• EvilBit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          40
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          3 days ago

          It’s demeaning to an entire population. Pretty much the definition of a slur.

          • Larry@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            16
            arrow-down
            12
            ·
            3 days ago

            But “idiot” has the same origin and isn’t a slur?

            • Caveman@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              8
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              2 days ago

              It’s based on usage. R word is tainted now, this might change in the future or not. Language doesn’t care about etymology, only about usage. If the usage is generally negative and implies inferiority of a minority it’s a slur.

              Calling someone an idiot doesn’t imply that disabled people are inferior, which makes it ok to use.

                  • Larry@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    18 hours ago

                    No, they are used the same. Please provide a sentence where they can’t be used interchangeably if you claim they are used so drastically different.

            • AxExRx@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              32
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              3 days ago

              See also Moron, imbecile, and cretin.
              All Originally medical terms, that then entered comon usage as insults, fell out of favor medically because of that, were rejected by polite society, then after a refractory period and enough replacements, became lower grade insults that were more acceptable for common use.