• Doug Holland@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    3 days ago

    “If a publication ran an editors’ note to ‘clarify’ that some portion of Nazi death camp victims had preexisting conditions, it would rightfully be accused of Holocaust denialism,” said writer Natalie Shure. “This is one of the most depraved things The New York Times has ever published.”

    May I quibble? This is just one of the many, many depraved things The New York Times has published. And it’s pretty damned depraved, but I don’t think it’s in the top twenty.

  • febra@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    They’ve been manufacturing consent for this genocide since the beginning now. The liberal media belongs in the gutters of history. And remember, even Julius Streicher of Der Stürmer hanged for his crimes. Now we’ll wait and see how merciful history will be with these goons.

      • febra@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m sorry, that’s what I meant by liberal. I forget that not everyone shares the same understanding of this word as me. Conservatives fall into the same category too. What I mean by liberal is someone supporting liberalism in its true sense, such as supporting capitalism and private individuals owning huge media houses. Both of these groups inherently support the billionaires’ right to own the press.

  • PhilipTheBucket@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    every outlet that promoted this false narrative must update their coverage to reflect the full truth

    “Oh, you want the full truth?”

    “No no no, no no not that. Just enough context to encompass slightly more of this one individual child, and then stop.”