• Lost_My_Mind@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    192
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    I feel like I would have agreed with Google had they just argued “This is our private store. We did all the work to build it. We control the rules. If you want to make the Epic Store apk, you can. Sideloading is an absolute possibility. No hacking needed.”

    I would agree with that.

    Instead they argued by Epic charging money without giving google a slice, it compromises users safety and the innovation of the platform.

    Fuck

    Off.

    • iturnedintoanewt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      82
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      But apps outside of their store (such as fdroid) get constantly pinged for malware security scans, and android treats them as second class citizens in a lot of scenarios. It’s really frustrating to fight your phone on so many fronts just to use the apps you want.

      • Lka1988@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        24 hours ago

        I have many, many apps installed through not-Play Store methods. Haven’t really run into any issues with them. Yeah, Android gets a bit picky on initial install, but once you’ve gone through that process once, it becomes a no-brainer.

        • kadu@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          21 hours ago

          Haven’t really run into any issues with them

          This has been changed if you’re lucky enough to have a recent Android version, but not long ago any gallery app sideloaded from external sources couldn’t be set as the system gallery, meaning managing pictures was really annoying because any changes required a pop up confirmation.

        • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          For the curious, sideloading apps requires you to run a server on your computer, and refresh the signature on the app at least once a month. Because iOS automatically kills any apps with out-of-date signatures, only automatically refreshes signatures on official App Store apps, and doesn’t allow any signatures longer than 30 days.

          • aquovie@lemmy.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            1 day ago

            Don’t you also need a developer license? So that’s like an additional $8/month subscription to sideload on iOS.

            Or I could be wrong 🤷

            • kadu@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              21 hours ago

              Users make abhorrent weird workarounds for that, like running a PC software that uses a free temporary developer license to re-license an app on your phone, that then uses that license to resign other apps ““automatically””

            • Venetas@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              23 hours ago

              Not quite. You can use your free apple ID for temporary self-signing. But this cert is only valid for 7 days and can sign up to 3 apps simultaneously before you have to update the cert.

      • bitwolf@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        19 hours ago

        Does this still happen? I use fdroid and it’s not only more reliable than the play store, Ive never seen a malware warning or anything.

    • Aatube@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      However, the 2023 trial overseen by US District Judge James Donato revealed a pattern of scheming on Google’s part to prevent the distribution of alternative app stores on Android phones. While Android devices do allow sideloading of apps, and the platform is open source, Google’s scale and partnerships with OEMs made it a de facto monopoly. This led the court to impose extensive remedies that could remake the mobile app ecosystem.

      in the linked article on the 2023 trial:

      At the time, Google was quick to point out that the ability to sideload apps on Android meant Epic hadn’t been completely barred from distributing Fortnite on the platform (as it had been on iOS). “The open Android ecosystem lets developers distribute apps through multiple app stores,” Google said in 2020. “While Fortnite remains available on Android, we can no longer make it available on Play because it violates our policies. However, we welcome the opportunity to continue our discussions with Epic and bring Fortnite back to Google Play.”

      By April 2020, Epic had returned to the Google Play store, accusing Google of imposing a number of important limits on its sideloaded software. As the company said at the time:

      Google puts software downloadable outside of Google Play at a disadvantage, through technical and business measures such as scary, repetitive security pop-ups for downloaded and updated software, restrictive manufacturer and carrier agreements and dealings, Google public relations characterizing third-party software sources as malware, and new efforts such as Google Play Protect to outright block software obtained outside the Google Play store.