

Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.


Turn off the motion sensor and only use the push activation, that wouldn’t break the “auto” recording portion. There’s always exemptions, security and law professionals wouldn’t be left without a way to assist themselves.


Umm… that could have just been the other driver asking the person for their footage from the camera they saw.
Not everything is a conspiracy dude, that’s commonly done after any incident lmfao.
I have cameras and plenty of people have asked me for random footage for thefts and collisions, none being a company or insurance, always the person affected…
Edit, sorry I guess once the police did, but still there’s nothing odd or weird about what happened to you.


No, I’m asking you. Because you seem to be applying the law to stuff it doesn’t apply to, so I’m trying to figure out your knowledge on it, so we can figure out where you went wrong.
And who said ALL the time, security cameras use motion, or a host of other tech to not record all the time and NOT store it. So which law do you think is being broken?
You are asininely saying that if I took a picture of someone throwing something on my house, that would be inadmissible because the street was in it…? Is that what you think the law is doing here…?


Front yards aren’t…
And you can’t record a public street for security? Even if it’s deleted? That makes absolutely no sense, how would you ever catch a crime?
Would be more of a broth or a tea no? There’s no substance which a soup usually has.


Front yards don’t have the expectation of privacy… that applies to backyards doesn’t it?
Just infuse the oil to make the dough.
The cables are compatible, but… that’s not how it works. Where did you get that information from?
A Thunderbolt 3 cable can transfer up to 40 Gbps, twice the maximum of USB-C. However, these speeds are only possible when using a Thunderbolt cable with a Thunderbolt port, not a USB-C port. This is because Thunderbolt 3 uses two lanes of PCIe 3.0 for data transfer, while USB-C uses one lane of PCIe 3.0 or two lanes of PCIe 2.0.
Enjoy your weekend walls are a more enjoyable conversation partner, maybe research stuff before spewing bullshit?
Of course I do, clearly you don’t… it is its own proprietary port, you need an adapter for usb-c. So you’re suggesting that they need to package adapters for it to work? Thats the whole point of usb-c, to get rid of them.
Also, as explained previously… not enough voltage, there is multiple limitations on that cable already as well….
You’ve shown to have zero knowledge here, why do you continue to insult and pester me because I’m trying to be civil and explain this to you?
Because it wasn’t out yet? But they knew it was coming, so they made a stopgap. They knew they would eventually need a form of USB-c, so thunderbolt is right out.
It’s a devkit, it’s for technology that is out for when it comes out, maybe a decade later. They know what’s coming out ahead though, stuff is announced YEARS to decades ahead.
Voltage limitations…
I’m sorry, you’re calling me obtuse because you don’t know usb standards? That’s funny.
There’s obviously a Reason, and as explained, bandwidth or power limitations. All previous revisions, weren’t right.
Since when is usb 3.2 good for 40gb/s, and what is the voltage and cable length restrictions?
Because the tech didn’t have the bandwidth capability, hence the doubling up…
As addressed already higher up the thread!
USB 3.2 that they specified from their ai synopsis can’t handle either…
not hating
“vendor lockin by nintendo?”
Your original comment absolutely did.
even know it’s a development kit,
So you just comment and decide to cry about Nintendo without even opening the post and seeing what it’s about…? That’s even worse lmfao. Just pure blind hate without knowing it’s a devkit… you’re the worst kind of person.
The rest of your comment isn’t even worth addressing since you’re just regurgitating ai, which is obvious since usb 3.2 isn’t capable of what you claimed….
None of those likely to be found on this specific devkit mate… those are all quite recent revisions.
And a cable length that short is useless for a console. Hence them needing something else… but sure just circlejerk hate Nintendo instead of having a discussion.
But it’s great you can google and paste stuff to support your “hate”. I figured you would put two and two together after googling and seeing how recent those revisions were. But you obviously can’t see past your hate here lol.
What revision is that, and that’s also seriously limited by cord length.
It’s anything BUT, it’s a dev kit lmfao.
And who allowed them unfettered access…?
Bandwidth limitations. Power limits the amount of data, so use one for each, or double the data maybe?
Sure, but people STILL knock on the doors. They likely didn’t participate in a conspiracy to get it, sorry.