FBI Director Kash Patel said Tyler Robinson, the suspected killer of Charlie Kirk, wrote a note stating his intention to “take out” the influential conservative activist.

Patel, speaking to Fox & Friends on Monday, said the FBI had “forensic evidence” of the note, but that it had “since been destroyed.”

They have a note but it’s been destroyed. Yeah, nothing fishy about this BS at all and it goes without saying completely incompetent that they continue to leak half baked, incomplete investigative information.

  • myfunnyaccountname@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    A right winger killed a right winger, at a right wing event, on a right wing university campus, in a right wing city with a right wing mayor, in a right wing state with a right wing mayor and their response is to blame the left. This country is beyond fucked. But the pedos will do anything to push us to total facism and protect the other pedos.

  • selkiesidhe@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    15 hours ago

    Shooter was a MAGAt from a MAGAt family. Left a note saying what he was going to do. So the 'government"'s response? Oh we gonna crack down on the left’s violence and make it illegal to be a Democrat!

    Fucking morons…

    • zd9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      10 hours ago

      …can we all stop with the dumb insults like “magat”? It’s always so cringey. That honestly sounds like something a MAGA idiot/Russian agitator bot would say.

  • captainlezbian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I’m just kinda impressed that a political assassin has managed to follow the golden rule of having been arrested: shut the fuck up, repeat ad nauseum

    • zd9@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Do you really think he hasn’t been talking this whole time? If he said anything supporting the Left, they’d have blabbed it all over the world. They’re just saying he’s not saying anything because what he’s really saying is far-far right stuff.

    • Jerkface (any/all)@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      15 hours ago

      That’s the rule when you’re a petty criminal, or a lawful person being investigated. When you are committing civil disobedience or terrorism, you fucking claim it.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Damn liberals. So cunning that they recruited a right wing nut job to shoot a right wing nut job.

  • acargitz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    73
    ·
    1 day ago

    They read the note from golden plates inside a hat and then an angel took them to heaven.

  • db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    108
    ·
    1 day ago

    “It was kept in the home of the suspect and his alleged transgender partner,”

    Why keep mentioning the transgender thing from just an allegation about someone who had nothing to do with this? These fuckers know exactly what the fuck they’re doing.

    • Krono@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      16 hours ago

      The governor finds a way to put “transgender” in every sentence, and at the same time he deliberately uses the wrong pronouns for this person.

      They’re doing it on purpose, and it is disgusting.

  • pleaseletmein@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    82
    ·
    1 day ago

    We found a note where he said he did this in honor of his black transgender immigrant girlfriend named Marxina McWoke. But the dog ate it.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    18 hours ago

    My guess would be that it was a note on some form of digital media. Say you make a document on your computer that you later delete. The data doesn’t actually get deleted, your computer just removes the location from it’s giant table of contents and marks the space “available to write”. Typically that information can still be retrieved using software tools until it is actually overwritten, and even then there are exceptions. So yes, it is entirely plausible for them to have forensic evidence of a note that someone attempted to destroy.

    • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      15 hours ago

      Except that isn’t what he said. He didn’t say that someone attempted to destroy it. He said it was destroyed.

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        13 hours ago

        Maybe I should have left that out, that’s just me analyzing it too much. But lets say you shred a document. You would probably say that you’ve destroyed that document. If someone then took the pieces from the trash and painstakingly put them back together into a readable document, did you still destroy it? Or did you attempt to destroy it?