• Susaga@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    10 hours ago

    I’m honestly not THAT surprised. If there’s a high turnaround and little of value they can take from direct access, then you’d want it more accessible than secure. And since the value in an art museum is physical, the camera footage isn’t worth nearly as much. Plus, how tech-savvy are the owners of an art museum going to be?

    Still, you’d expect a number, at the very least. Or something like MonaLisa14. Something you change every 6 months. Louvre is WAY too default.

  • rem26_art@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Never put your company name in a password. Always use one of your competitors. They should have used ‘BritishMuseum’ or something

  • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    edit-2
    18 hours ago

    This doesn’t surprise me at all.

    At Circle K, the video system in the back uses “police” to access the footage so they can review and make a copy. Not sure if that’s the only access level, wouldn’t be surprised given how old many of those systems still are.

    • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      15 hours ago

      I bet there are other appropriate users, but this one was discovered by someone and it does everything they want to do, so is used for everything.

  • notsosure@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    13 hours ago

    Not a bad idea. Definitely easier to remember than the strings I tend to use: 35$?:5&?}^!,%*!bghkvgjnvfuBFGJBCFUNbfyjvct!,58’crrydgjm€?~%+’cWhxukbYjvJCFUB