Using third party translation services just like I want to use third party AI services instead of built-in AI is a price I’m willing to pay to come back to Firefox.
People don’t want Firefox translation because they “want AI,” though. They want it because being able to translate web pages is a useful feature. I think it’s quite telling that nowhere in the linked article does the author actually defend Firefox’s new “Window AI” feature as useful. Instead, the only argument he can make for it is that AI is popular.
Firefox translation is AI. Should they remove that?
Using third party translation services just like I want to use third party AI services instead of built-in AI is a price I’m willing to pay to come back to Firefox.
People don’t want Firefox translation because they “want AI,” though. They want it because being able to translate web pages is a useful feature. I think it’s quite telling that nowhere in the linked article does the author actually defend Firefox’s new “Window AI” feature as useful. Instead, the only argument he can make for it is that AI is popular.
If it’s less accurate than previously used methods of translations? Yes.
If it consumes more resources than previously used methods of translations? Yes.
There were no previous methods of translation.
I’ve been using copy and paste to translation websites both before and after Firefox implemented translation.
Them it’s pretty far down my list of objections. It’s not automatically enabled and hasn’t been too slow or heavy in my experience.