Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agoFAWK BAHD! PUT THAT DART OUT!slrpnk.netimagemessage-square10fedilinkarrow-up1418arrow-down12
arrow-up1416arrow-down1imageFAWK BAHD! PUT THAT DART OUT!slrpnk.netTrack_Shovel@slrpnk.net to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.worldEnglish · 9 hours agomessage-square10fedilink
minus-squareTar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up19·6 hours agoNot in anything Petrochemical. They rulebooks habe a very clear restriction on “anything that is, or appears to be” (a cigarette).
minus-squaresquaresinger@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up6·4 hours agoTotally makes sense too. If the fake cigarettes are ok, chances are that someone doesn’t get they are fake and uses a real one. Besides, using a fake cigarette has no benefit for anyone, so there’s no harm in banning these too if it makes policing the use of real ones easier.
Not in anything Petrochemical. They rulebooks habe a very clear restriction on “anything that is, or appears to be” (a cigarette).
Totally makes sense too. If the fake cigarettes are ok, chances are that someone doesn’t get they are fake and uses a real one.
Besides, using a fake cigarette has no benefit for anyone, so there’s no harm in banning these too if it makes policing the use of real ones easier.