Microsoft’s AI CEO, Mustafa Suleyman, has shared his opinion after recent pushback from users online that are becoming frustrated with Copilot and AI on Windows. In a post on X, Suleyman says he’s mind blown by the fact that people are unimpressed with the ability to talk fluently with an AI computer.
His post comes after Windows president Pavan Davuluri was recently met with major backlash from users online for posting about Windows evolving into an agentic OS. His post was so negatively received that he was forced to turn off replies, though Davuluri did later respond to reassure customers that the company was aware of the feedback.
Yeah, I don’t want to destroy the only environment where I can live to fuel AIs that only make rich people Richter. How silly of me.
Its mindblowing to me that this asshole can’t smell the bullshit he is spewing.
How to be a tech shithead:
- Be disproportionately rich
- Surround yourself with yes-men
- Disregard any valid criticism as “haters”
- Become completely out-of-touch
- Get your mind blown by most basic, obvious things.
Somehow, this guy is the CEO.
Yes, because your bank account depends on your incredulity.
Fuck all the way off.
Github copilot can do some impressive things, but it also ignores my instructions to not try to run anything and leave testing to me that I’ve stopped bothering saying it and just block the attempt when it asks permission. Just yesterday, it confidently said it had figured out an issue I was debugging with it and made a bunch of code changes that literally only affected comments. If I leave it in agent mode (which allows it to edit code) when asking a question to clarify something and not intending any code changes but wanting to think about the answer (and telling it that), sometimes it still runs ahead and tries to make changes anyways.
When it does well, it’s uncanny how effective it can be these days, but it’s not reliable enough to be trusted to be in control of the whole system. Plus I don’t trust Microsoft enough to put my data on onedrive, and believe that access to data is the real reason behind their AI push, no matter how much usefulness and reliability improves.
they even have an AI CEO
clowns
Truly disconnected.
Do you guys not have phones - energy
I’m impressed by AI, but I don’t want AI, now go away, you’re just as annoying as that blabbermouth droid and that creepy paperclip.
It just isn’t impressive and not worth the trade of damage to the planet. Writing some emails or something fine. But vibe coding and it being sold as this living learning machine is just sci-fi isn’t true with current AI. Find some green way to power it or remove it from society at this point before it gets worse.
The sad thing is, if it weren’t for the privacy horrors of today’s world, a voice activated agentic OS could be a fantastic accessibility aid for visually and cognitively impaired people, for example
Some things are only cool in movies. AI is one of them
as amazing as snake was as a toy on phones, it still doesn’t make sense to put a copy of snake in outlook. Or notepad, or paint, or office, or as an always available widget in the task bar
^ This.
It’s a neat, under-construction tool.
A. Tool. An ‘agent’ to do niche things is neat.
…But I don’t need a chatbot on my fucking toaster.
Even as a tool it lacks predictability / reproducability. If I give instructions to download a paint program, start a new canvas of 1920x1080 and use the gradient tool to go from red to green, you’re going to get the same result every time. If I instead told a class of students to ask an AI to generate a red to green gradient on a 1920x1080 canvas, the results would not be consistent.
I use AI, but it is a tool with flaws.
I don’t get the analogy… of course a bunch of students using different tools with different inputs will yield different results? But if they use the same model and input at zero temperature, they will, in fact, get the same results, just like any code.
Predictability has never been a strength of ML, of course.
…That’s not really what it’s for. It’s for finding exotic stars in a mass of astronomical data on a budget, or interpoliating pixels in an image, or for identifying cat videos reasonably well. That’s still a useful tool. And the modern extension of getting a glorified autocomplete engine to press some buttons automatically is no different if structured and constrained appropriately.
The obvious problem, among many I see, is that these Tech Bros are selling underbaked… no, not even half cooked agenic systems as sapient magic lamps. Not niche tools for very specific bits of automation. Just look at the language Suleyman is using:
I grew up playing Snake on a Nokia phone! The fact that people are unimpressed that we can have a fluent conversation with a super smart AI that can generate any image/video is mindblowing to me.
Even as a tool it lacks predictability / reproducability
If you use the same seed on the same model with the same weights you get the same results.
That’s not the predictability we want. If I write a calculator that adds the output of rand() to any result, it will also be repeatable with the same seed on the same machine. It will be non-functional as a calculator though.
Depends on your use case. Adding 0.000001*rand() to a large number retains the functionality as a calculator.
Your argument that AI isn’t useful may be valid, but claiming that AI is not repeatable is false.
AI is in fact not meaningfully repeatable in actual usage patterns.
God these dumbfucks will find any excuse to force you to treat your OS like anything other than an OS. Linux doesn’t need to do anything at this point except not suck.
Reminder that Linux has never been better than it is right now for gaming!
And with the help of Valve, it’ll continue to get better. Hoping companies like EPIC also take note and really start adding things to Unreal to really push Vulcan and Linux. Like, I don’t want a monopoly or anything, but if big companies make big moves towards supporting Linux, others will follow. ( I know Unreal supports Linux, I’m talking like actively pushing tech, support, pushing for games to be compiled for linux, pushing for native code and not needing compatibility layers, etc.)
Epic has come out and said it won’t happen. He’s butthurt and childish about it.
GeForce could gaming is a work around. Sometimes laggy. But what game isn’t?
I’m sooo locking forward to ditch Windows on my gaming station - tomorrow is the day! yay! (on linux for decades, but current gaming station is from 2017 when gaming on linux wasn’t that much enjoyable…)
Let us know how it goes!
