Personally I think not having karma limits is nice currently! I understand why they were used but grinding karma as a lurker on reddit was frustrating.

  • invalidusernamelol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Zero tolerance for fascists, and zero tolerance for state propagandists.

    The fact that Lemmy is federated means you don’t need to be tolerant of anyone and if they want to keep spewing bigotry and lies. If you make it impossible for them to exist in an instance they’ll have to either give up or spool up their own instance that we can isolate.

    Because running an instance requires some organization, maintenance, and money, anything that becomes too isolated from the rest of the fediverse will eventually die out.

  • croobat@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t wait for the screenshot of a Reddit post of a Lemmy post of an Instagram post about Elon tweeting some shit.

  • deva@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mods locking threads because “y’all can’t behave” jfc just ban accounts breaking the rules and let the rest discuss

  • lobemanet@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Upvote/downvote counts mangling. Just show the real numbers, don’t mess with them with an unknown “algorithm”.

    • charles@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Since Nazis took over a Bluey Memes (children’s cartoon) Facebook page, I realized the only way to be rid of them is to have a zero tolerance for Nazis policy. Anything community purports “free speech” should be considered an immediate dog whistle for fascist creep.

  • Riley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Reddit has a longstanding reputation for being a hive of scum and villainy (like hosting the_donald for years, or kotakuinaction, etc). I really hope that Lemmy keeps with the general left-leaning vibes of the fediverse overall, hopefully being a good space for queer people, women, people of colour, etc.

    • Anomandaris@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think you do have to be careful here though. If you’re too permissive you allow bigotry, but if you’re too restrictive you cut off honest, good faith debate and create echo chamber silos where beliefs are never challenged.

      Bigotry should never be accepted but that means non-discriminatory opinions, especially ones you disagree with, should be allowed.

      • CynAq@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Good faith is the key here. I’m all for disagreements leading to lengthy discussions and even some controversy as long as everyone is arguing in good faith.

        I can’t stand trolling, outright bigotry, and the normalization of literal fascist opinions as a mere “disagreement”. If a “disagreement” (you know which ones I mean) will lead to people dying if enabled, I’m pretty happy keeping those ideas out.

        • lobemanet@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Gender critical ideas are based on truth and reality. If those ideas are censored here that would be terrible.

          • sparky@lemmy.pt@lemmy.pt
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            I’ve never understood the need to militantly oppose others’ personal situations when they have no impact on your own. Even playing devil’s advocate - what is the point of the hate? You don’t believe in gender identity, then don’t personally be trans. The fact that others may be would seem to have literally zero impact on you or your life. Why should Lemmy accommodate negativity that does real harm to people in sensitive circumstances?

          • Riley@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Hi! I’m trans. If you’re looking to change your mind about that I’m happy to chat! Otherwise I suggest you look to get out of here as soon as possible.

            • lobemanet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Hi! I’m gender critical. If you’re looking to change your mind about that I’m happy to chat! Otherwise I suggest you look to get out of here as soon as possible.

    • dowhat@lemmy.film
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      So you want censorship of opinions you disagree with? Sounds pretty fascist tbh.

  • Lemmington@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The forced ‘inside jokes’ that filled so many threads, so many times you would see a post and be able to predict the top comment and its replies. Hoping that the lack of account karma helps with that.

  • spin@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    The power that the admins have. While most subreddit bans were justified, in my opinion, it just felt really off for them to have so much power.

    • mcc@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Here admin has even more power, except it is limited to their own instance. So it is more on the user to be prepared. You don’t want to be too attached to your data on a single instance. The instance might be abandoned, down, gone; the admin might go crazy. And the solution isn’t to have the admin be more reasonable. The solution is to hedge your bets on multiple instances and multiple communities.

  • Sean Tilley@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Massive amounts of cross-posting / re-posting of the same memes over and over again for klout farming. It’s seriously awful on Reddit.

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    Getting banned in one subreddit you never participated in for daring to have a comment (regardless of the content of that comment) in another subreddit.

    • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      I see the same shit in the Fediverse though. Mastodon admins blocking a server just because they refused to participate in a shared block list.

      Someone’s going to make a script to ban a non-local user based on your remote posts, I guarantee it.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 year ago

        Isn’t the federated model specifically designed as a solution to undesired moderation? If a server is ban happy, users won’t go there. Problem solved?

        • oakley@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          1 year ago

          The fact that opening a new instance still requires some technical knowledge is a difficulty facing the fediverse, since the venn diagram of people with the time and know-how to manage server administration and people who are knowledgeable on community moderation aren’t always two concentric circles.

          • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            But that’s not a task that is asked of a general user, even if their goal is to switch servers. If you don’t like gmail, the solution for an individual is almost never to start your own email server.

  • Mane25@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    A relatively small thing: the 500-comment viewing limit for normal accounts. So many times on Reddit I’ve been put off engaging with posts with 500+ comments knowing that nobody would see it. It’s stupid because comments are just text and unless the software design is absolutely terrible then simple text comments shouldn’t take up bandwidth at all.

    • 2muchcaffeine4u@lemmy.fmhy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      the 500 comment limit made the concept of daily threads replacing common questions a killer on subs like r/fitness. “Has this question been asked before? Well, instead of being able to pull up several threads about this topic, I have to go through the daily threads of hundreds of days and search the comments for keywords - after increasing the number of comments visible from 200 to 500, and then still not being able to search all the comments on the 1000+ comment threads.” Just genuinely became unusable.

  • Cal@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a new community we need to identify and stamp out bad actors immediately and thoroughly (spammers, selfservers, ads disguised as posts, brigading, illegal content, racism, you get the idea).
    We can’t control if they create their own instances, but we can isolate them.

      • leanleft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this seems to be a good place to mention avoiding groupthink and trendy opinions. more fresh diverisity and bold independent thinkers.
        a flood of general americans would be worse than cultivating a niche counterculture initial userbase.