• DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Yup.

    This is it.

    Dems cave and they’re going to lose a critical chunk of their base… Probably forever. It’ll be a deathblow.

    And it’ll be massively fucking stupid considering they just dominated this election cycle, which is a message to them that they do still have a lot of support and that Americans don’t see the shutdown as their fault.

    HOLD. THE. FUCKING. LINE.

  • Wilco@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Primary anyone that caves.

    Its time to ratchet back to liberal. Fuck the center.

  • Manjushri@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    132
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Ahead of Democrats’ meeting, Republicans floated a new offer that would reportedly entail “rehiring federal workers who have been laid off during the shutdown as part of a deal to end it,” according to Politico.

    Okay… so their offer is, stop standing up to us and let us finish gutting healthcare, and we’ll rehire the people that we fired to punish you for standing up to us? Am I getting that right?

  • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    23 hours ago

    As the Senate Democratic caucus met privately on Thursday to discuss the party’s approach to the ongoing government shutdown following key electoral victories earlier this week, progressives sent a message to any centrists thinking of breaking ranks: “You cave, you lose.”

    Those were the words of Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who has vocally warned Democrats against abandoning their push for an extension of Affordable Care Act subsidies as a necessary condition for any deal with the GOP to end the shutdown—now the longest in US history.

    Always cutting progressive names outta headlines…

  • tal@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    22 hours ago

    I mean, I don’t especially think that the GOP is going to fully change course on health care. And I doubt that the Democrats are going to block the budget until Trump leaves office (though that’d be one for the history books).

    In my book, what matters for the Democrats is flipping the House in 2026. Whatever happens on the shutdown — forcing the Republicans to use the nuclear option so that they don’t need a supermajority in the Senate, the Republicans back down by conceding on health care, or the Democrats back down by conceding on health care, whatever, and how each side manages to set public perceptions around this — is aimed at shaping the midterms, which will matter.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 hours ago

        If the government stays shutdown they won’t have half the amount of muscle they expected, it could be more difficult for them to fuck with things without those funds. I do hope dems force republicans to end the shutdown.

    • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      23 hours ago

      Right now, the only way the Democrats have a chance at the midterms (assuming they aren’t overrun by some manufactured emergency to keep Trump and whoever he likes that day in office for life), is if they do keep the shutdown going until there’s a Democrat president in office.

      The problem with that of course is that it means the “small-government” Republicans and the Libertarians get exactly what they want.

      • IamSparticles@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        That’s contradictory. The midterms happen next fall. The next presidential election isn’t for 3 years.

      • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Due to the current administration’s shenanigans, states are needing to step up anyway. States came together to get the COVID vaccine out to their people, and to help one another track illnesses. I can see more cooperation like that in the future if the BS keeps up (which it most likely will). My state is already trying to figure out alternatives so we don’t have to be so dependent on the federal government.

  • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    82
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Oh good. Bernie is considered a “progressive” now? A millionaire with multiple houses, who’s taken in no homeless people with his megawealth, has only ever donated proceeds from books he had ghostwritten when put under duress is a leading progressive?

    We need to start electing real people.

    • village604@adultswim.fan
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Most of his money is from book sales and he owns 2 houses. A $2-3m networth is far from mega wealth.

        • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          This is an incredibly naive/underinformed take dude. $1 million is like the absolute bare minimum a single person at retirement age needs to continue putting a roof over their head and food on their table.

          I can kinda understand getting upset at someone owning two homes, but considering a million dollars “megawealth” is just out of touch with reality.

        • thingAmaBob@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 hours ago

          The reality is, anyone can gain that kind of wealth by their 40s/50s if they are financially literate at a young age. You can make a median income and still come out a millionaire if you invest even a small amount consistently from late teens/early 20s. Bernie is an old man, so anyone his age that did that could easily be a multimillionaire without trying too hard, even with a middle class income. Now, I’m not sure how he obtained his wealth, just saying that millionaires aren’t all evil or born rich, in fact most didn’t come from wealth.

          The main issue with many Americans not getting that far is poor financial literacy. Most don’t figure it out until their 30s, so they end up behind. Obviously, I won’t include those who were born in poverty as that is a whole other issue and is very difficult to overcome.

      • Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        4 hours ago

        Someone with a net worth at or below US average (~$200,000.00), who actually remembers trying to make ends meet on minimum wage, who owns no more than one home (preferably someone who rents). Oh, and preferably someone whose earnings mostly come from either a full-time W2 job or gig income (Uber, Lyft, etc.), not book sales or capital investment.

        • Blumpkinhead@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          3 hours ago

          You do you, but personally I’m more focused on a politician’s actions and policies, rather than their financial situation and background.

          Bernie has been consistently on the right side of most issues for his whole political career from where I’m standing. To me, the fact that he’s 84 years old and only worth a couple of million actually sets him apart from many of his rich, corporate owned colleagues.

      • WindyRebel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        7 hours ago

        I’m sure they are so progressive that they’ve housed a ton of unhoused people and freely give up their own food as well. It’s the only measure of progressive!

        /s because of today’s political climate

        • Hacksaw@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Oh no, you see they’re “not rich enough to make a difference”, so they’re allowed to do nothing. Since the definition is intrinsic to them they’ll never be “rich enough” to help and they’ll always “help when I’m rich enough to make a difference”. So they can always be good people while doing nothing and they can always chastise the rich for “not doing enough” no matter how much they’re helping because “if they were that rich they’d help more”

          It’s really beautiful actually how perfect the system is.