, and part of why every desktop app should be a flatpak

            • mybuttnolie@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              6 hours ago

              wait what? which distro does that? I’ve installed steam probably 50+ times like that… (haven’t seen the video since youtube is impossible to watch with a VPN)

      • festnt@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        9 hours ago

        yeah, though he is used to windows warning with every program install that it might break the pc so ignoring a warning isn’t THAT unexpected

  • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    20
    ·
    10 hours ago

    The problem with this is that it gives legitimacy to an idiot YouTuber who has gone out of their way to discourage new Linux users.

    And nevermind all the other garbage from LTT

    • dev_null@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      35
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Uhh, he promotes Linux at every step? You are free to dislike him and his content, but he’s absolutely a force for Linux adoption.

      • CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        24 minutes ago

        Then he’s changed his tune. I haven’t watched him for years at this point when I realized how technologically inept they are. I’m thinking specifically of the storage server video.

      • bobo@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        From what I remember it went like this, but I stopped following his crap years ago

        • sees an error message, doesn’t read it
        • starts pasting random shit into the terminal
        • breaks the system
        • Fuck Linux, it’s not ready for use
        • after the Linux community has a meltdown, someone points out to him that he’s an idiot, but in a gentle way you’d tell your boss
        • tries again, gives up again
        • films another video on how windblows just works, while he, a certifiable tech genius, couldn’t get it to work

        Truly “a force for Linux adoption”.

        • SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 hour ago

          He is a time poor impatient person. That is something linux will need to address for wider adoption.

          I would argue that their example resulted in some very wide ranging changes in approach that was long overdue.

          Linux was at risk of becoming an “OS for us” instead of a true replacement for everyone.

          I suspect if they repeat the challange today, it would be a night and day difference.

      • JargonWagon@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        8 hours ago

        I very much so enjoyed their content where they attempted Linux only for 30 days straight. They documented their successes, struggles, and roadblocks. I think they did two different attempts, the first time they didn’t recommend it and the second time they did. I might be misremembering the first attempt.

  • fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    The difference is the things they drop.

    One drops well deserved rants and ass-chewings.

    The other drops expensive equipment.

  • wizardbeard@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    98
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Guess we’re all gonna ignore all the drama about LTT from last year?

    Saying he’s the one who breaks is an understatement.

    • starman2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      58
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      The one who steals prototype liquid coolers, fucks up installation, and slanders their manufacturers

      • MonkeMischief@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        48
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        12 hours ago

        Oh yeah, and disallowing employees from discussing their income, I think was another one.

        Lots of anti-union behavior.

        • Credibly_Human@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          14
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          Im very happy to see people aren’t downplaying what a shitty guy he is here.

          Like the way you treat your employees and the people you work with is shit that actually matters.

          I don’t give a shit if someone is clumsy for entertainment, I give a shit when their workspace is a good ol boys club, sweatshop, and then when they decide to threaten a defamation lawsuit against a former female employee they brought in under very suspect circumstances in the first place all because they couldn’t find evidence within their company they admit has an awful HR department.

          Just a fucking mess, and I hate that shitty people just succeed nowadays.

      • dev_null@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        10 hours ago

        That’s what most people took away from the drama. No one looked into it later to find out was made up because that’s no longer interesting. As is usually the case with Internet drama.

        (Emails eventually came out showing Billet Labs told them to keep the cooler, and then lied about it)

        • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          (Emails eventually came out showing Billet Labs told them to keep the cooler, and then lied about it)

          Which is why LTT made a monetized apology video saying it was an accident and they had intended to return it, right? A video in which they leaked a private phone number related to Billet Labs, might I add.

          The person you responded to provided a simplified explanation. You, on the other hand, have provided one that is false.

          Billet Labs initially stated that they could keep it, yes, but after the ridiculous, defamatory review performed on the entirely wrong hardware, they requested it back, which LMG agreed to provide prior to selling it at auction.

