• WoodScientist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    This isn’t about sports and it never was. Turns out when you’re willing to give in to one aspect of unscientific bigotry (the trans sports moral panic), you’ll be willing to give into others. And yes, opposing trans athletes in sports is fundamentally transphobic. Notice you never see transphobes like Newsom proposing narrowly targeted regulations that only address sports where some large and clear advantage has been proven. You never see transphobes like Newsom proposing that trans athletes in individual sports be given some handicap that would cancel out an advantage they’ve been scientifically proven to have. Instead it’s all bigoted blanket bans that are no different from bans that used to exclude black people from whites-only leagues. They never start from a position of fairness and compassion and try to intervene as little as necessary. It’s all about just keeping the filthy trannies out of polite society. These bans prohibit trans women from women’s gymnastics, for fuck’s sake. So yes, if you support blanket trans sports bans, you are a transphobic bigot. I’m sorry, but you can’t just hand waive it away with, “well aside from this example of unambiguous bigotry, I don’t see any bigotry here.” You might as well be saying, “well aside from this person being a registered member of the KKK, I don’t see any evidence that this person is racist.”

    https://www.erininthemorning.com/p/newsoms-bizarre-interview-with-maga

    • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      I wonder if you’ll continue to hold this stance after Trump starts putting trans people into concentration camps.

      It’ll be Democrats, or a continuation and escalation of what’s happening now. If we have a fair election at all.

      • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        22 hours ago

        There is an easy solution to this. DON’T NOMINATE NEWSOME. Transphobia isn’t an inherent stance for the liberal party. We can just nominate a candidate that doesn’t proactively shit on civil rights to, for some reason, court conservatives who are never going to vote for us.

    • iopq@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      13 hours ago

      It’s unscientific that AMAB individuals are stronger than AFAB individuals?

      • Pup Biru@aussie.zone
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        3 hours ago

        not for kids until they’ve hit puberty… there’s no significant muscle mass or endurance difference between males and females until after puberty hits

        so yes, in context of kids sports it’s absolutely unscientific

        there’s possibly a conversation to be had about teen sports BUT:

        • at the very least if a kid is on puberty blockers, there’s no reason to stop them from competing in whatever sport they like because puberty is what brings on the muscle mass that people are complaining about
        • until someone has an actual documented case of this being a problem, it’s an imagined problem… so far i think the stats were that there were something like 10 trans athletes competing in notable competitions across the entire US, and nobody involved has actually complained… in fact, there was a big blow up recently where a trans girl won some comp and a politician started using it to make a lot of noise about. the 2nd place girl came out in support of her and said how she was just better, and how it sickened her that the sport they both loved and the kids involved were being used in some political posturing. this is not a problem worthy of political attention