The Environmental Protection Agency is moving forward with approvals for pesticides containing “forever chemicals” as an active ingredient, dismissing concerns about health and environmental impacts raised by some scientists and activists.

This month, the agency approved two new pesticides that meet the internationally recognized definition for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, also known as PFAS or fluorinated substances, and has announced plans for four additional approvals. The authorized pesticides, cyclobutrifluram and isocycloseram, which was approved Thursday, will be used on vegetables such as romaine lettuce, broccoli and potatoes.

Archive: https://archive.ph/AapVs

  • Michael@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    32
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Why are people mostly silent about this shit?

    Please, please, please start spreading this awareness with everybody you know!

    From the article:

    The agency also announced plans to relax a rule requiring companies to report all products containing PFAS and has proposed weakening drinking water standards for the chemicals.

    So they are deliberately trying to cover up the pollution crisis in the US.

    https://www.ewg.org/interactive-maps/pfas_contamination/map/

    We test for, regulate, and monitor about 100 chemicals in our water. There are many, many thousands of chemicals that could be present in our water and harming our health.

    Related:

    https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2025/nov/18/california-pfas-forever-chemicals

    https://www.ewg.org/news-insights/news/2025/01/forever-chemicals-sludge-may-taint-nearly-70-million-farmland-acres

    • Formfiller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      Because everyday all day we’re bombarded by evil atrocities our government is committing on us and others and they dgaf what we think. We’re tired. It’s looking more and more like the entire world needs to overthrow the wealthy in solidarity

  • SabinStargem@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Now, I am not a very eco-friendly kind of person…but I don’t trust the Trump Regime to not fuck up. Their approvals here will almost certainly kill people, and probably wouldn’t even benefit capitalists in the long run.

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Every country in the world should ban food from the US.

    I’m sorry if you’re American, you’re fucked, but it’s what you guys voted for. The rest of the world should try and save itself

    • IsoKiero@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      The “fun” part is that ‘forever chemicals’ really are what they’re claiming to be on the label. Practically every living thing on the planet has some PFAS stuff in their body. Veritasium made a video about that a while back.

    • w3dd1e@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 day ago

      As an American I agree, I don’t trust our government to do the right thing and big corporations run all our farms. I don’t trust them to do the right thing either.

      Unfortunately, that shit gets into the water and makes its way everywhere.

  • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    ·
    2 days ago

    …they’re giving me cancer while simultaneously quadrupling my health insurance payments. My government has decided to kill me.

          • Fedizen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 day ago

            You can’t filter out PFAS from the food chain.

            Agricultural runoff gets into water supplies. In water supplies it gets used for irrigation, drinking water for animals, or goes out to sea.

            In each case forever chemicals will just build up.

            So even like that wagyu beef or wild caught fish eventually is just poisoning you.

            Plus PFAS are notorious for being difficult to filter and when they do break down they break down into smaller halomethanes/haloalkanes which are also typically toxic and even harder to filter conventionally. The main way to eliminate halomethanes is to bubble water to evaporate them into the air. A slow process which will make the contaminants airborne.

            Of course what does it matter if you get a new beach house courtesy of Bayer or Monsanto

            • AA5B@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              1 day ago

              Even if it’s 100% true, you’re being unnecessarily negative. It’s not a binary question, but “more” or “less”. There is definitely value in wayvpcho g the sources of your food

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                1 day ago

                Nobody said “don’t watch what you eat” so don’t bullshit yourself about what’s being said here.

                I’ve worked on PFAS filtration system designs that the US military funded for cities near airbases. Firefighting PFAS materials made their way into a lot of well water systems and municipal systems sometimes very far way. Its very difficult to reliably remove them from water.

                These materials are hard to control once they’re out in the wild.

                • AA5B@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  1 day ago

                  These materials are hard to control once they’re out in the wild.

                  Extremely, and that’s my bottom line to someone who claims some chemical in the hugeclass that makes up PFAShasn’t been proven harmful yet. Can we afford until it is unavoidably ubiquitous in the environment, can’t be cleaned up, and will last indefinitely? And it may already be

                  But I’ll also stand by: protected watershed makes a difference, filtered water makes a difference, organic food makes a difference. We’re already at the point of these chemicals being unavoidable in the environment, but we can take actions to reduce our personal exposure

          • Zron@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            12
            ·
            1 day ago

            Are there any water filters that are proven to filter PFAS?

            And what about irrigation water that is contaminated and sprayed on the organic crops?

            I get the rich people hate, but this does feel like an issue that will impact literally everyone. Once something is in the water cycle it’s hard to get rid of it.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 day ago

                Maybe but many eat at restaurants etc. I would actually expect rich people have relatively high baseline exposure outside affected communities.

            • Treczoks@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              1 day ago

              For filters with semipermeable membranes, like sea water filters, FPAS and similar molecules are way too big to pass.

              • Fedizen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 day ago

                Filtration of PFAS depends on the individual makeup of each chemical. The cross section of a organic fluoride containing compound is about the same as water so I would expect for chemicals without aromatic rings or branches a membrane would not be as effective and even then what’s happening is a time bomb where when these chemicals do eventually break down they break down into things that are harder to filter.

                We should be blanket restricting organohalides except iodine based ones.

                • Treczoks@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  13 hours ago

                  when these chemicals do eventually break down they break down into things that are harder to filter.

                  The very point with PFAS is that they don’t break down. At least not without serious energy input.

                  And membrane filters catch sodium chloride, which is way smaller than PFAS molecules.

            • ObtuseDoorFrame@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              Zero filters claim to filter PFAS. I don’t know if certified organic produce allows these chemicals to be used, but the organization that certifies food is also federal, so there’s no reason to trust it. I’m really hoping organic produce is safe from this. I would be able to get produce at Costco which is often both organic and affordable.

      • Fedizen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        1 day ago

        I have bad news about forever chemicals for whatever dumbass thinks this will only affect poor people.

        • zd9@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          Nah, the wealthy can use extremely expensive cutting edge filtering methods that remove all PFAS chemicals. I’ve done a whole research project on this. There are a handful of different methods, it’s just that it’s prohibitively expensive to scale up.

  • MasterBlaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    1 day ago

    Of course they did. Trump ended the EPA months ago. Think “invasion of the body snatchers” but for government.

  • Arancello@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    As if we need another reason to boycott mercan food. They are explicit about poisoning people now!

    • Treczoks@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      1 day ago

      That’s the reason why the EU only imports very selected kinds of food from the US. And even then, most of those are specially produced for export.

      • Among the thousands of beef farmers in the US, there is only a handful certified for export to Europe.
      • Kelloggs produces two kinds of Fruit Loops: One for the US market, and the other for export, which does not contain the chemicals that are illegal even in China of all places.