• kowanatsi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    AI is the new bit of crap you now have to disable when visiting family. new apple device? disable in settings, disable in firefox, disable in duckduckgo. i see the benefit of ML in sciences but for gen consumers it’s just more personal data collection for sale so it can fuck right off

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    1 day ago

    Regular, non-expert internet users find it fun, or even amusing, to play gacha games. And yet the sentiment about a potential new gacha game panel built into Firefox has been overwhelmingly negative. While sophisticated gamer aesthetes find those creations gauche or even offensive, other cultures find them perfectly addictive.

    Most of the people that see gacha games as a valuable use of their time on this earth belong to demographics that are dismissed by all you internet weirdos. It’s an incredibly mainstream experience now. Regular people have no problem collecting trading cards, making the numbers go up, and spending money on in-game purchases. If Firefox wants to keep up with the times it needs a built-in gacha game so that it can protect the privacy of all the billions of people who will see it and understand that Firefox is the web browser and gacha game platform made for them.

      • DrDystopia@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        46 minutes ago

        I consider myself “above” a regular internet user, as in I’ve hosted Lemmy just for the experience and recently moved all my services to a closed mesh for security and because I can.

        Firefox have lost me as well, so who is it for these days?

  • Snarwin@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    21 hours ago

    If Henry Ford had given his users what they wanted, he would have built a faster horse.

    Users want AI right now because a lot of people have spent a lot of money to convince them they want it. A few years ago, they wanted crypto and VR; a few more years from now, they’ll want something else. We’re already seeing evidence that the current AI boom is an unsustainable bubble. Will “hundreds of millions of users” still be using ChatGPT after OpenAI’s investors get tired of losing billions of dollars every year, and decide it’s time to start squeezing their customers for more cash?

    This kind of trend-chasing is what happens when the people in charge have no real principles or vision underlying their actions. Firefox didn’t beat Internet Explorer by following the crowd; it won by delivering a product that was better, and doing things nobody else had done before (like tabs). In order to do that, the people making it had to have a strong vision of what a “better” browser would look like.

    • eleijeep@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      21 hours ago

      A few years ago, they wanted crypto and VR

      Funny you should mention that because the 2010 Webby Award Winner who wrote this article was also involved in developing a blockchain platform in 2014 which according to Wikipedia “has since been called the first implementation of non-fungible tokens (NFTs).”

      I wonder what he’s doing now…

  • BeanGoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    “I don’t want AI”

    “Actually you do though, but if you don’t then you’re an out of touch pretentious old weirdo and should just shut the fuck up”

    • hedgehog@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      1 day ago

      More like “Sure, but plenty of your non-techy friends and family do.” Otherwise the article wouldn’t have said that Mozilla needs to add a single toggle to disable all AI features to Firefox.

      • Snarwin@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        20 hours ago

        People don’t want Firefox translation because they “want AI,” though. They want it because being able to translate web pages is a useful feature. I think it’s quite telling that nowhere in the linked article does the author actually defend Firefox’s new “Window AI” feature as useful. Instead, the only argument he can make for it is that AI is popular.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        23 hours ago

        If it’s less accurate than previously used methods of translations? Yes.

        If it consumes more resources than previously used methods of translations? Yes.

          • Noxy@pawb.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Them it’s pretty far down my list of objections. It’s not automatically enabled and hasn’t been too slow or heavy in my experience.

  • murph@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    20 hours ago

    How about making it a nice plugin? Could it be something that is optional and not hard to disable? Or is that too much to ask?