You can use this logic to explain away any other ponzi scheme too.
migrated to @ram@bookwormstory.social
You can use this logic to explain away any other ponzi scheme too.
ditto, sawk, vulpix, feebas, onyx, ekans, metapod
Also he lists hadoop twice
Edit: I see I also made the onyx/onix mistake that someone made in this thread.
I did edit it out, I didn’t realize they’d deadnamed her and while I’m fine with relaying drivel, I’m not fine with perpetuating deadnaming
It’s too funny, I can’t stop laughing at it.
It’s available on github too https://github.com/vector-im/element-x-android/releases/tag/v0.1.6
😂
Blockchain is a tool for scammers used for scamming, and has almost exclusively been used for such.
No, this is already solved without scam shit tied in.
No, he’s saying that the product is ineffective at what it aims to do.
It’s pretty bad when your CEO disparages your product that much. It’s like if Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella said they’d be switching to Google Workspace because Microsoft Teams was inefficient and difficult to use.
Absolutely scathing.
OnlyFans announced it too, but walked back on it later.
I’m not sure increasing punishment is actually an effective manner of combating this. The social implications of being a child predator are likely to have a more deterrent effect than the penal system imo (I don’t have data to back that).
I, personally, am an advocate for making treatment for pedophiles freely, easily, and safely accessible. I’d much rather help people be productive, non-violent members of society than lock them up, if given a choice.
Neither. I would have mental health supports that are accessible to them.
Ya, no, those people need psychological help. Not to feed the beast. This is nonsense.
Let’s not forget that these AI aren’t limited by age. Like fuck am I gonna be out here defending tech that would turn my kid into CSAM. Fucking disgusting.
You underestimate how important the feet are to many.
Oh great, Silicon Valley’s AI is just a major tech executive!
It’s actually worse than that. It’s a link to a service from Capital One that tries to help you find better deals online, a link to one of those lone-repayment services, and a link to a new car insurance company.
So I’m just thinking about how this would work, in a perfectly non-competitive world:
There’d need to be some Browser Standards Association to implement and suggest browsers to add to a list of “certified browsers”, with transparent requirements to be included to ensure low quality or outdated browsers aren’t included. The OS would need to implement that entire list in a randomized format. There’d preferably be some sort of built-in pros/cons list of the browser, I suppose these could be put together by a combination of the BSA and the competing browsers.
But these pros/cons won’t be understandable or significant to 95% of people.
The BSA would also want to ensure there’s diversity not just in browser and companies (like Opera getting 3 fucking entries), but would also want to ensure there’s a variety of browser engines (preferably not just chromium and webkit).