Is this that feminist riddle again?
Is this that feminist riddle again?
For me it’s usually a matter of overestimating how many chances I’ll have to read while I’m out. Or how tired I’ll be when I finally do get a moment of down time. Hard to read through closed eyes.
It sounds like you’re thinking of Tom Welling of Smallville. This is the Superman from Lois and Clark in the ‘90s. Costumed in episode one.
Edit: clearly doesn’t mean he’s not a loser, though. But I enjoyed the show.
LOAD “*”, 8, 1
If I were an overworked teacher, I’d still rather award the point. Just throw down a checkmark and move on. I don’t need to write an explanation, and the kid/parents are not going to complain.
Dried stevia leaves are subjected to purified water first. Then followed by a precipitation process with ferric chloride and calcium hydroxide to remove non-soluble plant materials & other impurities and follow filtration.
So they’re washed with soap and water? Must we use the scariest language possible here?
IDCLIP
I didn’t confuse Beast with Sonic, but I updated because it’s hilarious that someone else did.
No, no, he’s just a little elf prince. Never worked out a day in his life, no sir. Probably a vegetarian.
For you
deleted by creator
Theory of relativity. Which one is in the mirror is entirely dependent on your frame of reference.
Thinks she’s Sisko, but she’s Kai Winn.
This is technically responsive, but I think you have a fair criticism. A single rule like this would be much more maintainable:
#content .grid-container {
width: 90vw;
min-width: 12rem;
max-width: 75rem;
padding: 2rem 0 1rem;
}
Obviously, media rules have their place, but not for something that’s consistantly a full width container like this seems to be.
I’m a new developer. Is that referring to page 123 of the in-house documentation? Version 12.3 of the code? I have no clue.
You’d have to call it something like calculatePersonalIncomeTaxPerTaxCodeSection1_2_3, but I get exhausted just looking at that. There comes a point where the cognitive work of reading crazy long camel case names is more trouble than it’s worth.
An explanation of what specification a function was written to implement is a perfectly appropriate comment. Could be improved by a direct link where possible. But it’s worth noting what that comment isn’t doing - specifying any implementation details. For that, I really can just read the code.
Barely an inconvenience!
Gay men are men, trans women are women.
TIL every great work of literature is corrosive to humanity. Guess I’ll burn my bookshelf.
Worrying over internet comments is a sure sign of anxiety, possibly OCD, maybe even PTSD if there’s a particular trigger.