• Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Probably they’re more like Quakers, Episcopalians, Presbyterians, United Church of Christ, or United Methodists. You know, the denominations with openly gay clergy who see their role as advancing the cause of social justice and helping the poor and disenfranchised in their communities.

      Giving people shit for a label is bigoted as fuck. Also, thanks for making a dad joke thread about your unresolved religious trauma.

      • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        United Methodist is a tricky example to use. I know because I was one of their clergy at one point.

        Officially they still ban gay clergy, even after the recent schism where the most-bigoted group left and formed the “Global Methodist Church.”

        American United Methodists (especially the clergy) tend to be fairly progressive, but the African and Asian branches of the church are massive and extremely conservative. They’ve managed to keep the church from being able to change its official stance on homosexuality, which is that it’s “incompatible with Christian teaching.”

      • SquishyPandaDev@yiffit.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        United Methodists are no longer cool. They voted against gay marriage. And yes, to be fair, a good number of local congregations were pissed

        • Nahvi@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          That seems to be more of a kick-the-can vote to allow the more conservative churches time to leave.

          More than 6,000 United Methodist congregations — a fifth of the U.S. total — have now received permission to leave the denomination amid a schism over theology and the role of LGBTQ people in the nation’s second-largest Protestant denomination

          With these departures, progressives are expected to propose changing church law at the next General Conference in 2024 to allow for same-sex marriage and the ordination of LGBTQ people.

          https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2023-07-06/one-in-five-united-methodist-congregations-in-the-us-have-left-the-denomination-over-lgbtq-conflicts

          • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            That seems to be more of a kick-the-can vote to allow the more conservative churches time to leave.

            “We only voted against human rights so the people who are against those human rights can leave with all their money and property intact, we promise!”

            Man, you’re making these “progressive” churches sound wonderful!

            • Nahvi@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              Compromises are useful when you want something. When your side is about to win you don’t blow up the organization unless you have a mental problem.

              Also, from what I can tell the gay bishops voted for the compromise. If they thought it was the right way to handle it, I am not going to shame them for it.

              We will see if they make good on it next year.

              • SuddenlyBlowGreen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Compromises are useful when you want something. When your side is about to win you don’t blow up the organization unless you have a mental problem.

                Exactly. Like when the north was about to win the civil war, Lincoln allowed some slavery to be legal.

                Or when the allies were on the brink of victory, they went and allowed some concentraition camps to open again.

                Also, folding and voting against human rights to keep your hand on some property doesn’t sound like winning to me.

                Maybe you meant the Charlie Sheen kind of “winning”?

                Also, from what I can tell the gay bishops voted for the compromise. If they thought it was the right way to handle it, I am not going to shame them for it.

                I will! Fuck them, it was a shit decision, good job appeasing the regressives, well done guys.

                • Nahvi@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  3
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  The examples listed are examples of violent victories not political ones. Even then, they imply backtracking instead of maintaining the status quo until victory.

                  This was not a change in policy, it maintained the existing one, so that they could finalize their “divorce” amicably. There is a ton of properties as well as pensions involved. Properties that the UMC technically owns but was paid for by local congregations.

                  It might be worth noting that those gay bishops that I mentioned aren’t actually allowed under current church rules. If they forced the issue and the conservative churches brought them to court instead, there is no telling what the courts would decide. Making deals was likely the smart choice, even if it meant waiting a bit until they start offering gay marriages to their parishioners.

                  • LemmysMum@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Violent victories over political ideology. If you want to be an apologist for evil don’t be surprised when we think you’re evil.

          • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Not that I give a fuck whether the UMC survives, but you are correct. The bigots are leaving the denomination and many/most that left joined the Global Methodist Church.

            The only reason that the UMC wasn’t gay as fuck years ago is because the denomination is global and the African churches are bigoted against LGBTQ+. Their votes plus a fifth of USA congregations was enough to guarantee a schism. They’re just being strategic about the breakup because of how property is owned in the denomination.

        • Cylusthevirus@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, sadly. Though there’s been a lot of local defiance of that and in 2024 they’re expected to vote on it again.

          The local UM congregation in my city has a gay pastor and giant banners up detailing that they are open and affirming. There’s a whoooole splinter going on right now.

          Some of the conservative nutjobs are breaking off too, but a lot of that is in the US South (and Africa, interestingly; still a lot of homophobia on that continent).

          Also should be mentioned that there are two similarly named Presbyterian church denominations and one is cool and the other is VERY not.

          Still, all the more reason to not get hung up on labels.

      • Alto@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m not religious these days, but I’m really glad the church I raised in was a UCC church. My first experience with blatant church bigotry was when I went to a Baptist church service with a friend when I was around 10. Pastor used 3 slurs within 10 minutes, even as a 10 year old I was wondering what the fuck happened to love thy neighbor.

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You’re holding this person responsible for an evil because they share a demographic with the perpetrators, even though they have nothing to do with it? Yeah that sounds like bigotry to me.

      • Nougat@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        Giving people shit for a label is bigoted as fuck.

        Only if you have no choice about it. I have zero qualms criticizing people for their choices.

        • BaldProphet@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          From Merriam-Webster:

          Bigot
          : a person who is obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices
          especially : one who regards or treats the members of a group (such as a racial or ethnic group) with hatred and intolerance

          Synonyms include dogmatist, partisan, and sectarian.

          Here’s an article that may help you to understand why you are a bigot a bit better: https://www.existbetter.co/single-post/2019/04/15/Bigotry-is-a-SymptomHow-to-Handle-a-Bigot

          Hopefully we can eliminate hate of all kinds from this world.

          • Nougat@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Racial or ethnic groups are made up of people who did not have a choice about their race or ethnicity. While indoctrination from childhood can certainly cause a person’s religious views, and work alongside community pressure to keep them pinned in place, ultimately an individual is responsible for their own thoughts. Criticizing someone for what they think is not bigotry.

            Your article link goes to a domain that does not exist.

            • BaldProphet@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Maybe it’s blocked in your country. I had no trouble accessing the article.

              EDIT: Looks like the website got deleted after I linked it. Weird.

              • Nougat@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Looks like this domain isn’t
                connected to a website yet
                Is this your domain?
                Connect it to your Wix website in just a few easy steps:
                Go to Wix.com > Subscriptions > Domains
                Click Use a Domain You Already Own
                Follow the steps to connect your domain to your website

    • Sho@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      And in some circles tattoos are a no-no, a la leviticus 19:28

        • Sotuanduso@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          To keep it straight, remember when Jesus declared all foods clean. He didn’t say “all foods are clean,” he gave a policy basically stating that external things aren’t where sin lies, but internal, which meant that foods are clean. The same can be said of clothing policies, the health code, etc… Sin lives in the heart, and unless you think it’s wrong, marks on your skin generally aren’t going to taint your heart.