People wouldn’t be praising him if they really believed he didn’t do anything. I don’t know more than what’s on mainstream media
Some things are fishy but they are for many things, and I believe if he was innocent, we would have heard a lot more. Currently afaik they’re trying to prove that not everything was handled according to the law, but that’s coping
Oh okay so it’s not useless then
Damn, didn’t know that was a thing, I’ll check if that’s also the case for me
It should be negligible anyways
There isn’t https://help.steampowered.com/en/faqs/view/1902-2D54-E445-59DD
Maximum friend list size seems to be capped at 2000 though
Because it wasn’t his role, and he still is a murderer
If the situation was the same, but the killer didn’t know the person he killed did all that, would you believe the same? Does intent really change anything? Else, some crimes could go unpunished
And “indirectly” can be stretched far. Employer not paying enough, lawmakers enabling this, food makers putting dangerous additives in food
Should we also kill hotel managers that put expensive rooms, so homeless or poor people can’t buy them, have to sleep outside, and could die from it?
Same for flat and house owners. Putting an expensive rent, therefore lowering the money of the person living inside, and not allowing them to afford proper medical care would be considered indirectly killing, and the owner should be killed?
It has huge implications, and we all have a role in it
That’s a better explanation, but Steam still allows for much bigger friends list if you craft badges, so pay, but not for specifically paying games
certain individuals
certain individuals many individuals
It’s evil but it’s all legal. Can’t kill them, too authoritarian. They should be in jail instead
Oh yea fuck em by all means, I just think comparing what they did to murder is fine
If all greedy people were dead, there wouldn’t remain a lot of people on earth
I’m sure you knew someone at some point that could have done it
Would the world be better without them? Certainly. Is killing them okay? I find it excessive
Laws are certainly required to stop this behavior
Apart from Steam, which platform does that?
Many people don’t know that’s a thing in Steam btw
I’m pretty sure he is the only suspect, and evidence was found in that regard
He also doesn’t seem the act as if he was innocent
You created a medicine that can save sick people. Are you forced to sell it to sick people? If you ask for a lot of money, way more than it cost you to make it, is it killing them?
I would say it’s shitty, but you don’t owe people anything.
Now yea, not covering medical expenses for people in life threatening situations is really bad, but doing it when they’ll be okay and have to pay is less evil.
And yea, about the cliff, I believe not helping is not the same as killing someone. You didn’t put them in this situation, and acting could affect you negatively. (But they would suffer a lot more from you not acting)
America needs social healthcare by the government, not private companies
You also need to test genuine images to check the real accuracy
In some games, they’re public by default then you should make them private. I’m thinking of Dying Light for example
Why are friend list size limits a thing? Except for UI, it shouldn’t be a problem. And a simple search feature fixes the problem
Thanks
I believe not helping/providing service to people in need of help is a lot less worse than killing people directly
The guy was probably a massive dick but glorifying his death and the killer is wild
The comments are insane
Are they really accurate?
What’s up with the misinformation and low effort trolls regarding this topic?
I believe they are accountable, but shouldn’t be punished by death obviously