

orders have enactment dates so the orderees have time to implement it or appeal. the enactment date was yesterday night, so that is to be expected, and you were gonna see that message change this morning… except SCOTUS stayed it yesterday night
[He/Him, Nosist, Touch typist, Enthusiast, Superuser impostorist, keen-eyed humorist, endeavourOS shillist, kotlin useist, wonderful bastard, professinal pedant miser]
Stuped person says stuped things, people boom
I have trouble with using tone in my words but not interpreting tone from others’ words. Weird, isn’t it?
Formerly on kbin.social and dbzer0


orders have enactment dates so the orderees have time to implement it or appeal. the enactment date was yesterday night, so that is to be expected, and you were gonna see that message change this morning… except SCOTUS stayed it yesterday night


orders are not automatically revoked when appealed. the appeal court has to issue an emergency stay if it believes the appellant has a good chance of succeeding or hard-to-reverse harm would happen if the stay wasn’t issued.
the circuit court just rejected the stay application, so SNAP payouts are a go!
(poor people getting aid they’re already supposed to get is not very uplifting tho imo)


Geoffrey Skelly, an analyst for Decision Desk HQ, responded on X: “If Kentucky had just remained part of Virginia in 1789, voters there could be voting for #VAGov right now. Their loss.”
The Louisville Democratic Party responded on X: “We are here for this energy. Kentucky, put our primary May 19, 2026 and Election Day, November 3, 2026 in your calendar for our next elections!”
Journalist Caitlin Huey-Burns wrote on X: “This is a good public service announcement.”
George Conway, a former Republican lawyer, responded: “There is a distinct possibility that some people are too stupid to participate in a democracy.”
is this seriously not the onion


nobody’s saying that SNAP is worse than nothing


the inclusion of nothing phone in the lineup makes me unsure what op is looking for so i just assumed they was looking for general phone recommendations lol


the xiaomi 17 pro is getting a lot of hype for its display on the back, and this is the company well known for emulating an apple feel quite well on android… and being Chinese


nothing phone: are you aware that the nothing phone 3 got rid of the glyph interface?


i’m surprised that the fediverse manifestation here has not recommended the fairphone yet


I’m sorry, who the heck made the PRC stars white‽


Say that to Nature, one of the world’s most cited scientific journals by the Science Edition of the 2022 Journal Citation Reports (with an ascribed impact factor of 50.5)[1]


anything else would be a disservice, frankly


No. It’s just “6-7”. It is not supposed to be a rating or something with actual meaning at all. It’s just a pattern.


“slop” didn’t explode in popularity this year tho


I’d reckon that fine could buy far more in Argentina than what a dollar could buy in the USA.
i agree that the wanted image has so little information that it could be a different person. however i don’t see the discrepancies (they seem the same to me when my brain adjusts for perspective), so i do not think it plausible to say “he didn’t look what the wanted photos showed”


the act of persuasion involves a degree of acting
even if so, the resemblance is clear


In the memo, ahead of the campaign’s launch, executives grappled with whether to include public disclosures about “secondary” use – water used in generating the electricity to power its datacentres.
They warned that full transparency was “a one-way door” and advised keeping AWS’s projections confidential, even as they feared that their advice could invite accusations of a cover-up. “Amazon hides its water consumption” was one negative headline the authors anticipated.
Callaghan said efficiency savings have already been achieved and pointed out that other companies also don’t count secondary water use.
Scientists balked at the selective disclosure and the choice not to include secondary use of water in the total.
Going higher (up) in the graph means more tons of carbon emitted, i.e. worse things done to the climate.