• In short: Aboriginal elder Jim Everett-puralia meenamatta was arrested in March for protesting against native logging in Tasmania. He says he won’t recognise the “colonial” courts.
  • He bailed to appear on June 3, but a warrant was issued for his arrest on Monday after he failed to appear in the Hobart Magistrates Court.
  • What’s next? Mr Everett says he expects to be arrested again, but he’ll have to be “pushed” into the court — where he intends to question its sovereignty over Aboriginal people.
  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    A Tasmanian Aboriginal elder says he has no intention of appearing in court — or participating in the “colonial” judicial system — on a charge of trespass for taking part in a protest against native forest logging.

    Mr Everett was arrested and charged on March 19 in a native forest coupe in the Styx Valley in southern Tasmania, and was bailed to appear on June 3; a hearing he did not attend.

    He does not intend to appeal against any sentence he receives — even if it results in a jail term — as he does not recognise any Australian court.

    The Styx Valley protest was part of the Bob Brown Foundation’s ongoing campaign against native logging across Tasmania.

    Veteran environmentalist and former federal Greens senator Bob Brown himself is among them, and will appear in court in July to contest his charge.

    Tasmanian Aboriginal Centre campaign manager Nala Mansell called on the charge against Mr Everett to be dropped.


    The original article contains 560 words, the summary contains 160 words. Saved 71%. I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • tau@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    32
    ·
    5 months ago

    The American inspired variety of sovereign citizen is enough, I don’t think we really need our own special version of the idea.

    • makingStuffForFun@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      You’d enjoy the yidingi nation in Cairns then.

      They have their own governer general, police, taxation department and more.

      They have an immigration department, and you can even apply to be a citizen.

      They are a nation, and are recognised as such by a fair chunk of overseas countries.

      They literally were dual policing, in public, with the Queensland police, side by side, on nadoc week, and have their own vehicles, officers and more.

      When you see that, and you see this guy from Tasmania, his claim doesn’t feel so far fetched anymore.

      If he’s from the nation that traditionally owns the land being logged, and he protests on his own land, then from a human perspective I feel for him. From a legal perspective though, situations like the yidingi of the north will probably need to be tested first.

    • maculata@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yeah, nah, this is different.

      I hate the US Sov Cit loonies, but this guy is righteous.

      Besides, fuck the logging companies that destroy native forests.

    • Zagorath@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      We already have our own nutso right-wing sovcitz. This isn’t much more extreme than Mabo was, prior to that case being decided.