• EvilBit@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        40
        arrow-down
        7
        ·
        3 days ago

        It’s demeaning to an entire population. Pretty much the definition of a slur.

        • Larry@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          12
          ·
          3 days ago

          But “idiot” has the same origin and isn’t a slur?

          • Caveman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It’s based on usage. R word is tainted now, this might change in the future or not. Language doesn’t care about etymology, only about usage. If the usage is generally negative and implies inferiority of a minority it’s a slur.

            Calling someone an idiot doesn’t imply that disabled people are inferior, which makes it ok to use.

                • Larry@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  18 hours ago

                  No, they are used the same. Please provide a sentence where they can’t be used interchangeably if you claim they are used so drastically different.

          • AxExRx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            32
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 days ago

            See also Moron, imbecile, and cretin.
            All Originally medical terms, that then entered comon usage as insults, fell out of favor medically because of that, were rejected by polite society, then after a refractory period and enough replacements, became lower grade insults that were more acceptable for common use.