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            10
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 hours ago

            Yes, once Billet changed their mind after not liking the review, they mistakenly sold it and paid them back.

    • JustARegularNerd@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      ·
      edit-2
      14 hours ago

      As much as I don’t like LMG, I’d still suffer one of their videos if it had Torvalds in it just out of plain interest

      Edit: seems my comment is being misunderstood - I know their collab video is happening, I’m saying that’s why I’ll watch it when it comes out despite not being a huge LMG viewer anymore

      • Cris@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        53
        ·
        edit-2
        39 minutes ago

        There were kinda three separate things that rolled together, mind you, I’m not especially in the know about any of them, so hopefully others can expand

        1. the auctioned something that was supposed to be a small company’s prototype water block or something, it wasn’t theirs to sell
        2. they started making too many errors in their rush to do large scale testing and when people make decisions based on the incorrect info you’re putting out thats not great
        3. there was an employee who used to work at LTT after being a fan who they built a PC for (maddison, I think?). When the other two items above were brought up by gamer’s nexus and it turned into a whole situation where people were being critical of LTT, she shared that she had an absolutely horrible experience working there, crazy crunch time, I think there was sexual harassment or something, I don’t recall all the details. She explained she didn’t share it sooner because she expected people would just turn on her for criticizing LTT and it makes sense she would feel more able to share if people seem like they might be more receptive to criticism of a huge channel like that

        The first two that were brought up in an bombshell gamer’s nexus video were, imo, handled very poorly (EDIT: I should clarify, I meant the initial first reseponse), though again, I don’t remember details (about the very first response I think I remember not being great, or otherwise 😅)

        The last item I’m honestly not sure how it panned out but my impression is that nothing really happened with it. LTT was gonna transfer CEO to being a new guy with Linus being more of a face and direction guy, and the new CEO guy I think was the one who had an outside investigation of some kind conducted. I don’t think there was ever an update about that investigation? I dunno. I didn’t watch much before the whole situation and just kinda stopped watching when the initial criticism from gamer’s nexus was poorly handled

        • fonix232@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          32
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          IIRC for the third item, the ex-employee who threw those accusations around turned out to be exaggerating things - but there was a whole ass investigation and Linus did step down as CEO, handing the reins over to a new guy who was literally brought in to fix these things (although to be fair I had the feeling that Linus has been wanting to step back for a while and this gave him an out).

          Mind you I’m not saying that there weren’t problems (any company that scales as much as LMG did in the past few years will have issues), but that the issues presented to the public by the disgruntled employee were heavily exaggerated.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            30 minutes ago

            I think maybe we should stop short of saying we know for a fact what did or didn’t happen with her. An outside investigation does absolutely help, and hopefully if anything was wrong it has now been rectified.

            But there are lots of ways that companies can clear their names, and bringing in a company to do an investigation could either be done in good faith, or be a very effective way of cleaning up an enormous PR mess.

            I think we should be warry of making snap calls about who was factually in the right in these kinds of situations unless there’s hard evidence available to us. Often these situations are about our gut feeling of what happened, and our gut feeling isn’t objective. And getting it wrong in either direction has the potential to be enormously damaging (though in this case I believe there was no specific alleged perpetrator for the allegations like sexual harassment)

            I feel this is one of those situations where nuance and being okay with not knowing exactly what happened is important. Though perhaps you know more facts about the situation than I do, and have more concrete reason to believe it was highly exaggerated

          • dev_null@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            edit-2
            10 hours ago

            This is true, but the CEO change had nothing to do with it. It was already happening before any of the drama, due to Linus wanting to have more time for making videos instead of having to manage the company.

