• xe3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Google is in the process of undermining the effectiveness of uBlock Origin and other adblockers on Chrome and other Chromium browsers. I believe that change comes into effect this year.

        But even before those changes were announced, uBlock Origin’s creator and main dev has stated that uBO is most capable on Firefox.

    • Wes_Dev@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      “I’m so used to getting fucked by Chrome and Edge that I just feel like something’s missing if I don’t.”

  • Veedem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I’m all for people using Firefox instead of Chrome, but RAM being used up shouldn’t be a complaint unless something else needs that RAM. If it’s there, it should be considered usable.

    • xavier666@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wait, didn’t you all get the free furry butt-plug when you downloaded FF?

            • Dojan@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Google still has control over Chromium. Manifest v3 is a Chromium thing, not a Chrome thing. All forks of Chromium will get it and none of the browsers using Chromium as a base has moved to fork and maintain their own version of Chromium.

              This means that Google effectively has a monopoly over all browsers that aren’t WebKit or Gecko based, which is a tiny portion of all browsers. Leading to Google deciding how people access the internet. It’s already worrying that Google is the internet for a lot of people, the fact that they can do more or less anything with Chromium means that they can do whatever they want with the web standard.

              That should be a major concern for everyone. Chromium needs to be taken away from Google.

              • ulterno@lemmy.kde.social
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                0
                ·
                1 year ago

                all browsers that aren’t WebKit or Gecko

                I don’t get this part. Are all engines other than those 2, based on Chromium?

                Perhaps you are forgetting Ze great Konqueror ?

                Because it has always been KHTML.

                There’s a meme for that. Check it out

                • xe3@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I think Konquerer is no longer actively maintained.

                  Fun fact (which you may already know) the two most popular browser engines today are based on KHTML)

            • unalivejoy@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              But Chrome, the actual application you download (as well as several forks), is closed source.

                • grue@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  But that’s not the real issue. The issue is that any Chromium-based browser – open source or not – helps Google maintain hegemony over web standards. Even if makers of other Chromium-based browsers try to maintain a fork of the rendering engine, they’ll be perpetually playing catch-up removing user-hostile misfeatures because Google controls the upstream branch.

  • Iron Lynx@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I was at a party a few weeks ago and when we needed to use a web browser, one of the first things that happened was one of the attendees taking the computer to install FireFox.

    • cm0002@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      And not very efficiently either, can’t seem to handle 99+ tabs and starts getting unstable as you get closer to that number.

      Chrome at least can handle 300-600 tabs across 30 windows (The most I’ve ever pushed it) without breaking a sweat

        • cm0002@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          Hell the fuck no, I only ever run a single tab in edge, the tab to download another browser

          FUCK edge

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            ·
            1 year ago

            That’s one more tab than you need, tho.

            (Hint: use an OS that comes with Firefox – and a package manager, for that matter – by default.)

  • AeonFelis@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Firefox users may very well be doing that and no one will know because Google is not spying on them through their browser.

  • Nanomerce @lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ngl, I’ve never had issues with either for ram. my experience with Firefox is mostly the sameas chrome with ram usage. The main reason Im on Firefox is cause it’s been a whole lot more stable for me than chrome.