• rarWars@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    12 hours ago

    People don’t label themselves according to rigid definitions.

    • signed, an inclusive bisexual who does not identify as pan
    • BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I probably fit the “inclusive bisexual” definition better but prefer the label pan. I also like the bi flag better so if I’m ever throwing a flag up it’s usually bi lol. I use pan because I’m agender and it feels kinda weird to say that gender is something I care about when it isn’t, but I find myself more attracted to people that present either androgynous or feminine, but not really masc (except for the ladies sometimes). All that to say, these labels are basically pointless and only serve to (poorly) provide a surface level summary of whatever the hell is going on in our heads