

Regardless of what we think about the ad, why is the scrutiny on the model and not the brand or the marketing company?
Regardless of what we think about the ad, why is the scrutiny on the model and not the brand or the marketing company?
Ah yes, the answer to any social problem: eugenics
And this is also why ‘black people have big dicks’ is a historical stereotype. Sure they have big dicks, like horses or cattle…
And it’s a weird thing where people now think it’s a ‘positive’ stereotype
I remember a Man U chant about a player having a big dick - anti-racism organisations called it out and the chanters were shocked. It’s a ‘positive’ thing, right?
History is kinda weird and very racist
As a knowledge fight fan, I feel like I should say that it’s more than a ‘fact check’ - it started out more like that, but it functions as a deconstruction of the methods, motives and aims of a right-wing idealogue and by extension, others in that sphere (tucker carlson, rogan etc)
It’s a good way to keep up with and have an understanding of what’s going on in that horrific but impactful space without having to wade in yourself
Was/were are verbs, not pronouns (yes I am fun at parties thanks)