Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11か月前Stand your groundslrpnk.netimagemessage-square44fedilinkarrow-up1934arrow-down17
arrow-up1927arrow-down1imageStand your groundslrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11か月前message-square44fedilink
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up9·11か月前They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
minus-squareTypotyper@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up11·11か月前Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up1·11か月前Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
minus-squareFarid@startrek.websitelinkfedilinkarrow-up2·11か月前That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.
They attempted to write “Loiters* will be shot* on sight”.
Or “Looters” Or “Lawyers” Or “Losers” Or maybe it really is “L’Otters”. Those radical left rascals causing mayhem and dissection in the workers.
Wouldn’t it be loiterers?
LotRers.
Fans of Lord of the Rings.
Yes, but we don’t know if that’s what they wanted to write. But in that case, maybe they also wanted to write “shoot” and not “shot”, so yeah, fair point.
And wouldn’t it be shooted?
deleted by creator
That’s what they tried to write, but to be lexically correct it should be “loiterers”.