I don’t think its fair to say just conservatives will abuse such a system anyone and everyone with an agenda to push will.

So what are they giving themselves the right to censor? Or just making it technically possible to do it?

Those are dangerous as those can be flashed with secure foss operating systems that allow turning off cell so they can’t be easily tracked.

Why bother when u can just put everyone’s faces in a facial recognition database and track them that way.

Let me guess another attempt to enforce encryption backdoor?

I can’t unfortunately. They only feature I use is that fact I can access my ipv6 only server via an ipv4 only network.

This isn’t the strength of gpt-o4 the model has been optimised for tool use as an agent. That’s why its so good at image gen relative to other models it uses tools to construct an image piece by piece similar to a human. Also probably poor system prompting. A LLM is not a universal thinking machine its a a universal process machine. An LLM understands the process and uses tools to accomplish the process hence its strengths in writing code (especially as an agent).

Its similar to how a monkey is infinitely better at remembering a sequence of numbers than a human ever could but is totally incapable of even comprehending writing down numbers.

I’m recon its a bit of both tbh.

Fuck yeah. Let’s go Australia make the free market free again.

Also u might wanna check out openwebui its a great frontend for llms. U can plug it into a bunch of services including remote api endpoints (I use open router for larger models), image gen, tools, searxng, etc. It also allows u to generate ur own api keys so its real easy to integrate any agents u use it to generate with other client services.

Ollama

I might be surprised with the performance u can get. Mind u a GPU would defiantly help.

Welp I have 64gb of ram and I only ever use that much running llms.

What are you doing?

Well Australian super makes up such a large investment fund that it can be used to bully the us into compliance

So an article about something is fine. But some hard data related to the article that proves the articles core tenant is false is “in bad taste”. Is this cos u don’t like the the reality of the facts and prefer the false reality? U would rather push a false narrative because it aligns with your belies? Misinformation is OK when I agree with it?

That’s what my comment was. I was just confused about why some other guy who just dropped the facts and data was being downvoted.

I think it absolutely will. The efforts of hank green and his team in regards to tuberculosis is a great example of how hammering the same point again and again can have significant effects.

Who’s down voting this? How can people dislike hard objective data?

I’m not trying to compare custody death rates between different groups I’m simply questioning the relevance of this article as a whole. I think its far more effective for us to be focusing on issue that effect most people before we worry about solving an issue that effects a fraction of a fraction of a percent.