• DandomRude@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    110
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 days ago

    ChatGPT is allowed, but chocolate eggs with toys inside are supposed to be too dangerous? 🤔

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      I am literally just making this up on the spot and have no evidence for it, but I’m starting to wonder if maybe the real reason for the kinder egg ban was anticompetitive lobbying by Hershey or something like that, and the toy thing was just the excuse.

      • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        38
        ·
        4 days ago

        The american law prohibiting objects in food predates the kinder eggs by decades. And it’s because people use to put all kinds of shit in american food. The law that bans them into is the Food, Drug and Cosmetic act of 1938.

          • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 days ago

            Yeah, people like to mock us about it, but I think it’s a reasonable regulation.

            It should apparently be amended, though. There is a known case that it accidentally forbids but should not forbid.

          • HikingVet@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            4 days ago

            No godamn idea. I don’t have to worry about that law and I don’t know what exemption they used. I know it exists, why, and that kinder eggs are prohibited due to this law.

      • Delphia@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        4 days ago

        It wasnt the “toy thing” theres a law about putting inedible choking hazards in food. The food drug and cosmetic act of 1938. It bans putting any toy or inedible object in candy unless it is a functional part of the food. So the capsule in the kinder egg isnt ok but the wooden stick in a popsicle, the stick of a lollypop or the ring of a ring pop is.

        • Tuukka R@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 days ago

          So, they could put a lollipop-shaped stick into a kinder-egg, to function as a handle? Then the toy could be inside the ball in the end of the handle, so that it wouldn’t actually be inside the food, but a part of the handle, which would be a functional part of the food?

    • Øπ3ŕ@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      In all fairness, the guy was a fuckin’ idiot before Jippity tested a latent murder-sim theory it’s been puzzling over.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 days ago

      GPT needs another LLM trained on only the stupid things people do and how to avoid doing horrible things to yourself and others to watch over each conversation and intervene.

      US versions of Kinder eggs are just a stupid shower thought that was taken too far