• Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    No, this is what will realistically happen:

    1. They’ll intercept the boat
    2. They’ll haul it to a nearby Israeli port (like the port of Ashdod)
    3. They’ll detain and question the people on board for a bit to confirm their identities
    4. They’ll call their respective embassies in Israel
    5. They’ll have them either released to the embassies or directly deported to their countries

    And that would be the end of it.

    • barneypiccolo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      And 6. The aid that was meant for the starving children of Gaza will be stolen, destroyed, or left to rot in some warehouse.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        7 hours ago

        The aid is just symbolic. Gaza has 2 million people, a single small sailboat worth of partial cargo isn’t enough to even be considered a drop in the bucket. The only real way humanitarian aid can make a difference is if Israel and Egypt allow hundreds of tucks in daily.

    • wpb@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I’m not sure what you’re basing your predictions on. Have you studied what they’ve done to similar vessels in the past? I know of only two, the raid in 2010, where they killed 9 people, and the the one earlier this year, where they shot at the ship with two drones. That’s fairly limited, but quite a far cry from your predictions.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 hours ago

        This is actually based on what they did in during the 2010 incident. At the same there 6 boats, not one like this time. 3 of the boats at the time were for cargo and 3 were for passengers. 5 of the boats that were intercepted went through what I described above, but the last one was the one you’re talking about. It was one of the passenger boats, it has 590 passengers on board. Of these passengers, 40 or so of them refused to cooperate with the Israeli soldiers on board and some started attacking them. This resulted in the Israeli soldiers killing 9, a 10th one died 4 years later due to related injuries, and injured a dozens more. At the same time the activists injured 10 Israeli soldiers, including one that was in serious condition. Even then, the rest of the passengers were still released after the incident.

        • wpb@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          So I don’t really see how you go from seeing Israel kill 10 passengers to your 6 point prediction. I’m not saying you’re wrong, but considering we’re dealing with the modern day equivalent of nazis who seem to enjoy support from most western governments, I find more grim scenarios equally likely.

          • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 hours ago

            I mean we have to go based on the evidence that we have, right? We can’t make up scenarios and pretend they’re reality when they’re not. In this case, Israel radioed the boat to change course to the port of Ashdod and informed the activists that maritime traffic is closed. After that the boat has been intercepted. That’s all we know thus far. Beyond this point, it’s just speculation. I’m saying that based on the history of these incidents, the intercepted boats do actually get routed to the port Ashdod, and then from there the activists are taken into custody until Israeli authorities contact their respective embassies who will help organize their release.

    • Machinist@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 hours ago

      Well, I guess it has utility because we’re talking about it. It’s expensive but I don’t really think there’s much else that can be done other than state level actors putting a stop to it. Or like a reverse crusade where freeing Palestine from Israel is the goal, need a leader for that.

      • Gorilladrums@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Well, I guess it has utility because we’re talking about it.

        I guess, but at the same time this has been the most talked about international conflict of this decade so they’re bringing attention to a thing that is already receiving a lot of attention.

        I don’t really think there’s much else that can be done other than state level actors putting a stop to it. Or like a reverse crusade where freeing Palestine from Israel is the goal, need a leader for that.

        Force is not going to end this catastrophe. First of all nobody wants to get directly involved, especially on the side of the Palestinians, but even if they did, Israel is quite strong. Arab coalitions in the past tried to do just this and they weren’t successful.

        The only way for this conflict to actually end is for Israel to end it, and the only way this can happen is if Netanyahu and his coalition get ousted from government. He should’ve been in prison decades ago, but it’s very likely he will be once this war ends which is likely why he doesn’t want to end it. Regardless, if this government doesn’t collapse soon, then we will have to wait until the next general Israeli elections on Oct 27th, 2026. Either Netanyahu’s coalition ends the war themselves to try to win back the public before the elections or the opposing coalition is going to end it right after they win.