        • accideath@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          24
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          15 hours ago

          They did acknowledge #1 and #2 as mistakes, miscommunication and growing pains and vowed to do better. I think it was a bit overblown and handled in bad faith by GN‘s reporting. Not that that’s an excuse but imo they did their best to rectify that situation. The reporting has been more accurate and bo other scandal of this type has happened, so far. The investigation about the working conditions and sexual harassment concluded those allegations were „unfounded and unfair“, to use LMG’s words. They did not get into details and it is a he-said/she-said situation. It’s anyone’s guess what/whom to believe.
          I think, all in all, Linus stepping back from the CEO position (which, to be clear, he did a little while before those problems came to light) improved upon most, if not all of the problems, as far as I can tell. I do still watch LTT on occasion but less so. Primarily though, because both, my interests changed as did their content.

          • Cris@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            43 minutes ago

            Thats very fair, I vaguely recalled there was some initial handling of the issue that wasn’t great or something, and that was what I was talking about. I’m glad to hear the longer term response has been a lot better! (Assuming I’m even remembering correctly that the initial handling was crummy)

            Thank you for adding more info and context!

            • Jollyllama@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              He treated his “investigation” as if he was going after a big hardware company instead of a direct competitor in his space. It left a very bad taste in my mouth. Not to mention when LTT did implement changes and begin improving did he acknowledge after his insane takedown?

        • Eldritch@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          Most of those are 2 to 3 years ago now though. A lot of that was during and immediately post covid. I’m not up on anything major in the last year. Though they did just recently have a bunch of their regulars break away. It seems amicable however. And a result of the new CEO and CEO decisions rubbing against the grain of the previous very bro centered culture of the crew. Not as professional as they could have been etc.

          Heck all that happened before even Emily left. And she put out that video explaining her departure in January.

      • HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I don’t really watch LTT, but I think they we’re pretty bad when explaining why they didn’t make more fuzz about Honey stealing commissions when LTT found out.

        • dev_null@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 hours ago

          The explanation made sense to me. They found Honey was stealing from creators, but still saving money for users, so it would be very self-serving to make a fuss about it, instead they only let other creators know. From the users point of view it was still a great product (from what was known at the time).

      • Chloé 🥕@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        16 hours ago

        toxic working conditions and sexual harassment (this article also mentions them doing sloppy reviewing that led to misleading videos, which is bad but imo nowhere near as bad as the rest, i kinda wish the article didn’t focus so much on it)

        i also remember linus saying he’d refuse to let his workers unionize, saying it would “make him feel like a bad boss”

        and he’s also said that floatplane (their video streaming app) would let anyone join no matter their politics, up to and including nazis, because “free speech”

        • accideath@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          15 hours ago

          LMG claims that an investigation by a third party found the allegations of toxic work conditions and sexual misconduct as „unfounded and unfair“. It’s of course anyone’s guess what the reality looks like.
          They definitely have improved their reviews and seem much less error prone these days.

          That union thing is bullshit tho. Linus never claimed he would refuse to let his workers unionise (in fact, iirc, he couldn’t even legally do so in Canada), he just (repeatedly) stated, that he’d see it as a failure on his and his company’s side, if his employees felt the need to unionise in the first place. That’s a big difference.

          Can’t say anything to that part as I do not remember it. But I personally believe it to be a non-issue until there’s precedent. Politically, Linus generally seems to be fairly sane. He’s openly a huge fan of Lina Khan, for example and has openly critcised the current US-administration a number of times.

  • starman2112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    16 hours ago

    The one who takes

    Small companies’ prototype GPU coolers and auctions them off without permission

    • fatalicus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Posted this to someone else here, so I’ll just copy that post:

      You are of course talking about the Billet Labs prototype they has been told they could keep, but Billet Labs changed their mind after the video (valid, since LTT did fuck that video up), but a mistake was made by someone in logistics at LTT so it wasn’t put aside for return as it should.

      And when it got known by LTT that it had happened, they first offered to get the prototype back from the person who bought it, which Billet Labs said no to, then offered to pay them back the cost of the prototype.

      Is that what you mean by “steals”

      • starman2112@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        but a mistake was made by someone in logistics at LTT so it wasn’t put aside for return as it should.

        And was subsequently sold, without Billet Labs’ permission. What did I say that was incorrect?