

I see. Yea that makes sense, thanks.
I figured they were just okay giving out the free advertising to one of their own. But stolen also makes sense.
Honestly someone should just look up the photographer, email him and politely ask him if he was paid or not.
edit: Likely case: They asked him for it and he happily donated it, so long as they kept the watermark, and they were totally cool with that.






Yeah, this seems like a sort of position paper for a medical association. Here it’s less about serious harm and more about a general lack of benefits.